Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Reuters be investigated?
Politics Central ^ | August 10, 2006

Posted on 08/10/2006 1:05:04 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776

Blog investigation forced the vaunted British news agency to withdraw the Beirut photos of Adnan Hajj and fire the photographer. Is this just the tip of the iceberg? Should Reuters be investigated and, if so, by whom? PJM’s Roger Simon moderates this exclusive podcast discussion with Caroline Glick of the Jerusalem Post, Cliff May of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy and Thomas Lifson of The American Thinker.

(Excerpt) Read more at politicscentral.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alreuters; reuterrorism; reuters
Reuters Group plc (LSE: RTR and NASDAQ: RTRSY) is best known as a news service that provides reports from around the world to newspapers and broadcasters. However, news reporting accounts for less than 10% of the company's income. Its main focus is on supplying the financial markets with information and trading products. These include market data, such as share prices and currency rates, research and analytics, as well as trading systems that allow dealers to buy and sell such things as currencies and shares on a computer screen instead of by telephone or on a trading floor like that of the New York Stock Exchange. Competitors include Bloomberg L.P. and Dow Jones Newswires.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters

1 posted on 08/10/2006 1:05:05 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

I suggest CBS do the investigation. Oustanding fact checkers there I am told.


2 posted on 08/10/2006 1:06:10 PM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (Just another evil conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

If Reuters is best Known for it's news coverage, but that only accounts for 10 percent of their company's income.....Is it possible that Reuters is slanting their news to influence financial markets.


3 posted on 08/10/2006 1:06:31 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Reuters is relying on the "Trust Principles" , but the trust has been broken


4 posted on 08/10/2006 1:08:09 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Investigating them would put the media on notice, that it's actions were not going get the usual free pass any longer. It would allow the merits of the case against the MSM to be aired in public. That probably wouldn't be a bad thing.

It'll never happen. IMO


5 posted on 08/10/2006 1:08:24 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
I nominate Dan ( What's the frequency Kenneth? ) Rather to do the investigation......

Would be great fictional entertainment.

6 posted on 08/10/2006 1:09:14 PM PDT by Osage Orange (The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Investigated by WHOM?


7 posted on 08/10/2006 1:09:52 PM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

The Reuters Building

South Colonnade

Canary Wharf

London

E14 5EP

United Kingdom

Tel: + 44 (0)20 7250 1122


8 posted on 08/10/2006 1:09:55 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
Having no credibility may be worse than an investigation .
9 posted on 08/10/2006 1:09:56 PM PDT by lionheart 247365 (( I.S.L.A.M. stands for - Islams Spiritual Leaders Advocate Murder .. .. .. ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Public opinion is the moderating body in this case. If they lose trust they lose readers.


10 posted on 08/10/2006 1:10:13 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope

http://richmedia.pajamasmedia.com/audio/politicscentral/2006/08/20060808-PJM-RS-ReutersInvestigated.mp3


11 posted on 08/10/2006 1:11:03 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776; All
Great Flash Video: "Photo Fraud In Lebanon" ~ aish.com

12 posted on 08/10/2006 1:11:35 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Should Reuters be investigated? With all certainty. Just like with CBS, Reuters should be called on the carpet along with the islamic journalist and made to answer the lies Reuters is perpetrating upon the public consciousness.


13 posted on 08/10/2006 1:11:45 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ndt

They don't just lose readers , they loose financial clout and investors


14 posted on 08/10/2006 1:11:53 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Sort of reminds me of the story I read about the Battle of Waterloo. Seems that Napoleon was marching toward Waterloo, and the whole world was experiencing the jitters. The Rothschild family received a messenger pigeon from one of their operatives at the front. Napoleon had been defeated.

So the Rothschilds spread the news that Napoleon had been victorious. The stock market crashed. They bought up all the stocks at rock bottom prices.

Then a horse and rider arrived in London to reveal the truth, and the stock market soared.

They did not have the SEC in those days, so they got away with it.


15 posted on 08/10/2006 1:12:26 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Thank you for posting that, I saw it earlier, it is very damning to the coverage that Reuters is providing on the war in Lebanon.


16 posted on 08/10/2006 1:13:02 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I am thinking that Reuters is slanting the news , for Personal gain, influencing money markets.


17 posted on 08/10/2006 1:15:16 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

The Reuters Building in Canary Wharf


18 posted on 08/10/2006 1:16:42 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

The news organization has been accused of showing liberal bias, especially in its media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict, by sources such as the National Review and the Wall Street Journal's editorial division. Some allegations are based on Reuters own admissions of doctored photographs or unprofessional behavior. [4] Other accusations are prompted by the use of words such as "militants" or "guerrillas" instead of "terrorists" for groups that deliberately murder civilians in pursuit of political objectives. The September 20, 2004 edition of the The New York Times reported that Reuters Global Managing Editor, David A Schlesinger, objected to Canadian newspapers editing Reuters articles through inclusion of the word "terrorist," stating that "my goal is to protect our reporters and protect our editorial integrity." [5] Critics claim that Reuters' avoidance of these words is selective [6], reflecting a larger bias against the United States [7], Israel [8], Jews [9], or Western values in general [10].

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters


19 posted on 08/10/2006 1:18:15 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

I suppose that's possible. It would have to be shown to be the case. I suspect it's just drifting on a sea of moral equivelency. Like much of the world's leftists, it's staff hasn't a clue...

That isn't a valid excuse BTW.


20 posted on 08/10/2006 1:20:16 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Reuters Group plc (RTRSY)
Reuters Group PLC operates as an electronic publisher of news and financial data worldwide. The company’s Sales and Trading division focuses on salespeople and traders who deal in the fixed income, equities, commodities, and energy and related markets. It provides cross-asset class, cross-geography information, integrated analytics, and electronic trading capabilities; and electronic trading and order routing tools to enable customers to connect their systems to electronic markets. Reuters Group’s Research and Asset Management division supports portfolio managers, wealth managers, brokers, investment bankers, and research analysts who make financial decisions outside the sales and trading environment. It offers an integrated package of public and proprietary fundamental information about companies and economic data, as well as markets information, news, and other content; and information on various managed funds. The company’s Enterprise division provides solutions to the institution, including datafeeds, trading room systems, and risk management systems. It offers an enterprise with various applications, tools, and infrastructure components to manage financial content across the customer trading environment; datafeeds, which companies use to power systems, such as algorithmic trading and portfolio management, and reference data used for compliance and portfolio pricing purposes; and products to manage trading positions and credit extension, make trading decisions, and control risk. The company’s Media division offers newspapers and magazines, news and information Web sites, and TV channels with text and broadcast news, video, and photographic coverage; and business professionals and individual investors with news and financial data, enabling them to stay informed about world events and manage their financial portfolios. The company was founded in 1851 by Paul Julius Reuter and is headquartered in London


21 posted on 08/10/2006 1:23:11 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
Here's a more detailed collection of "Rooter it"--
( Note that we get honorable mention at the bottom...)

Here's our post on the Reuters Photoshop scandal:
Reuters Doctoring Photos from Beirut?

You know, reading some of these other links (thanks!), I have to admit, the best, most concise summary of the lying, including references to the photog in question might just be----this Reuters Site!

Here's where it started:


Over at LGF, Charles runs an explosive expose on al-Reuters doctoring photos from Beirut. The implications of such deceit are staggering. link: 816 comments |


Here's where it stand today:

The Larger Issue

Richard at EU Referendum has some very apt comments on the Reuters Photoshop Scandal, and the likelihood that photos of the aftermath of the Qana bombing were staged by Hizballah. I’ve tried to bring up this subject in every interview, because I agree with Richard that this practice is much more insidious than clumsy image editing.


A synopsis of better links:

Kudos to LGF for spotting the photoshopping. And to the Freepers who helped demonstrate the fakery. Ace o' Spades, Hot Air, and Left & Right get honorable mentions as well. JPod at the Corner also notes Charles' takedown of Reuters.


22 posted on 08/10/2006 1:24:01 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I am thinking like those on Politics Central, that this is just the tip of the iceberg. There is more fraud to be exposed at Reuters.


23 posted on 08/10/2006 1:25:20 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

It is not just about the photoshopped News pic that have been purged from Reuters, that Reuters is intentionally misrepresenting the facts for their own Greed and Profit.


24 posted on 08/10/2006 1:28:06 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Then perhaps it's a good thing to push an investigation. Open up the can of worms.

I would like the Justice Department to explain why what the press is doing is wrong.


25 posted on 08/10/2006 1:31:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

I don't think an investigation would accomplish much. What are they going to do, announce that Reuters is owned by the Arabs and is politically motivated in their reporting? We already know that and the people who don't probably don't want to hear it anyway.

What we need is for people to wake up and quit reading reuters and the news establishments that use them.


26 posted on 08/10/2006 1:32:58 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
It is not just about the photoshopped News pic that have been purged from Reuters, that Reuters is intentionally misrepresenting the facts for their own Greed and Profit.

I ran across a rather interesting theory as to why the media ( including Rooters ) is so uniformly hostile to Israel. I myself started noticing it after the 1973 war, but had no particular opinion about the "why" of it- just noted the bias.

The theory in a nutshell is that the media loved Israel as long as it was quasi-socialist, but as they became more capitalist in nature and economy, the media switched sides.

27 posted on 08/10/2006 1:35:04 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

if you look up headlines on Reuters as a business, it is not about their news dept:
Wed, Jul 26, 2006
• Reuters lifts dividend for first time in 5 years, raises target
at MarketWatch (Wed, Jul 26)
• Reuters Posts Better-Than-Expected Revenue
AP (Wed, Jul 26)
• Results for First Six Months of 2006 Reuters Group Earnings Release - Before Market Open
CCBN (Wed, Jul 26)
• Reuters to Distribute University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers on an Exclusive Basis
Business Wire (Wed, Jul 26)
• CORRECT: Reuters profit falls 26%; ups revenue view
at MarketWatch (Wed, Jul 26)
Fri, Jul 21, 2006
• Foolish Forecast: Reading Radyne
at Motley Fool (Fri, Jul 21)
• Reuters And CME Complete FXMarketSpace Joint Venture
Business Wire (Fri, Jul 21)
Mon, Jul 17, 2006
• Reuters and CME Announce Participants in FXMarketSpace Early Adopter Program
PR Newswire (Mon, Jul 17)
Mon, Jul 10, 2006
• Reuters and Emirates Bank Agree Trade and Risk Management Deal
Business Wire (Mon, Jul 10)
Mon, Jul 3, 2006
• Former Reuters Chief Exec Renfrew Dies
AP (Mon, Jul 3)
Wed, Jun 21, 2006
• Cold, Hard FactSet
Motley Fool (Wed, Jun 21)
Wed, Jun 14, 2006
• Thomson Financial to Buy AFX News
AP (Wed, Jun 14)
Mon, Jun 12, 2006
• Reuters and NASDAQ Announce Times Square Marketing Alliance
Business Wire (Mon, Jun 12)
• Reuters Acquires Application Networks
AP (Mon, Jun 12)
• Reuters Buys Application Networks to Accelerate Growth in Its Risk Management Business
Business Wire (Mon, Jun 12)
Wed, Jun 7, 2006
• Reuters Group PLC [RTRSY] to Ring the NASDAQ Stock Market Closing Bell on Thursday, June 8
PR Newswire (Wed, Jun 7)
Tue, Jun 6, 2006
• Clearstream Offers Reuters Kondor + Trade and Risk Management Suite for Hosted Rental
Business Wire (Tue, Jun 6)
Mon, Jun 5, 2006
• Standard Bank Goes Live with Reuters Electronic Trading Technology
Business Wire (Mon, Jun 5)
Tue, May 23, 2006
• New Major FX Banks Join Reuters Trading for Foreign Exchange
Business Wire (Tue, May 23)
Mon, May 22, 2006
• Reuters Unveils New Version of Kondor+ for Global Trading Round the Clock
Business Wire (Mon, May 22)
• Reuters Trading for Fixed Income to Go Live in Brazil
Business Wire (Mon, May 22)
Mon, May 15, 2006
• Reuters Launches Reuters Tick Capture Engine in Asia for Trading Analytics
Business Wire (Mon, May 15)
Thu, May 4, 2006
• Reuters, CME in Forex Venture
at TheStreet.com (Thu, May 4)


28 posted on 08/10/2006 1:44:57 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Every single crew and reporter in Lebanon from every foreign source was under the direct control of Hez-Ebola and weere probably threatened to show only their side.


29 posted on 08/10/2006 1:45:15 PM PDT by GeronL (http://www.mises.org/story/1975 <--no such thing as a fairtax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Exactly....exactly.....I bet there are lots of Rothschild types at Reuters.


30 posted on 08/10/2006 1:46:55 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

I think Reuters under UN resolution 1559 was supposed to disband.


31 posted on 08/10/2006 1:47:55 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Maybe the Reuters Group doesn't need the 62 million of us who are conservatives to trust them...


32 posted on 08/10/2006 1:48:13 PM PDT by GOPJ (Al Gore - the original "Millions Could Die" kind of guy....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

I'm sure they don't. But I would like to think that the other citizens would see this issue raised high enough, with supporting evidence, to at least allow them to think about it.


33 posted on 08/10/2006 1:49:28 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Interestingly, I just did a websearch and discovered that the Rothschilds purchased Reuters back in the 1800's because they did not like the media coverage they were getting. Don't know how much of it they still own.


34 posted on 08/10/2006 1:53:48 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
Is it possible that Reuters is slanting their news to influence financial markets.

Nah. I remember when Rush Limbaugh was having his drug issues. The problem with the little blue
pills. I mean the little blue oxycontin pills. CBS Market Watch did a hit piece on Limbaugh, trying to drive
advertisers away from Rush towards Bill O'Reilly's new radio show, on the CBS radio syndicator Westwood One.

Oh, and the CBS Market Watch failed to mention the connection between fellow subsidiaries.

So, no, I don't think there's a connection... ./s

35 posted on 08/10/2006 1:53:51 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

News Story

Text Size: A A ANews Agencies Stand By Veracity Of Lebanon Bombing Photos
5:10 PM EDT August 1, 2006

NEW YORK (AP)--Three news agencies Tuesday rejected challenges to the veracity of photographs of bodies taken in the aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Lebanon, strongly denying that the images were staged.
Photographers from The Associated Press, Reuters and Agence France-Presse all covered rescue operations Sunday in Qana, where 56 Lebanese were killed. Many of their photos depicted rescue workers carrying dead children.
A U.K. Web site, the E.U. Referendum blog, built an argument that chicanery may have been involved by citing time stamps that went with captions of the photographs.
For example, the Web site draws attention to a photo by AP's Lefteris Pitarakis time-stamped 7:21 a.m., showing a dead girl in an ambulance. Another picture, stamped 10:25 a.m. and taken by AP's Mohammed Zaatari, shows the same girl being loaded onto the ambulance. In a third, by AP photographer Nasser Nasser and stamped 10:44 a.m., a rescue worker carries the girl with no ambulance nearby.
The site suggests these events were staged for effect, a criticism echoed by conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh when he directed listeners to the blog Monday.
"These photographers are obviously willing to participate in propaganda," Limbaugh said. "They know exactly what's being done, all these photos, bringing the bodies out of the rubble, posing them for the cameras, it's all staged. Every bit of it is staged and the still photographers know it."
The AP said information from its photo editors showed the events weren't staged, and that the time-stamps could be misleading for several reasons, including that Web sites can use such stamps to show when pictures are posted, not taken. An AFP executive said he was stunned to be questioned about it. Reuters, in a statement, said it categorically rejects any such suggestion.
"It's hard to imagine how someone sitting in an air-conditioned office or broadcast studio many thousands of miles from the scene can decide what occurred on the ground with any degree of accuracy," said Kathleen Carroll, AP's senior vice president and executive editor.
Carroll said in addition to personally speaking with photo editors, "I also know from 30 years of experience in this business that you can't get competitive journalists to participate in the kind of (staging) experience that is being described."
Photographers are experienced in recognizing when someone is trying to stage something for their benefit, she said.
"Do you really think these people would risk their lives under Israeli shelling to set up a digging ceremony for dead Lebanese kids?" asked Patrick Baz, Mideast photo director for AFP. "I'm totally stunned by first the question, and I can't imagine that somebody would think something like that would have happened."
The AP had three different photographers there who weren't always aware of what the others were doing, and filed their images to editors separately, said Santiago Lyon, director of photography.
There are also several reasons not to draw conclusions from time stamps, Lyon said. Following a news event like this, the AP doesn't distribute pictures sequentially; photos are moved based on news value and how quickly they are available for an editor to transmit.
The AP indicates to its members when they are sent on the wire, and member Web sites sometimes use a different time stamp to show when they are posted.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires
08-01-06 1710ET
Copyright (c) 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.


36 posted on 08/10/2006 1:57:59 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
Before Mapes, I would have accepted this at face value - now I wonder. Is the AP big enough to throw away 62 million Americans who happen to be conservative?

As Dirty Harry would say, "Do ya feel lucky?"

37 posted on 08/10/2006 2:07:40 PM PDT by GOPJ (Al Gore - the original "Millions Could Die" kind of guy....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Should Reuters be investigated?

YES!

By whom?

US!

We've brought down the media fascists before. We can do it again. The forces of liberty and truth shall prevail once more!

It's JAMA-time, baby!


38 posted on 08/10/2006 2:26:07 PM PDT by gophergas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
Green Helmet the movie director [Germany's NDR busts him in the act VIDEO]

You can see screen scrapes here:

39 posted on 08/10/2006 2:54:25 PM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The version I heard was that it was the battle of Waterloo that made Reuters famous. They had telegraph lines and riders or carrier pigeons to fill in the gaps. Reuters clients got the word of Napoleon's defeat before anyone else, and were able to sell francs and buy rubles before the markets caught up.


40 posted on 08/10/2006 2:58:56 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gophergas
It's JAMA-time, baby!

What does the Journal of the American Medical Association have to do with ... oh. Never mind.

41 posted on 08/10/2006 3:03:50 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
To: AmericanMade1776 Interestingly, I just did a websearch and discovered that the Rothschilds purchased Reuters back in the 1800's because they did not like the media coverage they were getting. Don't know how much of it they still own. 34 posted on 08/10/2006 4:53:48 PM EDT by Brilliant

Now we are cooking with gas. Not the first time some haughty tauty Brit got greedy and tried to cover it up.

42 posted on 08/10/2006 4:01:09 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

In the 1840s, the latest technology was the electric telegraph and Paul Julius Reuter, a German-Jew, saw that news need no longer take days or weeks to travel from one country to another. In 1850, the 34-year-old Reuter was based in Aachen on the border of Germany and Belgium and began to use the newly opened Berlin-Aachen telegraph to send news back to Berlin. But there was a 76-mile gap in the telegraph between Aachen and Brussels. Reuter spotted the opportunity to speed up news between Brussels and Berlin by using carrier pigeons to bridge the gap in the telegraph.

In 1851, Reuter moved to London as attempts to lay a submarine telegraph cable from Dover to Calais looked like succeeding, after failures in 1847 and 1850. He set up his "Submarine Telegraph" office in October 1851 just before the opening of the cable in November, and agreed a contract with the London Stock Exchange to provide stock prices from the continental exchanges in return for access to the London prices, which he supplied to Paris brokers.

In 1865, Reuter's private firm was restructured and became a limited company called Reuter's Telegram Company.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters


43 posted on 08/10/2006 4:17:58 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

In the early 19th century Rothschild set up a Europe-wide network of messengers and carrier pigeon stations, gathering information that could affect his investments. He soon garnered a reputation for being first with the news.

According to popular legend, when the Battle of Waterloo was being fought in June 1815, other speculators watched Rothschild's stocks in an attempt to guess who would win. Shortly after the battle ended, and long before anyone else knew who was the victor, he began selling stocks. Everyone assumed this meant Napoleon had won and Europe was lost. Panic selling ensued. When prices crashed, Rothschild bought everything in sight and made a packet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschilds


44 posted on 08/10/2006 4:21:21 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Speaking of Rothschilds....read how they fit into this opinion piece about Mel Gibson's DUI

Gibson's claim that Jews have caused all the world's wars is only a less subtle and more grandiose version of the current mantra that "neoconservatives" have led us into war in Iraq. Make no mistake, most critics on both the left and right who inveigh against "neoconservatives" really mean "the Jews" or "Jewish influence" has caused this war. Old-fashioned anti-Semitism used to blame "Jewish bankers" for controlling the world, now, apparently, it's Jewish intellectuals who pull the strings. The Rothschilds have been replaced as villains by Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, William Kristol and Charles Krauthammer.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20060803/cm_uc_crlchx/linda_chavez20060803

45 posted on 08/10/2006 4:32:32 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Hmmmm... Guess it hadn't occurred to me that the Rothschilds were Jewish. Interesting.


46 posted on 08/10/2006 5:39:36 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
I wonder if you are the one who posted an earlier link to wikipedia's discussion of media bias. Whoever it was, if they are involved in editing wikipedia, I have a suggestion on the list of Journalism_scandals on the site:

Contents

[]

I notice the absence of any referece in this list to the inaccurate and premature call of Florida for Gore before the polls were closed in all of Florida during the 2000 election . . . followed the next morning by an orgy of condemnation of Fox News Channel for calling the Florida election right. With one clear exception, the delay between the closing of any state's polls and the call of that state for Bush was longer than the delay between the closing of another state's polls and the calling of that state for Gore, with Gore ultimately winning the state by a smaller margin. And the journalists themselves made a point of the fact that the calls of states for Bush were coming in slower than expected.

Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate


47 posted on 08/10/2006 5:42:06 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Brilliant wrote: Hmmmm... Guess it hadn't occurred to me that the Rothschilds were Jewish. Interesting.

Me either, did not know.

48 posted on 08/10/2006 7:16:40 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Thanks for that list of Journalism Scandals, I hear this New Scandal in the Media has a name... REUTERGATE.


49 posted on 08/10/2006 7:18:43 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson