Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surgeon General Carmona Leaves Post (Dancing in the streets alert!)
United Pro Smoker's Newsletter ^ | uly 31, 2006 | KEVIN FREKING

Posted on 08/01/2006 4:15:27 AM PDT by SheLion

WASHINGTON -- Quietly leaving his post as surgeon general, Dr. Richard Carmona said he would judge himself successful if he had persuaded one student to make good health choices or one mother to stop smoking.

Carmona's report condemning secondhand smoke was a hallmark of his tenure as the nation's 17th surgeon general.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: addiction; anti; antismokers; augusta; bans; bigbrother; budget; bush43; butts; camel; caribou; carmona; chicago; cigar; cigarettes; cigarettetax; commerce; emphysema; epa; fda; governor; health; individual; interstate; kool; lawmakers; lewiston; liberty; lungdisease; maine; mainesmokers; marlboro; msa; nannystate; nannystatism; nannystatists; niconazis; osha; pallmall; pipe; portland; prosmoker; pufflist; quitsmoking; regulation; rico; rights; rinos; ryo; sales; senate; smokers; smoking; smokingbans; smokingisbad; stoogeingeneral; taxes; term2; tobacco; winston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-281 next last
The liar leaves town!  Couldn't stand the heat, I would imagine, coming from his filthy lies about second hand smoke killing everyone.

If anyone can't see why he is running with his tail between his legs is still living in the dark ages!

The Liar Leaves the White House!

1 posted on 08/01/2006 4:15:33 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; CSM; ...
Sure made MY day!!!!!


2 posted on 08/01/2006 4:16:41 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Dancing in the streets because of one guy quitting his job that advocates quitting smoking as a healthy choice????
3 posted on 08/01/2006 4:18:09 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
While smokers trade insults like childern, the adults in charge make their world smaller and smaller each day.


4 posted on 08/01/2006 4:20:59 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Dancing in the streets because of one guy quitting his job that advocates quitting smoking as a healthy choice????

Not at all.  But if you have been following him and his lies about second hand smoke, then you would understand why we are so happy to see him leaving.

If he was a firm believer in what he said about shs, he would stand tall.  But I guess he couldn't take the heat of his lies and is leaving. 

And that is just what he is!  A big liar!

None of us advocates smoking as a healthy choice in life, but there are a lot worse things adults can do with themselves.  Cigarettes are a legal commodity.  And no one can ever produce a death certificate that second hand smoke ever killed ANYONE!


5 posted on 08/01/2006 4:21:54 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Dancing in the streets because of one guy quitting his job that advocates quitting smoking as a healthy choice????

Uh oh. INCOMING!!!!!!

6 posted on 08/01/2006 4:22:00 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
If you remember back when idiot Koop was the Surgeon General and the courts put him and David Keesler on the stand about their lies about smoking, they took the fifth.  Because they couldn't tell the truth, and they took the 5th like the lying cowards they were.

Koop resigned soon after that and even went bankrupt.  I see he is making money now with his life alert on a TV ad.  But we smokers will never forget the lies he and David Keesler were spewing back in his day about cigarettes.  And since he couldn't produce the truth, he too, left with his tail between his legs.

7 posted on 08/01/2006 4:24:21 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
"Smokers Rights neither promotes smoking nor denies the health risks of smoking. Instead, we defend the interests of adults who choose to smoke; we promote freedom of choice for employers and proprietors who wish to accommodate smokers on their premises; and we speak out against those who want to discriminate against smokers or ban smoking completely. Last but not least, we promote greater courtesy and tolerance between smokers and non-smokers.
8 posted on 08/01/2006 4:25:51 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Carmona's term expired over the weekend with no announcement from the Health and Human Services Department. The department did send out an internal memo from Assistant Health Secretary John Agwunobi saying he regretted Carmona's term was up, and on Monday a letter Carmona wrote to his fellow officers of the U.S. Public Health Service began to circulate on Capitol Hill.


9 posted on 08/01/2006 4:26:42 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
DON'T LET THE HEADLINES FOOL YOU
Court throws out challenge to EPA findings on secondhand smoke - (December 2002) - The ruling was based on the highly technical grounds that since the EPA didn't actually enact any new regulations (it merely declared ETS to be a carcinogen without actually adopting any new rules), the court had no jurisdiction to rule in the matter.  This court ruling on the EPA report is NOT a stamp of approval for that report. Judge Osteen's criticisms of the EPA report are still completely valid and is accompanied by other experts.

The Illinois Clean Air Act, banning smoking in public and government buildings and on public transportation has been in effect for over 15 years.  This is not an issue about smoking in public buildings....it is about removing the rights of private businesses...restaurants and bars and smoking outdoors.   Most people don't even understand what these intrusive bans are about and it is being implied that everyone smokes everywhere.  That hasn't been the case for a long, long time.  

Oak Ridge Labs, TN & SECOND HAND SMOKE 

Statistics and Data Sciences Group Projects

I think any anti who tries to dismiss the findings of the U.S. Department of Energy labs at Oak Ridge, should be confronted with the question: "Are you saying that DOE researchers committed scientific fraud and that their findings on ETS exposure are untrue?" But where does this Taliban-like anti-smoking campaign come from? It can't really be this stuff about second-hand smoke. The famous 1992 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) study showing a causal relationship between second-hand smoke and cancer was so roundly debunked as junk science (even by other federal agencies) it was finally declared "null and void" by a federal judge. Sure, second-hand smoke can be annoying, and it can't be healthy, but if you relegate smokers to their own enclosed space _ say a bar or a separate part of a restaurant where people, including staff, only go of their own free will _ who can object?


10 posted on 08/01/2006 4:29:55 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Carmona's term expired over the weekend with no announcement from the Health and Human Services Department. The department did send out an internal memo from Assistant Health Secretary John Agwunobi saying he regretted Carmona's term was up, and on Monday a letter Carmona wrote to his fellow officers of the U.S. Public Health Service began to circulate on Capitol Hill.

More smoke and mirrors.


11 posted on 08/01/2006 4:31:58 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

The problem with Washington and smoking is all the revenue generated by smoking.

So instead of banning cigarettes like they have with other substances, they complain about it...get their Surgeons General to comdemn the activity, but they will never never ban it.

I am not saying they should ban it, but either sh*t or get off the pot. It is a legal substance, period, case closed.


12 posted on 08/01/2006 4:32:50 AM PDT by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
None of us advocates smoking as a healthy choice in life, but there are a lot worse things adults can do with themselves. Cigarettes are a legal commodity. And no one can ever produce a death certificate that second hand smoke ever killed ANYONE!

Has smoking ever been put on a death certificate as the cause of death?

13 posted on 08/01/2006 4:34:27 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
American Cancer Society catches the Surgeon General in an outright lie...
United Pro Smoker's Newsletter ^ | July 1, 2006

The Surgeon General showed up very regal looking to provide a press release rehashing the tired old argument that secondhand smoke is deadly and must be banned. And with his next statement:

Separate "no smoking" sections DO NOT protect you from secondhand smoke. Neither does filtering the air or opening a window.

It seemed a feeble attempt to pre-empt any action short of a total smoking ban.....as if to confirm that pro-smoking ban activists' credibility in the public is failing miserably.

Well I am sorry to report that the American Cancer Society conducted air quality testing at several smoking venues which prove the Surgeon General flat out wrong.



Take a look at the above table, do you see the 20 reading? It represents a restaurant with an enclosed (separate) smoking area. And the 20 is actually 20 nanograms, a nanogram is 10 (-9).

So......let me put a number to that nanogram for you: 0.000000020 of a gram/cubic meter was the secondhand smoke concentration for the restaurant with the enclosed smoking area. Which is 25,000 times SAFER than OSHA regulations for the secondhand smoke measured airborne component. Thus the American Cancer Society destroys the Surgeon General's and RWJF (Nicoderm) funded James Repace argument that seperation and ventilation don't work.

The Surgeon General can stomp his feet, and scream at the top of his lungs...like a little Napoleon "....because I said so....." all he wants. But it doesn't change the facts........and the facts show he is telling a bold faced lie to the American public.
Read

14 posted on 08/01/2006 4:36:32 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

15 posted on 08/01/2006 4:38:08 AM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Has smoking ever been put on a death certificate as the cause of death?

Never!  We have been trying like crazy for someone to produce a death certificate stating that smoking was the cause of death.  Or even second hand smoke.  But to no avail. 

When the Federal Coroner signs a death certificate, he can not, under his oath, sign this document that smoking and shs was the cause of death, because to this day, there is no proof.

Sure, smoking might have contributed to a person's death, but there are many other factors involved.  Was the person obese?  An alcoholic?  Was he a couch potato?  Was he predestined to having cancer because of generics?  A lot comes into play and one cannot just blame the death on smoking.

Guaranteed, it might have been a contributing factor, but smoking can not be the sole blame for a person's death.

Smokers far outlive an obese person.  Smoking isn't good but neither is being obese.

But smoking is legal and over eating is legal.  Each person has to be responsible for themselves.  But smokers and the obese are not criminals!

16 posted on 08/01/2006 4:43:47 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

It is a four year term: 2002 +4 ='s 2006

Senate Confirms Carmona as Surgeon General

NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, July 24, 2002

WASHINGTON – By a vote of 98-0, the full Senate Tuesday confirmed Richard H. Carmona as U.S. surgeon general.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/7/23/144124.shtml


17 posted on 08/01/2006 4:48:01 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Most SGs want to leave a legacy of scaremongering. Otherwise, the nanny state would be no more.
18 posted on 08/01/2006 4:52:40 AM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

RESEARCHERS BLAST CALIFORNIA EPA REPORT: SECONDHAND SMOKE FINDINGS BIASED, FLAWED

01/30/2006-The American Cancer Society stated unequivocally, in a written comment,  that it did not agree with Cal-EPA's conclusion that secondhand smoke was a cause of breast cancer, and that published evidence did not support the requisite criteria for causation.

19 posted on 08/01/2006 4:56:22 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The World Health Organization actually did a study on secondhand smoke which showed that it doesn't even make people sick, much less kill them. Now, it makes people uncomfortable. They don't like it. I don't like secondhand cigarette smoke myself -- it reeks -- but it doesn't kill. It doesn't. 

Claims of secondhand smoke risks don't pass science test
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 01/4/06
Articles, editorials, op-eds and published letters in the pages of many of New Jersey's newspapers have been heavily lopsided in support of the effort to ban smoking in bars and restaurants. Each article or commentary seemingly has been designed to leave the reader with the perception that the supportive evidence presented is undeniable or that no contrary findings or opinion even exist.

Any claim that exposure to exhaled or sidestream smoke poses a threat to life is "indisputable" is false. There are studies and scientists who dispute it strongly. When New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg claimed his ban would save 1,000 workers' lives, the president of the American Council on Science and Health, who vehemently opposes smoking, wrote, "There is no evidence that any New Yorker — patron or employee — has ever died as a result of exposure to smoke in a bar or restaurant." Dr. Richard Doll, the scientist who first linked active smoking to lung cancer, said in a 2001 radio interview, "The effects of other people smoking in my presence is so small it doesn't worry me."

These statements, among many others, are based on the results of studies that found no long-term health risks, and even on studies that claim to find risks, because the science is so weak.

Since smoking bans are premised on protecting nonsmokers, this nonsense to ban smoking should stop right here. It is not a public health issue. However, the anti-smoking crusaders cloud the issue by also dragging in misapplied majority opinion. It's constitutionally unethical for the majority to tyrannize the minority.

But more importantly, polling the public to determine a private establishment owner's fate is indecent. No customer or employee — each free to be there or not — should be able to dictate the house's rules. And for the "my way or the highway" anti-smokers who don't get it, we mean smokers shouldn't either. Only one person's vote counts — the owner's.

The case that workers shouldn't have to leave an environment they don't like or hours that fit their personal needs is nothing more than emotional blackmail. Slavery ended a long time ago. No one is forced to do anything they don't like.

For the lawmakers who believe economics is the determining factor, New York City's sales tax revenue for bars and restaurants did not rise 8.7 percent, as claimed by agencies Bloomberg dispatched on the one-year anniversary (March 2004) of the city's ban. Not only were the figures distorted by including places like McDonald's and Starbucks as restaurants, but smoking was banned in 95 percent of restaurants since the 1995 smoking ban law. What pre- to post-ban restaurant tax revenue comparison was there to make? In all cases (notably bars), it's a no-brainer that sales tax revenue was artificially low immediately following 9/11. To compare the post-ban year to those figures is dishonest.

In April, the New York State Department of Taxation released a much more official review of sales tax revenue. When one compares the pre-ban year to the post-ban year, bars in New York City lost more than 3.5 percent. Statewide, as confirmed by a report in the New York Post May 2, sales tax revenue "dropped or remained relatively flat since the smoking ban went into effect July 2003."

Junk science, tyranny and cooked books is pitting neighbor against neighbor and has ruined or will ruin individual livelihoods. Unbelievable. Don't do it, New Jersey.

A note of disclosure: Our organization has no ties to the tobacco industry nor do we speak on the behalf of the hospitality industry.

Audrey Silk

FOUNDER
NYC CITIZENS LOBBYING
AGAINST SMOKER HARASSMENT
BROOKLYN

20 posted on 08/01/2006 4:58:08 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
I am not saying they should ban it, but either sh*t or get off the pot. It is a legal substance, period, case closed.

Amen!

21 posted on 08/01/2006 4:59:14 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Has smoking ever been put on a death certificate as the cause of death?

Read my post #16

22 posted on 08/01/2006 5:00:28 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Scaremongering and masturbation.


23 posted on 08/01/2006 5:01:25 AM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

The one thing that galls me about the Surgeon General post is they allow these idiots to wear an Admirals uniform. These people have never been in the navy, yet they not only get to wear that uniform but they have all those ribbons. What the hell are those ribbons for if they never served!?


24 posted on 08/01/2006 5:01:29 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
In other words, he served his ceremonial political post and went away, having accomplished basically nothing. He got a very big soapbox from which to pursue his obsession against smokers and then he left. Good riddance. But it is funny to see his name mentioned alongside someone like Jocelyn Elders. Remember her, the Surgeon General who wanted to teach grade school children how to masturbate?
 
And people still respect that office. Go figure.

I just received the above in email.  Truer words were never spoken!  Thanks Dan!


25 posted on 08/01/2006 5:02:32 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
It may be politically correct to attack secondhand smoke, but it is not scientifically correct nor, in the Court’s opinion, legally correct.

Federal Court  Ruling on the Tobacco Industry's EPA Lawsuit: Summary and Practical Implications

In 1998 the link made by the EPA Report in 1993 between secondary smoke and cancer was thrown out in a federal court because the statistics were bent to support a predetermined conclusion and normal scientific guidelines were ignored.

26 posted on 08/01/2006 5:05:39 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
It may be politically correct to attack secondhand smoke, but it is not scientifically correct nor, in the Court’s opinion, legally correct.

Federal Court  Ruling on the Tobacco Industry's EPA Lawsuit: Summary and Practical Implications

In 1998 the link made by the EPA Report in 1993 between secondary smoke and cancer was thrown out in a federal court because the statistics were bent to support a predetermined conclusion and normal scientific guidelines were ignored.

27 posted on 08/01/2006 5:07:11 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
And no one can ever produce a death certificate that second hand smoke ever killed ANYONE!

Thanks for proving my point. Direct smoke and second hand smoke, according to you, have never been listed as a cause of death. Yet, even you agree that it is not healthy: "None of us advocates smoking as a healthy choice in life..."

Also, note that since it has not been listed as a cause of death it has never been ruled out either.

Smoking is a horrible thing to do to your body and if you are exposing children and others to it you are harming your fellow beings. Like it or not.

28 posted on 08/01/2006 5:09:10 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Most SGs want to leave a legacy of scaremongering. Otherwise, the nanny state would be no more.

And most of these idiots aren't even DOCTOR'S!!!!! 

But it is funny to see his name mentioned alongside someone like Jocelyn Elders. Remember her, the Surgeon General who wanted to teach grade school children how to masturbate?
 
And people still respect that office. Go figure.

29 posted on 08/01/2006 5:09:29 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
The one thing that galls me about the Surgeon General post is they allow these idiots to wear an Admirals uniform. These people have never been in the navy, yet they not only get to wear that uniform but they have all those ribbons. What the hell are those ribbons for if they never served!?

Like I said: most of them aren't even DOCTOR'S!!!!! 

30 posted on 08/01/2006 5:10:41 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I hate smoking. I wish the government would stop protecting the tobacco industry and let the lawyers pick the corpse clean. But I can't stand lies.

And this nonsense on second hand smoke is nothing but a pack of lies. And stupid, obvious lies at that.

There is more than enough real data on smoking, there is no need to make more up.


31 posted on 08/01/2006 5:15:04 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up two (2) seats in the Senate and four (4) seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Smoking is a horrible thing to do to your body and if you are exposing children and others to it you are harming your fellow beings. Like it or not.

Listen, I certainly do not have to explain anything to you, but most of us in here grew up in smoking households.

And many of us married and have children, who also grew up into smoking households.  Most of our kids are strong, young adults today with babes of their own. 

If you want to buy into the anti crap about second hand smoke hurting and killing everyone, that's your prerogative.  But it's all lies, like it or not. 

You just want to believe this crap because you hate smokers, you hate smoking and like some of your ilk YOU CAN'T STAND THE SMELL.

Well, "I" can't stand the smell of an unwashed body and a dirty mouth either.  Personal hygiene has a lot do do with smells, and a good bar of soap and water and toothpaste and shampoo go along way. 

I have hung with smokers since I was born.  I started smoking at age 16, (peer pressure), and I hung with smokers for many years.  It hasn't hurt ME or any of my family or friends.  Don't even try to explain it to me, because you and I will never agree when it comes to the smoking issue.

"Smoking is a horrible thing to do to your body?" heh! What about alcoholism?  Meth and drug use?  Over eating? The list goes on and on and on.  But all you can concentrate on is smoking.  Pity.

32 posted on 08/01/2006 5:17:58 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I hope it wasn't something I said.....

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2006/07/i-hope-it-wasnt-something-i-said.html


33 posted on 08/01/2006 5:21:46 AM PDT by mwernimont (The facts on secondhand smoke don't support the smoking ban agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

Vice Admiral Richard H. Carmona was sworn in as the 17th Surgeon General of the United States Public Health Service on August 5, 2002.

Born and raised in New York City, Dr. Carmona dropped out of high school and enlisted in the U.S. Army in 1967. While enlisted he received his Army General Equivalency Diploma, joined the Army's Special Forces, ultimately becoming a combat-decorated Vietnam veteran, and began his career in medicine.


34 posted on 08/01/2006 5:25:55 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Dr. Carmona has worked in various positions in the medical field including paramedic, registered nurse and physician. Dr. Carmona completed a surgical residency at the University of California, San Francisco, and a National Institutes of Health-sponsored fellowship in trauma, burns and critical care. Dr. Carmona is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons, and is also certified in correctional health care and in quality assurance.


35 posted on 08/01/2006 5:27:33 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Raycpa
You see. Raycpa is right. Your vehemence and lack of ability to have a rational discussion makes you your own worst enemy.

And many of us married and have children, who also grew up into smoking households. Most of our kids are strong, young adults today with babes of their own.

I grew up in a smoking household. My parents still smoke. So what? I still think smoking is a horrible thing.

If you want to buy into the anti crap about second hand smoke hurting and killing everyone, that's your prerogative. But it's all lies, like it or not.

You can't prove that. Don't post your one or two links. Not enough research has been done by objective sources.

I have hung with smokers since I was born. I started smoking at age 16, (peer pressure), and I hung with smokers for many years. It hasn't hurt ME or any of my family or friends. Don't even try to explain it to me, because you and I will never agree when it comes to the smoking issue.

Sure it's harmed you. Look at your posts. Your anger is overwhelming towards people like me. It's alienated you to posting to your choir.

"Smoking is a horrible thing to do to your body?" heh! What about alcoholism? Meth and drug use? Over eating? The list goes on and on and on. But all you can concentrate on is smoking. Pity.

God, how wrong can one person be. I have spent years helping alcoholics. Do you know my thoughts, deeds and words?

Your inability to see past the glowing end of your cigarette has turned you into a most unpleasant poster.

Good day.

36 posted on 08/01/2006 5:46:20 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

What a nutcase! The thread is about smoking, so why should someone be forced to list other harmful activities. Do you understand that lung cancer risk is an order of magnitude higher for smokers than non-smokers?

And, yes, I hate the smell. And you have certainly been harmed by smoking, as have your family members. Pity, indeed.

Your self-concious, hyperbolic responses might indicate that you are aware of the truth at some level, but resistant to it. Happy puffing.


37 posted on 08/01/2006 5:53:40 AM PDT by usafsk ((Know what you're talking about before you dance the QWERTY waltz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Are you going to condemn the findings of the American Cancer Society?

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2004/04/american-cancer-society-test-results.html

It's their air quality test results after all.


38 posted on 08/01/2006 5:58:19 AM PDT by mwernimont (The facts on secondhand smoke don't support the smoking ban agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
None of us advocates smoking as a healthy choice in life, but there are a lot worse things adults can do with themselves.

Heroin, crack cocaine, and russian roullette. Otherwise, no, there aren't. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.

39 posted on 08/01/2006 6:00:39 AM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: usafsk
Do you understand that lung cancer risk is an order of magnitude higher for smokers than non-smokers

Do you understand that the chances of getting into a fatal car accident are much higher if you drive then if you walk?

Life is full of risks. Adults need to constantly make informed choices evaluating risks and rewards. No one's assessment is the same as to which risks are worth the rewards.

Not to speak for SheLion, but she has admitted that smoking is a risky activity. But so is driving, drinking, hangliding, and all sorts of legal activities that adults engage in.

What smokers need is better information on the risks with which to base their decisions. When people like the SG make assertions based on dubious science, and anti-smoking nazis in government jump on the same "science" to pass ever more restrictive laws - now affecting private property rights, then how much credence do you think smokers are going to give to all the previous data? It throws it all into question.
40 posted on 08/01/2006 6:03:08 AM PDT by CertainInalienableRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mwernimont
Are you going to condemn the findings of the American Cancer Society?

Huh???? This backs me up.

41 posted on 08/01/2006 6:04:10 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Okay, here is the rest of the story -

After leaving active duty, Dr. Carmona attended Bronx Community College, of the City University of New York, where he earned his associate of arts degree. He later attended and graduated from the University of California, San Francisco, with a bachelor of science degree (1977) and medical degree (1979). At the University of California Medical School, Dr. Carmona was awarded the prestigious gold headed cane as the top graduate. He has also earned a masters of public health from the University of Arizona (1998).

Dr. Carmona has worked in various positions in the medical field including paramedic, registered nurse and physician. Dr. Carmona completed a surgical residency at the University of California, San Francisco, and a National Institutes of Health-sponsored fellowship in trauma, burns and critical care. Dr. Carmona is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons, and is also certified in correctional health care and in quality assurance.

Prior to being named Surgeon General, Dr. Carmona was the chairman of the State of Arizona Southern Regional Emergency Medical System, a professor of surgery, public health and family and community medicine at the University of Arizona, and the Pima County Sheriff's Department surgeon and deputy sheriff.

Dr. Carmona has also held progressive positions of responsibility as chief medical officer, hospital chief executive officer, public health officer, and finally chief executive officer of the Pima county health care system. He has also served as a medical director of police and fire departments and is a fully-qualified peace officer with expertise in special operations and emergency preparedness, including weapons of mass destruction.

Dr. Carmona has published extensively and received numerous awards, decorations, and local and national recognition for his achievements. A strong supporter of community service, he has served on community and national boards and provided leadership to many diverse organizations.

First off, his bio never states he became an officer. Enlisted SpecOps. Second, he left active duty in the early 70's. I guess I should have been more specific. He never served in the Navy! Why do they wear the Admirals uniform? His few years in the Army did not give him all those ribbons. Where do they come from and why is he allowed to wear them?

42 posted on 08/01/2006 6:06:08 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

And once again, Ray, your agenda is showing.


43 posted on 08/01/2006 6:06:14 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: usafsk; SheLion

Lung cancer is just the tip of the iceberg. Smoking dramatically increases risks for a great many kinds of cancer, including breast, prostate and colon, dramatically increases the risks of heart disease, dramatically increases the risks of diabetes and stroke, etc. These aren't tenuous or hypothetical links, these are huge, clinically proven, scientifically inarguable risk factors that dwarf just about everything else that you can do to yourself to get you sick.


44 posted on 08/01/2006 6:06:53 AM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe


Posters created by the Surgeon General that is the subject of this thread are not relevant?


45 posted on 08/01/2006 6:09:52 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

No, it doesn't back you up at all. It proves the hype about secondhand smoke is just that......exaggerated hype, financed by pharmaceutical nicotine interests.

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2006/01/will-there-be-investigation-into-this.html


46 posted on 08/01/2006 6:10:39 AM PDT by mwernimont (The facts on secondhand smoke don't support the smoking ban agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mwernimont

Did you read this post ray the ACS test results PROVE secondhand smoke is 25,000 times SAFER than OSHA regulations for secondhand smoke.

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2004/04/american-cancer-society-test-results.html

SAFER.....so where's the health hazard?


47 posted on 08/01/2006 6:14:14 AM PDT by mwernimont (The facts on secondhand smoke don't support the smoking ban agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mwernimont

Do you know how to read a chart?


48 posted on 08/01/2006 6:14:26 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mwernimont
I hope it wasn't something I said.....

Great Blog there!  And you are just saying what the rest of us are saying!  If the truth hurts the anti's, so be it.  I'm tired of them trying to pull the wool over the general non-smoking public.  We have enough to worry about in this day and age without having to defend wisps of smoke. heh!

Thanks for your link.  I really enjoyed seeing it!

49 posted on 08/01/2006 6:17:38 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

And what is the PEL for Nicotine Particulates?


50 posted on 08/01/2006 6:20:59 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-281 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson