Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House rejects gay marriage ban amendment
AP (Yahoo) ^ | 7/18/06 | JIM ABRAMS

Posted on 07/18/2006 11:44:27 AM PDT by madprof98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: pollywog
It's mindless and the STUPID people keep putting these godless imbeciles back in position, election after election after election. I'm to angry to say more ... or I'll get banned.
21 posted on 07/18/2006 12:01:06 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nmh

This was never intended to pass. It's sole purpose is to force House members to take a public position on the issue.


22 posted on 07/18/2006 12:02:04 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Melissa Bean (D-IL) voted against the ban even though She Represents the most Conservative district in Illinois. SHE IS TOAST!!!!


23 posted on 07/18/2006 12:03:48 PM PDT by Jack Ian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

LOL..Harold Ford, Jr. voted for it. He must be running for another office. Don Imus and Chris Matthews are deeply saddened.


24 posted on 07/18/2006 12:05:02 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
It won't be dealt with at the state level if the Supreme Court decides to force it on everyone just like they did with Roe.

Marriage is supposed to be dealt with on the state level. One can formulate circumstances for any situation, but that's where it should be dealt with and where it will be dealt with. By your rationale, we shouldn't even HAVE a SCOTUS because we can imagine them doing anything in the post-Roe era, though I've seen nothing about the Roberts court that scares me about that outcome.

25 posted on 07/18/2006 12:08:19 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (http://www.savethesoldiers.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
This was never intended to pass. It's sole purpose is to force House members to take a public position on the issue.

Nailed It.

Thank you for bringing some sanity with you today.

26 posted on 07/18/2006 12:10:31 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (http://www.savethesoldiers.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nmh

There must be a TON of gays in the House!!


27 posted on 07/18/2006 12:12:37 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Do you have the breakdown of the 29 Republicans.


28 posted on 07/18/2006 12:13:55 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nmh
"We need to SHAME those Republicans that voted against this."

Well, Schwartz of Michigan voted NO, and he is in a tough race with a strong conservative ( Tim Walberg) in the Aug 8th primary, in the very conservative 7th district !

We can get rid of that slug with no danger of losing a seat in Congress.

Everyone in Michigan's 7th district...Be sure to vote for Walberg Aug 8th!! Vote early and often.
29 posted on 07/18/2006 12:21:28 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Liberals get up every morning and eat a big box of STUPID for breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

The usual suspects, pantywastemarkkirk, littlerichboycharliebass, limpdickchrisshays, etc.


30 posted on 07/18/2006 12:21:42 PM PDT by Jimnorwellwarren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jimnorwellwarren

Gay Wanna-bes.


31 posted on 07/18/2006 12:23:02 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

I prefer to think of them as guys who feel themselves a little bit "above" their constituents. Bass and Kirk are two excellent examples of this variant. In the case of Gilchrest, his brother was a sodomite so therefore the nation must recognize homosexual marriage.


32 posted on 07/18/2006 12:26:02 PM PDT by Jimnorwellwarren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
" I shudder to think what might happen."

Umm, shot down like a slow bird?
33 posted on 07/18/2006 12:41:47 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Interesting that Ohio's Sherrod Brown (running against Mike DeWine for a senate seat) and Ted Strickland (running for governor in Ohio) were both MIA for the vote. Seems like a convenient way to avoid controversy.


34 posted on 07/18/2006 12:48:28 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
A Constitutional Convention is a bad idea...

Agreed.
35 posted on 07/18/2006 12:52:36 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: keats5
Let's create a government for the people and by the people.

That was tried somewhere once. Guess it didn't work.

36 posted on 07/18/2006 12:55:03 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jimnorwellwarren

Yuk.


37 posted on 07/18/2006 12:57:03 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Thank you Todd Tiahrt


38 posted on 07/18/2006 12:57:42 PM PDT by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith

yeah, a good time to step out and grab a sandwich for those 2.


39 posted on 07/18/2006 12:58:08 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Never Forget 9/11/01...R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RonF
I suspect it means he's in a tight election this year, and he doesn't want to make either side really mad at him-so he admitted only to being in the room (present).
40 posted on 07/18/2006 1:10:47 PM PDT by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson