Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BP shutting down large Alaska oil field
ap ^ | 8/6/06

Posted on 08/06/2006 6:14:03 PM PDT by mathprof

BP Exploration Alaska, Inc. began shutting down the Prudhoe Bay oil field Sunday after discovering unexpectedly severe corrosion and a small spill from a transit pipeline. ADVERTISEMENT

Prudhoe Bay represents about half of Alaska's oil production and about 8 percent of U.S. production, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Company officials said it would take days to shut down the oil field. Once completed, it's expected to reduce oil field production by 400,000 barrels a day.

"We regret that it is necessary to take this action and we apologize to the nation and the State of Alaska for the adverse impacts it will cause," BP America Chairman and President Bob Malone said in a prepared statement.

Officials learned Friday that data from an internal sensing device found 16 anomalies in 12 locations in an oil transit line on the eastern side of the field. Follow-up inspections found "corrosion-related wall thinning appeared to exceed BP criteria for continued operation," the company said in a release.

That's when workers also found a small spill, estimated to be about 4 to 5 barrels.

BP says the spill has been contained and clean up efforts are under way.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: anwr; bigoil; bp; energy; gasprices
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-197 next last
I hate those BP commercials.

 

AP Photo: Two caribou pause as they walk down a road at the Prudhoe Bay oil field...
 

1 posted on 08/06/2006 6:14:04 PM PDT by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Gas up. Here comes a 20 cent run up in gas prices. This is what happens when we have such tight domestic supply with Dems. standing in the way of getting more. Any small shut down of production will mean we all get screwed. Thanks once again to the Party of Evil and the RINOs who join with them to keep us all with tighter budgets thanks to gas prices


2 posted on 08/06/2006 6:17:14 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Just how many rich liberals also own oil stocks?I notice their politics doesn't usually stop the annoited from profiting at the expense of the masses.


3 posted on 08/06/2006 6:19:55 PM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Black oil aliens eating the pipes?


4 posted on 08/06/2006 6:20:31 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

400,000 barrels is about 4% (IIRC) of the US domestic supply.

So a 4% decrease will equal a 20% increase.

Gas is $3.38/Gallon now (In SoCal), so it should be ap to $4.05 in a week.

Yippee.


5 posted on 08/06/2006 6:21:34 PM PDT by Nice50BMG (3 books to read this year: The Bible (God), Bringing Up Boys (Dobson), Winning the Future (Newt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham
Just how many rich liberals also own oil stocks?

It's easy to find out :)

Just go to....

www.opensecrets.org

...and look up their financials.

The hypocrites among them do indeed own Big Oil.

6 posted on 08/06/2006 6:23:19 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

The link above is for checking out rich, liberal Congress critters and Senators :)


7 posted on 08/06/2006 6:24:28 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

For how long???????????????????????????????????????????????


8 posted on 08/06/2006 6:24:44 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Remember BP profits when oil prices go up too. Notice they gave no estimate as to when it might be back in production.


9 posted on 08/06/2006 6:24:56 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (I'll have the duck with mango salsa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

"oh crap" ping

I've enjoyed a nice three day weekend. I just learned I'm going to have a crappy Monday by reading this thread. Most likely, I'll have 5 or 6 Mondays this week.


10 posted on 08/06/2006 6:26:22 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

I do too, and as an BP shareholder it makes my blood boil that they are wasting money on such garbage.


11 posted on 08/06/2006 6:26:35 PM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Soon be autumn....and cold...so what happens to the entire pipeline if it's shut down in winter....?

Seems to me major problems ahead.

12 posted on 08/06/2006 6:27:58 PM PDT by spokeshave (The Democrat Party stands for open treason in a time of war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

open the SPR to make up for it, otherwise oil will spike over $80 because of this.

fine the company, don't they do preventative maintenance on these pipelines? they are rolling in profits.


13 posted on 08/06/2006 6:28:27 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Gee. Wasn't it an explosion at a BP refinery in Texas that sent gas prices rocketing upward a month or so before Katrina hit?


14 posted on 08/06/2006 6:30:11 PM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

they basically used the pipelines without maintenance, until it corroded all the way through. that's what I read here.

this is why all this stuff about how "the oil companies will plow their profits into R&D and new supplies and new refineries" - is BS, here they don't even use it to maintain the infrastructure they have.

this single action may well cost the republicans any chance in 2006 for the Congress - if it takes gas to $4 through November.


15 posted on 08/06/2006 6:32:09 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

it will be back in operation only after they milk profits from the coming price increase.

fine them 100 million per day until its back in service, that will light a fire under their a*s.


16 posted on 08/06/2006 6:34:09 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

the mullahs are laughing their a*sses off in Tehran tonight.


17 posted on 08/06/2006 6:34:55 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

This is a maintenance item....pipes corrude,...they monitor them and they found they need to do some maintenance....

Jeez!


18 posted on 08/06/2006 6:36:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Explains the Friday price bump in St. Louis. Most stations were selling regular at 2.84-2.89, while almost all BP stations went to 3.19 on Friday. Local talk radio had several "experts" on who had no explainations for the price increase. Supposedly, average prices have come down due to competition today, but I need to fill up tomorrow morning--we'll see.


19 posted on 08/06/2006 6:38:07 PM PDT by bnev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp; ChiMark; Amerigomag; ElkGroveDan; Boot Hill; Czar; kellynla; Dog Gone; ...

gasoline alert!


20 posted on 08/06/2006 6:39:00 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

"fine the company, don't they do preventative maintenance on these pipelines? they are rolling in profits."

They will be severely punished because of the oil spill, even though it is only a small amount.

You don't seem to understand, what BP is saying is that the time, expense and effort to get permission to replace this pipeline isn't worth it, even if it does shut down oil production.

These guys don't want to NOT pump oil out of the ground, it's the government that is making this impossible.


21 posted on 08/06/2006 6:39:27 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Exactly. This is what's going to happen alright. Don't forget the Dems and Envirowackos are the reasons we don't have more refineries to begin with, which would keep the necessary supply required to meet the demand. Years ago, many of the companies, BP included, chose NOT to invest in building more refineries because it was so cost-prohibitive due to all the regs put into place. I understand we need regs, but the regs the wackos want are insipid and ludicrous.


22 posted on 08/06/2006 6:40:22 PM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Remember BP profits when oil prices go up too.

Only if they have actual product to sell. Other oil companies are probably glad this happened, but I doubt BP is.

23 posted on 08/06/2006 6:40:26 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I think something fundamentally wrong about this story. They cannot indefinitely shut oil production.
24 posted on 08/06/2006 6:40:45 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Remember BP profits when oil prices go up too. Notice they gave no estimate as to when it might be back in production.

Maybe they need to assess the situation before making any firm predictions. BP is hardly profiting by shutting in their own production. Other oil companies who will continue to deliver oil will benefit perhaps, but not BP.

25 posted on 08/06/2006 6:41:42 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

The hurricaine season ain't panning out, nature ain't cooperating - oceans too cold. Someone had to step-in and do something. Only two years left - make $$ while big oil shines !


26 posted on 08/06/2006 6:43:01 PM PDT by AncientAirs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

"it will be back in operation only after they milk profits from the coming price increase"

No. It will be back in operation after the state of Alaska, and all the Native corporations realize they will get less royalty money and will have to tighten their belts.

They will make sure the ridiculous environmental requirements for building and maintaining oil production infrastructure on the north slope are relaxed, and fast.


27 posted on 08/06/2006 6:43:41 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

what you say may well be generally true.

But I don't see anything here that tells me that state regulators shut down the pipeline based on some specious environmental regulation - the company determined it was structurally unsound (corroded), and leaking. how they let it get that far is the issue.


28 posted on 08/06/2006 6:47:25 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

The headline is misleading!


29 posted on 08/06/2006 6:47:35 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AncientAirs

"Only two years left - make $$ while big oil shines !"

Only two years left? You know something the rest of us dont?


30 posted on 08/06/2006 6:47:59 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

the key word is PREVENTATIVE maintenance. anyone can do maintenance when the thing goes to hell.

I change my car's oil every 5K miles, I don't wait for my engine to seize.


31 posted on 08/06/2006 6:48:28 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

"they need to do some maintenance"

You can't just "do some maintenance" on the north slope. they have an onerous permitting process. They've said that the risk of continued operation exceeds the potential profit of the oil in the ground at that field.

Reduce the cost of the risk, and they will reconsider.


32 posted on 08/06/2006 6:48:54 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
Only if they have actual product to sell.

So Prudhoe Bay is the only place BP drills for oil?

33 posted on 08/06/2006 6:50:19 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (I'll have the duck with mango salsa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Pray tell, how does one do maintenance on an old pipeline?

It lasts until it wears out.


34 posted on 08/06/2006 6:50:44 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

huh? oil is $75/bbl, and the company is saying it doesn't pay to do maintenance on the pipeline.

where are you reading in this article that government regulation is preventing maintenace related repairs/replacement?


35 posted on 08/06/2006 6:50:50 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

"internal sensing device found 16 anomalies in 12 locations in an oil transit line on the eastern side of the field."


12 separate locations with wall thinning isn't exactly 'routine maintenance'


36 posted on 08/06/2006 6:51:06 PM PDT by RFC_Gal (It's not just a boulder; It's a rock! A ro-o-ock. The pioneers used to ride these babies for miles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Doesn't BP stand for British Petroleum?
37 posted on 08/06/2006 6:51:09 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

just when the price had finally gotten down below three bucks!

well, I had fully expected to pay 5 bucks a gallon this summer anyway.

guess I better go fill up all the vehicles tonight!


38 posted on 08/06/2006 6:51:30 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

you build an alternate one right along side of it, with a diverting valve at the pumping stations.


39 posted on 08/06/2006 6:52:01 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
how they let it get that far is the issue.

What should they do that they did not do?

40 posted on 08/06/2006 6:52:42 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
My husband and I recently took a tour of the Prudhoe Bay Oilfields.....it's a huge operation. This is not good! There are so many environmental restrictions it's unbelievable....didn't see any caribou but plenty of musk ox. This area is not for the feint of heart!
41 posted on 08/06/2006 6:53:13 PM PDT by mtnwmn (mtnwmn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

The old "fix it when it breaks" preventive maintenance plan.


42 posted on 08/06/2006 6:54:08 PM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
fine the company, don't they do preventative maintenance on these pipelines? they are rolling in profits.

WHAT? This IS preventative maintenance. A 5 bbl spill, and weak spots in the pipeline discovered, requiring a shutdown to replace the corroded sections of the line.

Rolling in profits?? They have shut down 400,000 bbl/day of production. They will have to replace the corroded sections of pipeline. I am not sure how the extra expenses and (at only $60/bbl) $24 million A DAY LESS revenue is going to keep them "rolling in profits", maybe you can explain this accounting system to me???

They should fined for this??? I suppose they could just keep going until the pipeline ruptures and they spill a couple hundred thousand barrels of oil instead of a couple hundred gallons. Then it would not only have to be fixed, but there would be a real mess to clean up instead of a couple of bathtubs full.

43 posted on 08/06/2006 6:54:08 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

" how they let it get that far is the issue."

One can presume they took all the normal precautions. This sounds like the pipeline needs replacement - and it's not cost effective to do so. It's the same story over and over......environmental regs make US production non-viable


44 posted on 08/06/2006 6:54:23 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

how do power companies perform maintenance on electrical infrastructure, without causing blackouts? don't you think that telephone companies replace cabling and equipment, without taking your phone down?


45 posted on 08/06/2006 6:54:26 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

That's not maintenance. That's replacement. Do you keep a spare transmission hooked up to your engine as part of your routine maintenance?


46 posted on 08/06/2006 6:55:23 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

"you build an alternate one right along side of it, with a diverting valve at the pumping stations."

Sure sounds simple. Ok, get back to me when you have the environmental impact report completed, and don't even think about touching a square inch of permafrost until then. See ya in 3 years.


47 posted on 08/06/2006 6:56:46 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

You are equating transmission wires with a pipeline?


48 posted on 08/06/2006 6:57:02 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

build pipeline sections next to the ones requiring maintenance, divert the flow, and replace the aging sections.

now what are they going to do? the flow will be stopped totally, they have no other means of flowing it, and they have to go in there on an emergency basis and replace it. and who knows how many sections they are going to find like this.


49 posted on 08/06/2006 6:57:18 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

ROFL!


50 posted on 08/06/2006 6:59:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson