Posted on 07/26/2006 1:06:42 PM PDT by kathsua
There are also 77 million people who are not in the labor force. Many of them may not have actively sought work during the survey period (i.e. stay-at-home parents, older people, students) but would take a good job if it were available.
Excellent point. Our county paid a nonprofit to run a day laborer center to keep the illegals from loitering at the 7-11. Did it work? Nope. The nonprofit wanted the employers to register and promise to actually pay the workers, and provide decent wages and safe conditions at that. The 7-11 is just a block from the nonprofit's center, but that's still where everyone goes for workers.
Let's get real -- if an employer wanted to pay decent wages and provide safe working conditions, he'd hire an American.
ping
Yes, a golden oldie often used by the quislings in tandem with the "illegal aliens are merely doing the jobs Americans won't do" evergreen.
Gee, seems we did pretty good before they came.if they leave then the strain on govt services and hospitals goes with them. they are here ileagaly get it?
Gee, seems we did pretty good before they came.if they leave then the strain on govt services and hospitals goes with them. they are here ileagaly get it?
Immigrants do enhance our american culture. ILLEGAL ALIENS, on the other hand, cost taxpayers large sums of money and most have no intention of being productive, legal members of our society.
The concept of "cheap" agricultural labor is a dead-end, anyway.
Rather than using capital investment in machinery and innovation, that farmer will rely on low-productivity manual labor as long as it is available.
The author's general point that we "need" all this manual labor is only true up to a point. Capital investment and innovation can permanently remove the need for those jobs. Replacing them with fewer jobs that require more skill, and pay better. Why should we encourage the perpetuation of jobs that require no skill and no education ? Are those workers ever again going to be people we want to attract to our society ?
Maybe in the last century America still had a place for that class of worker, but in today's America they can only become a permanent underclass that will fester with envy for a standard of living they can never have. Legalizing them will only feed their anger as they DEMAND a standard of living that unskilled labor cannot earn.
straw man alert....
This author is a traitor of the first order.
THE BIG LIE! 85% of these jobs are currently done by Americans.
"Those who are overly upset by the fact that millions of illegal immigrants are in the country need to consider two facts. Immigrants have traditionally played an important role in the U.S. economy and will be even more important in the future. Americans are not the most law abiding people. Americans have even been known to venerate lawbreakers."
The author is a #$@#$ing moron who's just repeating the Left's mantra.
Yes, this country was built by immigrants. LEGAL immigrants.
There is a widespread effort by the Left to make illegal=legal, and I'm getting tired of it. It's a crucial distinction, and one that they want to gloss over.
As for rationalizing that we're not law abiding, words fail me. So, just because Americans break laws, then whoohoo, all law is meaningless, and we can all do what we want?
The author is an utter dolt. I won't even go further, I've seen better writing in Middle School school student-written newspapers.
More recently, the California Tomato growers claimed the same thing. Back in the 50's there was the "braceros" program which was a guest worker program for agricultural workers. Tomato growers claimed Congress' ending the braceros program would wipe out 85% of the growers. Instead, over less than a decade, they found ways to eliminate 80% of the manual labor involved in tomato growing, and production was far higher than it had been with the braceros.
It is really fear of committing capital that causes farmers to rely on cheap labor. The same is true in the hotel industry. They could cut their maid staffs drastically with robotic vacuum cleaners, more automated laundry facilities, etc. They just prefer the flexibility that delaying capital investment gives them. You can fire a bunch of illegal workers if business slows, but the bills for borrowed capital will come every month. If they had confidence in their business, they'd save money in the long run.
What a crude, inept little essay. Is there a decent editor crossing the border to help Reason?
I agree.
They also would have been in the crowd of capitalists that Jesus drove from the temple with a whip.
This whole illegal immigrant amnesty movement is part of a movement to make America a socialist country. Anybody willing to make a bet it isn't?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.