Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Adminstration Pursuing Globalist Agenda
Human Events ^ | July 31 2006 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 07/31/2006 3:05:40 PM PDT by Reagan Man

The hottest issue at the grass roots is illegal immigration and what our government is not doing to stop it. The question most frequently heard is, "Why doesn't the Bush administration get it?"

Maybe the Bush administration doesn't want to stop the invasion of illegal immigrants and plans to solve the problem by just declaring them all legal through amnesty and guest-worker proposals. Maybe the Bush administration is pursuing a globalist agenda. Consider this chronology.

On March 23, 2005, President Bush met at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, with Vicente Fox of Mexico and Paul Martin of Canada in what they called a summit. The three heads of state then drove to Baylor University in Waco, Texas, where they issued a press release announcing their signing of an agreement to form the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

On May 17, 2005, the Council on Foreign Relations issued a 59-page document outlining a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter" to achieve "the freer flow of people within North America."

This document is full of language spelling out an "integrated" strategy to achieve an "open border for the movement of goods and people" within which "trade, capital, and people flow freely." The document calls for "a seamless North American market," allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access," "totalization" (the code word for putting illegal immigrants into the U.S. Social Security system), massive U.S. foreign aid, and even "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution."

Tying this document into the Bush-Fox-Martin March 23 Summit, the Council of Foreign Relations stated that the three men on that day "committed their governments" to the North American community goal, and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

On June 9, 2005, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Richard Lugar, R-Ind., held a friendly committee hearing that featured task force member Robert Pastor, a professor at American University and author of the 2001 book "Toward a North American Community" (Institute for International Economics, $28). He revealed further details of the plan for a "continental perimeter," including "an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure that includes new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors."

Pastor asserted that President Bush endorsed North American integration in the Guanajuato Proposal of February 16, 2001, in which Bush and Fox promised that "we will strive to consolidate a North American economic community." Bush followed up on April 22, 2001, by signing the Declaration of Quebec City in which he made a "commitment to hemispheric integration."

On June 27, 2005, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff attended a North American Security and Prosperity Partnership meeting in Ottawa at which he said, "We want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a press release endorsing the Ottawa report and calling the meeting "an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

In July 2005, the White House let it be known that it is backing a coalition called Americans for Border and Economic Security organized by former Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie. Its purpose is to conduct a political-style campaign to sell the American people on a guest-worker program wrapped in a few border-security promises and financed by coalition members who each put up $50,000 to $250,000.

On March 31 President Bush met at Cancun, Mexico, for a spring frolic with Fox and the new Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Their press release celebrated what they called the first anniversary of the partnership, and Bush demanded that Congress pass an immigration bill with a worker permit program.

On May 15 Bush made a nationally televised speech in which he enunciated the amazing non sequitur that we can't have border security unless we also have a "comprehensive" bill including legalization of illegal immigrants now in the United States and the admission of new so-called guest workers.

Thanks to the investigative work of Jerome R. Corsi, we have learned that the partnership's more than 20 working groups are already quietly operating in the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the U.S. Department of Commerce, which refuses to reveal the groups' members because, in the words of partnership spokeswoman Geri Word, the Bush administration does not want them "distracted by calls from the public."

Corsi discovered recently that the partnership issued a "Report to Leaders" on June 27, 2005, that shows the partnership's extensive interaction with government and business groups in the three countries.

On June 15, 2006, the partnership's North American Competitiveness Council, consisting of government officials and corporate chief executive officers from the three countries, met to "institutionalize the partnership and the North American Competitiveness Council, so that the work will continue through changes in administrations."

The Bush administration is using a series of press releases, without authority from Congress or the American people, to shift us into the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership with "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; battyarticle; borders; cuespookymusic; geopolitics; globalism; globalistsundermybed; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; morethorzineplease; nau; northamericanunion; schlafly; spp; term2; theboogeyman; tinfoilalert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: Ben Ficklin

Its more like the radical left against American citizen. Who do you think is funding the radical redefiniton of the American system?


41 posted on 07/31/2006 5:47:13 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

You must be selling buggy whips still, I take it.


42 posted on 07/31/2006 5:51:16 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You must be selling out this country, I take it.


43 posted on 07/31/2006 5:55:07 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government.

Otay, I'll bite. Which of the three countries is run by an oligarchy of spaniards? Which of the three countries is looking toward communism.
44 posted on 07/31/2006 5:55:20 PM PDT by lost_sovereignty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Nope. I buy almost exclusively American. Clothes, shoes, cars, tools, you name it. I specify millions of dollars worth of electrical gear each year, and almost always limit it to US made products. I do my part to support the local companies around here.

I assume you do the same.


45 posted on 07/31/2006 5:58:35 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant

That being said, why do you say the author of this article is 'getting batty'?


46 posted on 07/31/2006 6:12:00 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Bush has done as much or more to put the UN and the One Worlders in their place than any president ever has.

So THAT's why we rejoined UNESCO?

47 posted on 07/31/2006 6:13:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; COEXERJ145
Inside the Ragin' Cajun's truly bizarre crystal ball
48 posted on 07/31/2006 6:17:49 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Becasue nothing about lowering tarrifs and improving trade between Canada and Mexico and the US is threatening to the US economy. I always prefer to buy american, but that's just me. I made sure the wash machine I bought the other day was built here, instead of Mexico, but I'm not in favor of requiring companies to not make stuff in Mexico.

If all the people that talk about how awful it is to see manufacturing jobs go overseas or to Mexico did what I do, those companies would think twice about relocating plants. But the bottom line is companies are created to get a profit for those who invest in them, not to offer lifetime work for a group of employees. If people want to get $15 shoes instead of $90 pairs, so be it. It frees up their capital to invest or spend money at the local pub, giving the brewery owners and publicans a handsome profit.

The tighter you squeeze, the more sand that will slip through your fingers.


49 posted on 07/31/2006 6:24:02 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Buchanan

He's an anti-semite, you'll have to pull another rabbit outta yer hat.

Ain't but one card left to play......

50 posted on 07/31/2006 6:25:25 PM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

What are you trying to say?


51 posted on 07/31/2006 6:32:21 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pissant
But the bottom line is companies are created to get a profit for those who invest in them

Think about the investment the American people make in American corporations for a moment. That investment includes supporting a government system that grants corporations their charter and PAYS very heavily, through taxes and our sense of civic duty, for a court system that protects them through the rule of law. We also provide military protection for them when they operate outside of our nation and our men and women sometimes give their lives to grant them that privilege.

Now, what do we get back for our investment (which is of nearly incalculable value)?
52 posted on 07/31/2006 6:37:00 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

BUMP


53 posted on 07/31/2006 6:38:05 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

I am saying that you and Hugo Chavez are natural allies.


54 posted on 07/31/2006 6:42:16 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
He would say, Hegelian dialectic.
55 posted on 07/31/2006 6:47:03 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Hugo Chavez and you both are pushing "free trade". That would make you blood brothers, I should think.


56 posted on 07/31/2006 6:48:19 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Chavez is opposed to FTAA, the same as you.


57 posted on 07/31/2006 6:52:29 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Did Bush suspend the abortion $ that was going to in foreign aid, reversing a clintoon exec order?

Did Bush unilaterally withdraw from the ABM?

Did Bush reject the Kyoto protocol against world condemnations?

Did Bush give the harshest speech to the UN it ever received in the lead up to the Iraq war?

Did Bush appoint John Bolton over the UN's and the Dems vociferous objections?

Did Bush unilaterally reject the International Criminal Court?

Is Bush the only world leader giving Israel cover to wipe out Hezbollah?

Did Bush give in and stop the NSA surveillance program because europe complained?

Did Bush conquer Iraq despite the UN telling him not to invade?

Did Bush allow bombings of a terrorist pow-wow accross the Pakistani border without UN approval?

Did he allow a hellfire missile to take out some terror scum in Yemen w/o UN approval of an attack on yemeni soil?

Did Bush put up steel tarrifs for a year despite the gnashing of teeth from the GATT and our allies?

Did Bush play hardball with the Canadians on soft lumber for the last 5 years? Did Bush play hardball with the canadians on salmon fishing harvests in 2001/2002?

Is Bush pushing for nuclear power plants, more coal plants and drilling in ANWR despite the howls of the global warming cretins and envirowackos?

Do our troops operate anywhere in the world under the UN banner or did Bush sign an executive order prohibiting it?

Is Bush heeding the UN and other world critics about the need to ban the death penalty?

Did Bush close down Guantanamo or any other prison despite the international condemnation?

Did Bush send Rummy to NATO to get along with the status quo or to pull it out of its stupor?

Did Bush sit down for one on one talks with NoKo because Kofi Annan and the globalists said he must?

Is Bush offering Japan and Israel and Australia and Britain our missile defense systems because Russia and China approve?

Did Bush and Cheney call Putin on the carpet because it would smooth international relations?

Who, besides Bush and the Pope, call on China to open up to political and religious freedom?

Who was the only president to EXPLICITLY say we will defend Taiwan against a chinese aggression?

Which world leader told the UN to pound sand and caused it's gun grabbing conference on small arms control to flop?

Who said that we will treat any regime that sponsors terrorists the same as the terrorists themselves?

Who is the only world leader pushing hard to isloate Iran over the nuclear program?

Did Bush allow the execution of Mexican criminals over the screeching objections of the Mexican gov't?

Who is pushing for massive UN reform?

Who has been insisting on a constitutional amendment against gay marriage.

Who spearheaded the arms shipment interception policy with a handful of other countries that did not ask the UN for approval, and which led to busting Kaddafi?

Which country is putting the kabash on UN talks regarding international taxation?

Who is having troops operate in the horn of Africa w/o UN approval?

Which leader has called the islamo fascists islamo fascists?

Is Bush content with the status quo in the ME or is he ramrodding changes down their throats?

Has Bush lifted the sanctions on Cuba due to international pressure, or did he up the fines to Americans that travel there?

Did Bush cave into the euroweenies who complained about the size of the corporate tax cuts he signed into law?

Globalist my ass.


58 posted on 07/31/2006 7:19:12 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Well you asked about willie, I just told you who his hero was.

But I don't care to know who yours is, anymore than you care to know mine.


59 posted on 07/31/2006 7:20:24 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

You get nothing back from me unless you are invested in my company. My taxes pay for the gov't to operate. The gov't has no wealth, it only takes the wealth that is created by individuals and businesses & re-distributes it.


60 posted on 07/31/2006 7:27:03 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson