Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: China has deployed missiles giving it second-strike capability against U.S.
Insight Magazine ^ | 8/7/2006 | Staff

Posted on 08/07/2006 11:49:46 AM PDT by Paul Ross

Report: China has deployed missiles giving it second-strike capability against U.S.
Insight Magazine, August 3, 2006

The U.S. intelligence community has determined that Beijing has developed and deployed a series of missiles that would give China second-strike nuclear capability in any confrontation with the United States. The determination of a sea-based deterrent is said to have significantly increased Beijing's threat to the United States.

"It is clear to me that China is now embarking on a significant investment in a second-strike capability to ensure the survival and, thus, viability of its nuclear forces," said Richard Fisher, a researcher at the International Assessment and Strategy Center and a leading U.S. expert on China.

In a presentation to the American Enterprise Institute on July 11, Mr. Fisher said China has launched or tested a series of nuclear missiles and platforms.

He said the first Type 94 submarine ballistic nuclear missile has been equipped and launched.

The Type 94, which began construction in 1999, is designed to contain the JL-2 submarine-launched nuclear missiles. Each submarine is meant to contain 16 JL-2s, or DF-31s, with a range of 8,000 kilometers, which would allow Chinese submarines to target portions of the United States from areas near the Chinese coast.

The disclosure of the completion of the Type 94 submarine appeared to mark a significant acceleration in China's nuclear submarine program. As late as May 2004, the Pentagon asserted that the new Chinese missile submarine would not be operational until around 2010.

"The JL-2 SLBM has undergone a series of tests," Mr. Fisher said. "The potential for this to be armed with multiple warheads is there."

U.S. intelligence sources agree with Mr. Fisher's assessment. They said Beijing has made the production of nuclear warheads and launchers a priority, with emphasis on mobility and decoys.

The Pentagon has determined that China plans to deploy the DF-31A, an extended-range variant of the mobile long-range DF-31, in 2007. The sources said the new three-stage, solid-fuel, mobile missile, with a range of 12,000 kilometers, could carry up to three payloads that would separate and overcome existing U.S. missile defenses.

"For China, nuclear weapons largely have four purposes: one, strategic deterrence; two, retaliation; three, counter-coercion; and four, great-power status," Rand Corp. senior analyst Evan Medeiros said.

Another Chinese missile, the DF-5 Mod 2, with a range of 13,000 kilometers, is said to have completed deployment in 2005. The sources said China has developed the two-stage, liquid-fuel missile to carry between five and 10 warheads.

Beijing has also sought to overcome the vulnerability of its fleet by building a huge naval base on Hainan Island in the South China Sea. The sources said the base would contain an underground facility to shelter platforms, such as nuclear submarines, against any potential U.S. attack.

Intelligence sources said Beijing has been developing an anti-ship ballistic missile. They said the weapon could be a sea-based version of the DF-11 Mod 1 land-based missile.

"One could easily imagine that there is a plan to drop, in a surprise manner, 10 to 12 warheads on either side of the continental United States in conjunction with a build-up to rescue Taiwan from whatever kind of attack China seems to be contemplating," Mr. Fisher said. "I can easily imagine, I do not know, President Hillary Clinton sitting in the White House wondering, 'Gee, we could not do anything to stop those 12 warheads that did not explode but landed off of all our major cities on both coasts.' And do we really want to be sending our single carrier that might be deployed with the Seventh Fleet into this maelstrom? That is the kind of coercion potential that is out there."



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; Japan; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Russia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; beijing; chicomm; china; chinathreat; chinesemilitary; clintonlegacy; df31; geopolitics; jl2; navy; pla; plan; prc; slbm; taiwan; type094
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
JL-2 SLBM Missile Details here.

Increasing our need for Missile defense still more.


1 posted on 08/07/2006 11:49:52 AM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

We are just a frog in a frying pan, while China, North Korea, and Iran is manning the skillet.


2 posted on 08/07/2006 11:51:58 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

"For China, nuclear weapons largely have four purposes: one, strategic deterrence; two, retaliation; three, counter-coercion; and four, great-power status,"

It seems to me, second strike missles are a good thing.


3 posted on 08/07/2006 11:52:18 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Thanks to Bill Clinton.




Say, whatever happened to that "Chinagate" investigation anyway? Of that's right.... There wasn't any.


4 posted on 08/07/2006 11:52:32 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD; Alamo-Girl; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; ALOHA RONNIE; maui_hawaii; JohnHuang2; ...
Ping.

Underestimation by Panda Huggers politically appointed in DOD...of Chinese nuclear threat capability confirmed yet again.

5 posted on 08/07/2006 11:53:14 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

And we're paying for the propane.


6 posted on 08/07/2006 11:53:42 AM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Perhaps of interest.
7 posted on 08/07/2006 11:53:43 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Why are these "second-strike" missiles unsuitable for a first strike?


8 posted on 08/07/2006 11:56:20 AM PDT by thoughtomator (The worst thing about censorship is XXXXXXXXXXXXX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

I don't believe this report. Everyone knows our trade with China has changed it forever. We're save now!


9 posted on 08/07/2006 11:56:44 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

We are not only paying for for it, we are making it. and shipping it back in american dollars by buying their qualit products to pay for their government to gain second strike capability. Everyone is to blame. The consumer, the new "general contractor" corporations we have now, the politicians, and general apathy. And I heard the General Apathy is getting a promotion.


10 posted on 08/07/2006 11:56:58 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross


Oh for Christ sake...1. H-Rod will never be POTUS. 2. If china ever launched a nuke strike against us...that would be the end of China...they're be a lot of Friy Wryce..to go around.

If they want to spend money to build missiles, let'em (china)...as long as we build up our defensive capabilities as well as retarget, and improve, our existing arsenal to deal with China. Last couple of articles I read on our (U.S.) Defensive/Strategic posture...we're doing exactly that.


11 posted on 08/07/2006 11:59:14 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; RightWhale; Tailgunner Joe
Everyone knows our trade with China has changed it forever.

But not in a good way. Still communist. But now they have our technology.

12 posted on 08/07/2006 11:59:24 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Why does China think we will attack them??


13 posted on 08/07/2006 11:59:45 AM PDT by Mo1 (Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Insight has only a slightly better track record than Debka.


14 posted on 08/07/2006 11:59:51 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (The Left hates America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

bttt


15 posted on 08/07/2006 12:00:06 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Second strike missles are better than "use them or lose them" first strike missles.

Of course they can be used as a first strike, but no one uses nukes if the other guy can hit you back. That means no one but the towel heads are going to nuke the US.


16 posted on 08/07/2006 12:00:44 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

After the first exchange, who really cares?


17 posted on 08/07/2006 12:00:48 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Agreed


18 posted on 08/07/2006 12:02:07 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

That's what they say:

"The capitalist will sell us the rope we will hang them with"


19 posted on 08/07/2006 12:02:08 PM PDT by observer5 (It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
We're save now!

All our bases are belong to the China people.

20 posted on 08/07/2006 12:03:16 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson