Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House rejects gay marriage ban amendment
AP (Yahoo) ^ | 7/18/06 | JIM ABRAMS

Posted on 07/18/2006 11:44:27 AM PDT by madprof98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Prov3456

Pryce from Ohio is a sell out. I dont like her anymore.


41 posted on 07/18/2006 1:17:04 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Never Forget 9/11/01...R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

But you know the STUPID party (GOP) won't make this a campaign issue. They don't like to talk about those on "controversial lifestyles{ for fear of being vilified. Too often the GOP has NO BACKBONE and this "big tent" crap fuels it.


42 posted on 07/18/2006 1:29:34 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

But you know the STUPID party (GOP) won't make this a campaign issue. They don't like to talk about those "controversial lifestyles" for fear of being vilified.

Too often the GOP has NO BACKBONE and this "big tent" crap fuels it.


43 posted on 07/18/2006 1:30:21 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

No freakin' balls.


44 posted on 07/18/2006 1:31:55 PM PDT by P8riot ("You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone." - Al Capone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Any democrat or RINO that receives financial donations from the Victory Fund CAN'T vote for the Gay Marriage ban. That is conditional on receiving the endorsement.

Victory Fund Annual Report cofounded by David Mixner.

http://www.victoryfund.org/clientuploads/documents/Victory_2003_E-Resolution.pdf

The Gay & Lesbian Fund provides financial support to openly lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender candidates and officials.

Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund 2004 Annual Report

http://www.victoryfund.org/clientuploads/documents/Victory_2004_Annual_Report.pdf

The RINO's fund is under a different name than the Victory Fund; but comes from the same source. I'm cooking dinner and can post that URL if it is needed. I don't have it in my notepad past...but it is in my file folder.

45 posted on 07/18/2006 1:36:23 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I agree - a matter for the states to decide. I WOULD like to see an amendment making the issue off limits to SCOTUS though.


46 posted on 07/18/2006 1:38:49 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Thanks for posting.

David Dreier and Mary Bono go Rainbow.

The rest of our California (R) contingent voted Yea.

Of course, the California Dems all voted Nay.


47 posted on 07/18/2006 1:41:33 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

>>>The RINO's fund is under a different name than the Victory Fund; but comes from the same source. I'm cooking dinner and can post that URL if it is needed. I don't have it in my notepad past...but it is in my file folder.

http://www.logcabin.org

The Log Cabin Republicans belongs to the LGBT community. A federal political action committee working to build new alliances in the gay and lesbian community in the Republican Party.


48 posted on 07/18/2006 1:42:42 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Prov3456

He's my representative. His district is a pie-wedge shape that includes a chunk of the City of Chicago at the tip and some of the SW suburbs at the fat end. The Dems in the City outweigh the surburbanites, who split between Dem and Repub anyway.

His father represented the area for a great many terms. He rarely faced serious opposition during either primary or general elections. After he won his last primary (very comfortably), he resigned and arranged for the Democratic Central Committee to appoint his son as his successor in the general election. His son have to move from Tennesee into the district to qualify. Although much scandal was printed about this arrangement, he won comfortably. And I expect that he'll win comfortably again. He's probably trying to bridge the two constituencies between the City (who would follow the Democrat party line) and the suburbs (more conservative). He generally votes more conservative than almost any other Democrat in the House, which reflects his district.


49 posted on 07/18/2006 1:43:29 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Perhaps it is a bad idea. But the threat of it (say, 10 or 12 states voting for one right off the bat) would scare the Congress enough for it to vote this out to the states.


50 posted on 07/18/2006 1:44:56 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Mary Bono is endorsed by the Log Cabin Republicans, ie., LGBT community.

They have a contract that has to be signed to receive the endorsement which includes what issues they have to endorse to receive the donations. They also have to be gay to receive the money.


51 posted on 07/18/2006 1:45:57 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DManA
I WOULD like to see an amendment making the issue off limits to SCOTUS though.

Is such a thing legal?

Frankly, the nation is so overwhelmingly against gay marriage that I just don't see it as an insurmountable threat. I think the states will do it, and I just don't see SCOTUS making it the law of the land--on what legal grounds would they do so?

52 posted on 07/18/2006 1:48:02 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (http://www.savethesoldiers.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I don't know. Because it's legal in some foreign countries? Justices have used that rationale in the past so it's not that far fetched. These are the most highly trained legal minds in the country. They could come up with a legal argument for ANY CRAZY proposition you could think up. on what legal grounds would they do so?
53 posted on 07/18/2006 2:03:20 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Because it's legal in some foreign countries? Justices have used that rationale in the past so it's not that far fetched.

I would have to say that's a rarity. And on an issue much less on the minds of most people. But we will see.

54 posted on 07/18/2006 2:04:31 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (http://www.savethesoldiers.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

List, I presume.


55 posted on 07/18/2006 3:07:04 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: madprof98; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

The 236-187 vote for the proposal to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman was 47 short of the two-thirds majority needed to advance a constitutional amendment. It followed six weeks after the Senate also decisively defeated the amendment, a top priority of social conservatives.

Sooner or later the FMA will happen...

WHY? -- Because the homosexual agenda acrtivists will not stop UNTIL stopped -that is the nature of those intent on self destruction...

58 posted on 07/19/2006 10:34:15 AM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
List, I presume.

;-)

59 posted on 07/19/2006 10:36:10 AM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
The average vote against gay marriage equals 70% against, 30% for. Gallup just released a phony poll 58% against, 32% for. Sounds about right, the phony polls are off about 12%.
60 posted on 07/19/2006 10:43:40 AM PDT by John Lenin (If you are looking for a mind numb robot, I'm not it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson