Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Netizen

thanks for the reseach!


48 posted on 11/10/2006 10:56:15 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb
thanks for the reseach!

No problem, glad to do it. It seems that Applebutter was banned or suspended, though I don't know when.

I just wish that this thread would have gotten more traction when it was first posted in July. I also wish that I knew of a means to prevent the cascade I see coming. The third section has some viable options to work with. Here is one:

Moreover, those who challenge through extra-legal means the extra-constitutional and fait accompli pro-immigration methods of the elites would, paradoxically, be abiding more by the spirit and even letter of the U.S. Constitution than the political class being targeted by them. The Federalist Papers are replete with this philosophy. If they do so effectively, the reaction of the U.S. Congress may be the same as it was for the Pennsylvania legislature in the aftermath of the pay-raise scandal. Both policies are difficult to defend openly and publicly with an engaged citizenry.

Okay, so we have legal recourse. Anyone know if this particular section means we can take it to the Supreme Court? Would our complaints have to go through state court(s) first?

59 posted on 11/11/2006 7:21:32 AM PST by Netizen (When the PINO signs his beloved scamnesty bill, the GOP officially dies and the Bush legacy is set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson