Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mjp

To truly win a war you must inflict much more damage than the enemy is willing to endure. Smart bombs are great at eliminating precise targets, but terrible at causing the awful devastation that ends wars. Seeing your cities destroyed one by one, and knowing that the enemy will not stop until you surrender completely, is what ends wars. Contrast that to the current US strategy; only destroy military targets, bend over backwards to minimize civilian casualties, persecute your own troops for politically incorrect killing of the enemy, treat enemy prisoners better than your own troops, tolerate subversive behavior from politicians and the press, demonstrate a lack of will, and be unwiling to take casualties. The bottom line is that you cannot win a war using politically correct tactics.


15 posted on 07/28/2006 8:53:35 AM PDT by BadAndy ("Loud mouth internet Rambo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BadAndy
The bottom line is that you cannot win a war using politically correct tactics.

No truer words were ever spoken!!

Questions to contemplate: How did we get to this concept of fight antiseptic, politically correct wars and WHY do our leaders continue to be blind to the futility of fighting wars in that manner?

22 posted on 07/28/2006 9:02:18 AM PDT by PISANO (Our Military will NOT tire, will NOT falter and will NOT fail...but our NATION can!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: BadAndy
One of the reasons why the U.S. has pursued this "minimize civilian casualties" approach over the last few decades is that there has been extensive research into these issues by military historians and defense experts -- and it has been concluded that in modern warfare, the "cost" of winning a major war will often exceed the "cost" of losing it.

If your intent is to eliminate an enemy who represents a threat, then destroying it completely is a great idea. But if this "enemy" is a faction within a larger society or nation, or possesses valuable resources that could be exploited by the "winner" in the war, then destroying the enemy makes no sense at all.

48 posted on 07/28/2006 9:52:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson