Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaxRelief

Serious question: How do we know the pictures were not taken in the order 3 - 2 - 1?

Really the only thing that may indicate he took them out of suitcase is doll clothes, unless, of course, he fixed the doll before putting it in the suitcase.

Note: I of course believe they go 1-2-3, but in terms of absolute concrete proof - what proof beyond reasonable doubt is there #1 was taken first chronologically?


27 posted on 08/11/2006 12:13:41 PM PDT by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Julliardsux

Any chance someone can find other photos of the famous wedding dress mannequin?


31 posted on 08/11/2006 12:15:36 PM PDT by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Julliardsux
He may have been putting the doll back in. Look closely at the suitcase, I don't see tinky-winky or Minnie mouse in it. Can you logically explain why, if it was the last picture taken, minnie and tinky aren't visible?

I sure can't. The only logical explanation for me is that he is returning the doll after staging minnie and tinky, if he is in fact placing the doll in the suitcase. In either case, it's blatantly obvious that this man isn't cleaning up from a bomb, he's emplacing propaganda. Add the proof of how clean the toys are, and this media hit piece is busted.

48 posted on 08/11/2006 12:26:09 PM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Julliardsux; EODGUY

Er, um.

The fact that the VERY CLEAN green bag of OTHER CLEAN TOYS was place directly on top of the grimy and dusty REAL WORLD debris from the bombing.

That bag hadn't even been in place long enough to get the bottom dirty.

Did you see the WTC bomb victims at street level after the buildings collapsed?

Everything was covered in fine powder. Everything: inside purses, under coats, inside clothes and undergarments.... between sheets of paper in books inside stores in nearby streets.

And you're going to try to pretend that "toys" found in the wreckage of a building just blown up are CLEAN?

This guy COULD NOT, IN ANY WAY, have "picked up" toys from the bombing and put them into the bag..


51 posted on 08/11/2006 12:28:17 PM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Julliardsux

No expert here but lots of experience with dolls :o) - he appears to be holding the doll by an arm in picture 1 and then voila! The doll has no arms.


190 posted on 08/11/2006 8:33:13 PM PDT by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Julliardsux

yeah-

I mean- this guy could have shown up in the bombed out ruins with his shiny new bag- and been searching for (no- not family heirlooms or family photos) shiny new toys that "survived" the blast......

just as Sharif showed up with his camera......

but proof? you want proof? talk to Rather and Mapes...


214 posted on 08/12/2006 9:03:44 AM PDT by eeevil conservative (JOHN BOLTON FOR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson