Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walter Cronkite created Fox News.
The American Spectator ^ | 7/28/2006 | Jeffrey Lord

Posted on 07/28/2006 10:20:55 AM PDT by aceintx

Media Matters Thanks, Uncle Walter By Jeffrey Lord Published 7/28/2006 12:07:29 AM

Walter Cronkite created Fox News.

This aspect of Mr. Cronkite's long and distinguished career as a journalist was not mentioned in this week's showing of the PBS series American Masters that saluted the veteran CBS newsman. The show, which is designed to examine "the lives, works, and creative processes of our most outstanding cultural artists," dug deep into Mr. Cronkite's life and career. He was praised (one might even say worshiped!) for his coverage of the Kennedy assassination, political conventions, Vietnam and Watergate. He was cited as a television pioneer, which he most certainly was.

Yet there was not a word about Mr. Cronkite's fundamental role as a "cultural artist" in creating Fox. The reason for this was obvious. To mention Cronkite in this regard is to say that there were many Americans who slowly came to the recognition that Cronkite -- and the men and occasional woman who were around for the creation of the modern mainstream media -- was not "the most trusted man in America." Good old "Uncle Walter" turned out to be, well, "the most trusted liberal man in America."

It is hard to pinpoint exactly when this transformation took place, and no doubt there are differences to be had on exactly when this occurred. Surely one of the most notable moments of Cronkite's liberalism being unmasked in a highly visible fashion was his now famous series on Vietnam. It was Cronkite, personally, who took to the airwaves to inform the American people not about the facts of the Vietnam War -- but rather of his quite liberal opinion about the War. (It was, in short, get out.) Former CBS reporter John Laurence was so taken with this Cronkite decision that he rhapsodized in the PBS show that it was a "breakthrough" for a journalist to "express opinion."

Well, now. It was surely news in 1968 that Cronkite would devote valuable air time to such an out front opinion on the war. But by this time conservative Americans were already well awake to the realization that this powerful new institution of television was being used in ways both subtle and not, to convey the message that there was no more enlightened or superior world view than modern American liberalism. Broadcast by broadcast it was increasingly apparent that those who disagreed or who challenged the liberal media status quo would be given either no air time or have their own views graphically misrepresented.

Physicist Fritjof Capra, in his bestseller The Tao of Physics, writes that "by the very act of focusing our attention on any one concept we create its opposite." In other words, to use the language of physics, when Mr. Cronkite's very focused liberal world view blinked into the American consciousness, its conservative polar opposite blinked into existence along with it. The problem with Cronkite and his fellow "cultural artists" is that over time there emerged what seemed to many Americans as a very, very conscious decision to shut out the conservative world view altogether or, if forced to give it air time, to misrepresent it.

Thus Barry Goldwater found himself being portrayed on the CBS News as a Nazi sympathizer. A Republican Senate move to broaden the authority of the Senate Watergate Committee to investigate not just the 1972 presidential campaign but reports of Democratic malfeasance in the presidential campaigns of 1968 and 1964 was not simply defeated in the Democratic Senate but uninvestigated completely by Cronkite's CBS. The failure of the Viet Cong Tet Offensive attacks was made out as a Communist success and an American failure, when the fact was the reverse. Later in Cronkite's career social issues such as abortion or busing were all presented with the view that the proponents were honorable, well-intentioned people with solid, sensible policy -- and those opposed either nuts or racists. It is a liberal world view of journalism that, by 2004, was so perfectly rational to CBS executives they let Dan Rather roll right ahead with a phony report on George W. Bush's national guard service.

Unwittingly, Cronkite's adamant liberal insistence of "that's the way it is" had not only created Capra's opposite concept to a liberal media. With an unexpected assist from technologies old and very new the conservative world view was blinked into a highly visible national and global existence. Rupert Murdoch's invention of Fox News was a television network waiting to happen. Suddenly, beaming into American living rooms through satellite and cable was a different world view altogether, a conservative world view that millions of Americans recognized from their every day existence in places far distance from a Manhattan TV studio populated by liberal "cultural artists" such as Cronkite. AM radio, once assumed to be close to dead air in the liberal world view, stirred to life with the presence of Rush Limbaugh and, eventually, hundreds of conservative talk show hosts in local markets. And of course the Internet appeared, allowing conservative writers such as the ones on this site to communicate instantly with a national and global audience that was once the almost exclusive preserve of Mr. Cronkite.

Mr. Cronkite's creation has shaken the world he created as a "cultural artist" to its very core. The liberal media monopoly he personified has vanished into the ether that gave it birth. Sometimes the results are amusing. The PBS program recalls the vigorous protest of Nixon Vice President Spiro Agnew about the liberal dominance of the television media in 1970, a protest that included a hint that the government should pull the broadcast licenses of offending networks. Cronkite, of course, took immediate umbrage, going out of his way to give a speech attacking Agnew's threat in a return visit to his Missouri hometown. By 2004 the media world had changed so dramatically that it was liberal Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean who called for the break-up of Fox News. There was no word from Mr. Cronkite criticizing Howard Dean.

In his retirement, Cronkite has been unabashed in his liberal sentiments. He is a semi-regular on the liberal Huffington Posts, out front attacking Christian conservatives and assailing the Bush administration policy on global warming. His view on Iraq? But of course -- get out!

Is Walter Cronkite a man who deserves to be honored for his contributions to American life? Absolutely.

But for the record, all of those contributions should be honored, however unintentional. For Fox News and every conservative radio show, magazine, website, and editorial page to succeed they had to have an audience. Walter Cronkite, with his relentless, decades-long delivery of his liberal world view as "the way it is" created that audience almost single-handedly.

Thanks, Uncle Walter. What would conservatives have done without you?

Jeffrey Lord is the author of The Borking Rebellion. A former Reagan White House political director, he lives in Pennsylvania.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; cronkite; foxnews; liberalism; mainstream; media; news; objective; opinion; thewayitwasnot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last
Is it Unkle Walter (Cronkite) or Uncle Joe (Stalin)....I can't remember....it'd hard to tell the difference....
1 posted on 07/28/2006 10:20:57 AM PDT by aceintx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aceintx

So American Spectator believes that Lyin' Cronkite's career was "long and distinguished".


Hmmmmm........ 50% right.....glad I cancelled my subscription.


2 posted on 07/28/2006 10:24:48 AM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76

I thought that was Al Gore that created Fox News??


4 posted on 07/28/2006 10:39:46 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (Never Forget the Starvation of Terri Schiavo - Leftist Liberal Loonies murdered her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

I can still remember uncle walty reporting on Khe Sanh showing the one C-130 that crashed and burned over and over again. Always saying that the Marines were soon to be defeated. What a melon head.


5 posted on 07/28/2006 10:39:55 AM PDT by tigtog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
I watched some of the PBS special. It has become clear to me that Cronkite was nothing more than the mouthpiece of false, leftist propaganda and in its core a hatred for America's traditions. Since he left CBS, Cronkite has come out of the closet as a flaming liberal and unfortunately he concealed his agenda to millions of Americans while he was on the air. Thank God for the Internet and Fox News to balance out the lies told by CBS and the other leftist media outlets. Also, Cronkite seldom told it the "way it was."
6 posted on 07/28/2006 10:43:38 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

This article suggests 1968 as the "tipping point" -- or when it became obvious that Uncle Walter was a liberal (commie sympathizer might be closer to the truth and a bit more explicit). Alan Drury's "Advise and Consent" was published in 1962. In it, there was an obvious liberal-biased talking head (I always thought this character was a knock-off of David Brinkley): Frankly Unctuous. I think Drury's was right on the mark with that character -- I think it was obvious during the Kennedy-Nixon campaign where the sympathies of the media were then and indicated where they were going. 1964 was a farce.

What's really amazing is that Ronald Reagan could successfully start his career in politics in 1966 and in California of all places and still succeed in both his races for governor and then to power through to the Presidency in the face of this growing bias. It's nice to know that Uncle Walter was suffering during all those wonderful years of liberal comeuppance!


7 posted on 07/28/2006 10:51:12 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
The non stop vicious daily attacks on our President by the MSM will be their death song. How they are going to rationalize their bias after the middle east changes( and it is , right now), ought to be a hoot. Their declining viewers and subscribers is the proof.
9 posted on 07/28/2006 11:08:20 AM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

I don't mind that Cronkite was/is a flaming liberal. I think that people with such a view on life are generally wrong and/or naive, but its their right. Of course, when you're a television news anchor speaking to millions of people about the NEWS, simple decency and morality, let alone professional integrity, require that you report facts as news, and that you label your opinion as "Commentary" or something similar, so that your viewers can differentiate between fact and opinion.

Cronkite has apparently not abided by simple decency and morality, let alone professional integrity, since at least the late 1960's. He may be a wonderful person, a great father, husband, granfather, etc., but he's also a deceptive SOB who has no integrity.


10 posted on 07/28/2006 11:29:47 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

the only thing I disagree with is that Fox is conservative, they always give equal time, the fact is that the MSM is just so slanted to the left that it makes fox seem more to the right. I believe they are the most balanced.


11 posted on 07/28/2006 11:38:44 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

Courage.


12 posted on 07/28/2006 11:42:04 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

Who lost Vietnam? Ans: Walter Cronkite

With a little help from LBJ's stupid no win strategy.


13 posted on 07/28/2006 11:51:06 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

"I don't mind that Cronkite was/is a flaming liberal. I think that people with such a view on life are generally wrong and/or naive, but its their right. Of course, when you're a television news anchor speaking to millions of people about the NEWS, simple decency and morality, let alone professional integrity, require that you report facts as news"

My problem with the pompous jackasses is the way they puff themselves up and recite from their leftist handbook that they are "Journalists' who are "Objective", "Speaking truth to Power" and "unbiased presenters of facts and events free of bias or partisanship"

Balderdash, Uncle Walter was as objective as Pol Pot!


14 posted on 07/28/2006 11:53:20 AM PDT by aceintx (How about real separation of Church & State. Get the state out of my Church!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

This article makes an excellent point.


15 posted on 07/28/2006 11:53:27 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

Good read. This guy is 90 years old so at some point soon, he will die and all his "wonderful work" will be remembered fondly. His passing and Clinton's will be two days I will rejoice.


16 posted on 07/28/2006 11:58:48 AM PDT by cmiller623 (Mayor Antonio Villa....or never mind. Los Angeles is doomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
"the only thing I disagree with is that Fox is conservative, they always give equal time, the fact is that the MSM is just so slanted to the left that it makes fox seem more to the right. I believe they are the most balanced."

What kills me about these sniveling hypocrites is that they can't figure out that by saying "Fox News is Conservative" the opposite then becomes true that the other news outlets are liberal in comparison. Once you peg one outlet as on one side of the political divide that the contrasting outlet is on the other. All the while they preen and prattle on about how "objective" they are....Give me a break!!!
17 posted on 07/28/2006 12:00:16 PM PDT by aceintx (How about real separation of Church & State. Get the state out of my Church!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

Conkrite's a commie.


18 posted on 07/28/2006 12:03:30 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

He is your typical manhattan hug and suck drooler. As long as the guys at the NYTimes think well of you, you are a made man; intellectual, funny, urbane. What a load. NYers take two airliners in the neck and are still whinning that either Bush is bad for kicking ass, or Bush is bad for not sending them enough money. The NY Elite are pantywaists. The real world to them is whose cocktail party they are invited to.


19 posted on 07/28/2006 12:05:35 PM PDT by tigtog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984

"It has become clear to me that Cronkite was nothing more than the mouthpiece of false, leftist propaganda and in its core a hatred for America's traditions."

Clear to you and me of course, but did the MBB1984 bankrolled "Public" Broadcasting System production even HINT at Cronkite's all so obvious left-wing, anti-American bias?


20 posted on 07/28/2006 12:08:20 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: woodmack
"Oh, my lord, Jeffrey--what is it with you people? What Cronkite did regarding Vietnam (and other issues) is inform the American people that what he was observing and reporting on was at variance with statements made repeatedly by the American government. He pointed out the mischaracterizations and lies of both democratic and republican administrations. The significance of this? Commercial television news had never before aggressively contradicted official versions of events in such a way as to galvanize the attention of the public. Today's TV news is only marginally better in holding the Bush administration's feet to the fire regarding its outrageous falsehoods about Iraq (not to mention other issue areas). Shame on you for the adolescence you (and 'The Spectator') flaunt as conservatism." You have some valid points Woodmack and had Uncle joe...er...Walter come out and said that what he was doing is editorializing not just presenting the facts...that he was presenting one set of facts while burying any facts that stood in the way of his opposition to the war and to what our government was doing...What made him wrong...and what infuriates me about the present frauds in the media today is that they instist that they are being objective and presenting both sides of the argument equally!!!
It's a lie...and those that say it are liars...as was Uncle Joe...er...Walter.

If you doubt his leftist bent....just go to the liberal Huffington Post and read his rants when he's there! By the way...your rant identifies you as a defeat and retreat whiner in the WOT who wouldn't know a left wing news anchor if he jumped up and bit him!
22 posted on 07/28/2006 12:58:57 PM PDT by aceintx (How about real separation of Church & State. Get the state out of my Church!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

You have some valid points Woodmack and had Uncle joe...er...Walter come out and said that what he was doing is editorializing not just presenting the facts...that he was presenting one set of facts while burying any facts that stood in the way of his opposition to the war and to what our government was doing...What made him wrong...and what infuriates me about the present frauds in the media today is that they instist that they are being objective and presenting both sides of the argument equally!!!
It's a lie...and those that say it are liars...as was Uncle Joe...er...Walter.

If you doubt his leftist bent....just go to the liberal Huffington Post and read his rants when he's there! By the way...your rant identifies you as a defeat and retreat whiner in the WOT who wouldn't know a left wing news anchor if he jumped up and bit him!


23 posted on 07/28/2006 1:00:03 PM PDT by aceintx (How about real separation of Church & State. Get the state out of my Church!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
You must not have read the rest of the article. The "long and distinguished" part was clearly tongue in cheek.
24 posted on 07/28/2006 1:08:17 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
I've been preaching that for years now. So few get it. Some Freepers are SO disappointed when a more liberal reporter appears on FOX. As long as they keep trying to present balance I'll be tickled pink. That's a thousand times better than the way it used to be.
25 posted on 07/28/2006 1:12:13 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aceintx
This pretty well says it all:


26 posted on 07/28/2006 1:16:35 PM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

"You must not have read the rest of the article. The "long and distinguished" part was clearly tongue in cheek."


Oh, but I did.



I read it as "long and distinguished".........

BUT

THEN, the FOX point was made.




My take is that the inital descriptors were a wimpy attempt to soften the blow.


27 posted on 07/28/2006 1:24:28 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

"You must not have read the rest of the article. The "long and distinguished" part was clearly tongue in cheek."


Oh, but I did.



I read it as "long and distinguished".........

BUT

THEN, the FOX point was made.

There was also this:


"Is Walter Cronkite a man who deserves to be honored for his contributions to American life? Absolutely."



My take is that the inital descriptors were a wimpy attempt to soften the blow.


28 posted on 07/28/2006 1:25:52 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
No it certainly did not give any hint of Cronkite's left wing, anti-American bias. In the parts that I viewed, negative views (i.e. the real truth) was completely omitted. The piece was only a series of congratulatory statements and interviews of Cronkite's achievements (i.e. "saying it like it was" by the "most trusted man in America.")

It was clearly a blatant propaganda piece of leftist drivel. And, I indeed paid for part of it.
29 posted on 07/28/2006 1:31:18 PM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: aceintx
I watched the documentary on Wlater Cronkite and as the writer basically said it would make Monica blush at the sycophancy of the program.

And guess who got his mug put on in the documentary, John McCain.

The guy is shameless in his bee line to the liberal media cameras.

30 posted on 07/28/2006 1:31:54 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
I think liberals have to lie because if they give honest info and present the truth the only ones that would still be democrats are the moonbats.

I am completely confident in allowing the liberal and conservative view to be presented
because when that happens the liberals don't stand a chance
31 posted on 07/28/2006 1:37:22 PM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Look upon thy works, Uncle Walter, and despair!


32 posted on 07/28/2006 1:55:44 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"And guess who got his mug put on in the documentary, John McCain."

I watched as much of it as I could stomach but missed the McGoo...er....McCain part....I can't say I'm surprised the McGoo..er....McCain was in front of the National People's Broadcasting cameras....I assume he was gushing in his praise for Uncle Joe...er...Uncle Walter?
33 posted on 07/28/2006 1:56:34 PM PDT by aceintx (How about real separation of Church & State. Get the state out of my Church!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: aceintx
I watched as much of it as I could stomach but missed the McGoo...er....McCain part....I can't say I'm surprised the McGoo..er....McCain was in front of the National People's Broadcasting cameras....I assume he was gushing in his praise for Uncle Joe...er...Uncle Walter?

He was at the vwry end, and I don't blame you for not watching the whole thing, katie couric's narration makes nails on the blackboard sound soothing.

34 posted on 07/28/2006 2:06:23 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

Al Gore and Walt Cronkite are brothers, like no others,
and truly deserve each other....Jake


35 posted on 07/28/2006 2:13:40 PM PDT by sanjacjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All; aceintx; LS; TonyRo76; tigtog; bybybill; MBB1984; ReleaseTheHounds; onedoug; ...


.


NEVER FORGET


..'Anti-Freedom for All'.. WALTER CRONKITE's nightly misreporting of our fight for Freedom for a then Free South Vietnam long ago...

...brought for all of us to sadly see in the end:



Pictures of a vietnamese Re-Education Camp

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308949/posts



Years later, at a London World Conference in the year 2000, WALTER CRONKITE publically called for our 11 Southern States to SECEDE from our country's precious Union..!!


Kinda shows you where he's always been coming from..?


For...

...the Enemy is now within,

...and always has been.


And now WALTER CRONKITE is Election year 2008 Presidential Candidate HILLARY's No. 1 TV defensive linebacker..?

And they want back inside our Oval Office in the WORST of ways.


The very WORST.



Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer
Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965

http://www.WeWereSoldiers.com

http://www.lzxray.com/guyer_set1.htm

http://www.lzxray.com/guyer_collection


NEVER FORG


36 posted on 07/28/2006 8:15:25 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

Nyuk,nyuk,nyuk!


37 posted on 07/28/2006 8:18:22 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

Excellent!


38 posted on 07/28/2006 8:22:21 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
....As long as they keep trying to present balance I'll be tickled pink. That's a thousand times better than the way it used to be.

FOX has actually, even kinda re-tooled Geraldo Rivera so ya' don't feel like kicking his ass every time ya' see him.

Amazing!

39 posted on 07/28/2006 8:53:09 PM PDT by Bullish ( The pig headed monkeys of Islam can kiss my grits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tokra; Carl/NewsMax; Judicial Watch; kristinn; LS; All


.


We just LOVE your happy CLINTON family photo portrait that WALTER CRONKITE helped them stage on his boat at Martha's Vineyard, at their instructions, for the country's benefit during CLINTON's Impeachment saga.

A family photo event staged to show family unity just a couple of days after President CLINTON's TV confession about MONICA at the White House.

A photo that http://www.Newsmax.com was able to re-produce and promote later on, in national TV appearances, to counter HILLARY's 'Living History' book lie telling us that after that same MONICA confession no one in the CLINTON family would come close to BILL for months ..except his good dog Buddy.

Pictures speak louder than words, it seems..?


A flagrant book lie that was nailed so well with this photo that it had caught HILLARY napping. She then felt compelled to make excuses for this same Sailboat Family photo in appearances on TV interview shows like CBS' 'The DAVID LETTERMAN Show.' HILLARY even went so far as to bring this photo up twice during her interview with DAVE, saying that this whole thing was WALTER CRONKITE's idea ..not hers ..when it was all hers..!!

A photo contradiction that was first caught by this particular Freeper in his call into Newsmax.com Columnist CARL LIMBACHER as he was guesting on'The Judicial Watch Talk Radio Show.'

CARL then promised to locate this photo and post it on Newsmax.com as soon as he could. This was done in a matter of hours. And the rest is REAL History, thanks to CARL.

GOD Bless the Internet and Talk Radio/TV.


.


40 posted on 07/28/2006 9:20:07 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

Thanks for the ping!


41 posted on 07/28/2006 9:23:55 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
Cronkite has apparently not abided by simple decency and morality, let alone professional integrity, since at least the late 1960's. He may be a wonderful person, a great father, husband, granfather, etc., but he's also a deceptive SOB who has no integrity.

I had always liked him because of his involvement with the space program. What a disappointment to find out what a despicable person he really is. I wonder how many of our soldier's deaths can be attributed to his biased reporting.

42 posted on 07/28/2006 9:33:27 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

.


Thank YOU, Alamo Girl,


...for your ever present CLARITY.

.




43 posted on 07/28/2006 9:36:53 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: aceintx
I never liked Cronkite, Huntley and Brinkley were much better.


44 posted on 07/28/2006 9:56:03 PM PDT by John Lenin (It was like going to church, except Ozzy Osbourne was there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aceintx

I don't know whether Cronkite is a secret communist, or just another unpatriotic numbskull liberal.

Numbskull liberals believe:

1. Whatever the American Government decides to do in foreign affairs must be wrong.

2) If social programs are failing, we need to spend more money on those programs.

3. We are evolving into a wonderful human race. We just need to exterminate or forcefully reeducate any conservatives who oppose our brave new world.


45 posted on 07/28/2006 10:19:33 PM PDT by Rocky (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr; All

.

WALTER CRONKITE = DAN RATHER


DAVID SHAW: RATHER's work 'Shoddy, slipshod' not LIBERAL..?

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1227809/posts

.


46 posted on 07/28/2006 10:20:26 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; All

.


Despite the continuous media lies of one WALTER CRONKITE,

...when all is said and done:



MEL's -PASSION- was sparked by -WE WERE SOLDIERS-

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1085111/posts

.


47 posted on 07/28/2006 10:32:01 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984; EyeGuy
OK, I get it. The use of facetious language is sometimes lost on those who read literally. The entire content of the article disparages everything about Waltie and his "distinguished" career. The author is clearly saying that the only real contribution Walt made is that his extreme liberal view and agenda gave birth to an inevitable conservative backlash that we are enjoying today.

If you read it again I think you'll see what I mean.
48 posted on 07/29/2006 5:31:07 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

ditto


49 posted on 07/29/2006 5:32:02 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
"I don't know whether Cronkite is a secret communist, or just another unpatriotic numbskull liberal."

There's a difference?
50 posted on 07/29/2006 9:17:30 AM PDT by aceintx (How about real separation of Church & State. Get the state out of my Church!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson