Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LA Times Columnist Slams Intelligent Design as a "Ruse" and a "Ploy"
Newsbusters.org ^ | 30 July 2006 | Dave Pierre

Posted on 07/30/2006 12:56:40 PM PDT by infoguy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-312 last
To: metmom
Then what you call science isn't really science unless you can tell us about the source of the designer.

Living things are designed by the same nature that builds snowflakes. If you choose to believe God set it up this way I have no problem with that belief.

But the history of the building of the living snowflake is as described by science, regardless of the ultimate cause.

301 posted on 08/02/2006 4:54:43 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: DennisR
Okay - just cut to the chase. Tell me what your idea of Intelligent Design is if you do not mind.

While I do not endorse any explanation termed as "intelligent design" as an established scientific theory, the explanation of "Intelligent Design" as stated by the man who originated the concept and effectively spearheaded the movement -- Michael Behe -- is that life originated from a common ancestor form and diversified through descent with modification combined with isolated environmental pressures as suggested by the theory of evolution, but at certain points in the development of various species an intelligent "designer" of unspecified origin and with unspecified motives intervened and, through unspecified processes, 'designed' specific biological structures which -- as asserted by those who endorse intelligent design -- could not have emerged as a result of mutation and selection alone.
302 posted on 08/02/2006 5:51:05 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: DennisR
Things have just turned for the worse, now, haven't they? Is this the story you believe?


African Bushmen Creation Story

People did not always live on the surface of the earth. At one time people and animals lived underneath the earth with Kaang, the Great Master and Lord of All Life. In this place people and animals lived together peacefully. They understood each other. No one ever wanted for anything and it was always light even though there wasn't any sun. During this time of bliss Kaang began to plan the wonders he would put in the world above.

First Kaang created a wondrous tree, with branches stretching over the entire country. At the base of the tree he dug a hole that reached all the way down into the world where the people and animals lived. After he had finished furnishing the world as he pleased he led the first man up the hole. He sat down on the edge of the hole and soon the first woman came up out of it. Soon all the people were gathered at the foot of the tree, awed by the world they had just entered. Next, Kaang began helping the animals climb out of the hole. In their eagerness some of the animals found a way to climb up through the tree's roots and come out of the branches. They continued racing out of the world beneath until all of the animals were out.

Kaang gathered all the people and animals about him. He instructed them to live together peacefully. Then he turned to the men and women and warned them not to build any fires or a great evil would befall them. They gave their word and Kaang left to where he could watch his world secretly.

As evening approached the sun began to sink beneath the horizon. The people and animals stood watching this phenomenon, but when the sun disappeared fear entered the hearts of the people. They could no longer see each other as they lacked the eyes of the animals which were capable of seeing in the dark. They lacked the warm fur of the animals also and soon grew cold. In desperation one man suggested that they build a fire to keep warm. Forgetting Kaang's warning they disobeyed him. They soon grew warm and were once again able to see each other.

However the fire frightened the animals. They fled to the caves and mountains and ever since the people broke Kaang's command people have not been able to communicate with animals. Now fear has replaced the seat friendship once held between the two groups.


303 posted on 08/02/2006 7:49:40 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

Comment #304 Removed by Moderator

To: Theo
Step back and consider the complexity in this world, in a mere flagellum, in your thoughts, in human interaction, in photosynthesis, in the way a wound heals, and so on. And you are so bold to say that it's badly done?

"Bad" is relative, but it's clearly suboptimal, especially for an allegedly omnipotent and omniescent creator. Positing a non-omnipotent creator gets around some of these issues, but that doesn't seem to be popular.

305 posted on 08/02/2006 6:20:29 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Nothing random except the source. Is that kind of like "nothing is holding up my house except the foundation"?

Flip a coin 1000 times and count the number of heads. Repeat this million times and plot the distribution of the number of heads. Each flip is random; the bell curve you end up with isn't.

306 posted on 08/02/2006 6:24:35 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
How many times do we hear the excuse that evolution doesn't address origins?

Get it through your defense mechanisms, Dave. Evolution doesn't address the history of pre-cellular life. Darwin explicitly left this mystery to religion.

There are biologists studying this, but it isn't part of TOE.

Nothing random except the source. Is that kind of like "nothing is holding up my house except the foundation"?

No Dave. The games at Las Vegas are very carefully crafted to be as random as it is possible for physical systems to be, and yet the outcome is always the same. The house makes a profit at the end of the day.

Mutations may or may not be purely random, but it doesn't matter. Some variations are more successful at reproduction than others. Selection shapes.

307 posted on 08/02/2006 6:39:25 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

Comment #308 Removed by Moderator

To: bland fare
Interesting question. Are you saying the poster can't falsify his position?

No. I was asking if the previous poster if a question asked was an actual point of contention. I made no statement regarding the falsifiability of any position.

If so then, (according to current scientific thought, especially those who advocate evolution) the position that the human mind can understand nature is not a scientific position. Therefore, trying to formulate a "natural" explanation of the existense of life through the human mind can't possibly be scientific.

By extension, evolution can't be scientific.


As your starting premise is false, your conclusion is faulty.
309 posted on 08/02/2006 7:09:08 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

Comment #310 Removed by Moderator

To: bland fare
I'll just take it that you accept the position that the human mind can understand human nature is a tautology (since you know this positon can't be falsified) and leave it at that.

This is one of the reasons that all of science is tentative, and never claimed as absolute truth. However, if humans are actually incapable of understanding nature, then all fields of study are meaningless, not just science.
311 posted on 08/02/2006 7:55:40 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Getready

Interestingly, yesterday someone sent me an article making the exact opposite criticism of "naturalists."
See http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n2/God-natural-law#fnMark3_1


312 posted on 09/13/2006 11:20:03 AM PDT by drl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-312 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson