Posted on 08/09/2006 11:55:05 AM PDT by Uncledave
Lieberman and the War 08/09 11:31 AM The "experts," i.e., anyone on TV, tell us that the Lieberman-Lamont race was about one issue and one issue only — the war. Well, then, since 48 percent of the Democrats voted for Lieberman, I guess 48 percent support the war. The national Democrats better hope that's not the case — Connecticut being a blue state — or their dreams of electoral victory in November and beyond will be just that ... dreams.
Once again Mark Levine is trying to apply logic. Save your time Oh Great One the Moonbats don't recognize logic, reason or decency, only pure hate and anarchy.
Terrific piece by the great one, ping:)
McKinney had a local radio commercial here in GA that said that a vote for Cynthia was a vote against Bush and his administration.
She only got 41%.
Yes, Reid and Schroomface can get skewered by their own words -- they claim that the CT primary was a REFERENDUM on Pres. Bush.... well, well, even in liberal blue CT only 52% of 'Rats voted for the anti-war candidate. That would correspond with 20% or less nationwide, so the moonbat nutroot position is not exactly a winner nationally for 2006 and 2008, now is it?
They needed a blow-out to plausibly claim there is any great anti-war movement and they didn't get it.
Of course, since logic and facts don't matter to the MSM, the Demagogues, or the lib nutroots they will say anything they please about how this result shows the power of lefty blogs and anti-war sentiment, etc.
Of course they got it. It was a landslide 4% victory. 4% is a landslide mandate if you are a liberal democrat moonbat. It is not a mandate, however, if you are President Bush.
Great piece!
Thanks... will read later!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.