Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican Left seeks annulment of over 3 million votes in presidential election recount (Translation)
La Crónica de Hoy ^ | August 12, 2006 | Daniel Blancas Madrigal ( translated by self )

Posted on 08/12/2006 11:18:33 AM PDT by StJacques

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
Well; this will tell you how the recount is going. Lopez Obrador and his leftist coalition are now seeking to have the ballot boxes in over 11,000 precincts favorable to Calderon annulled to give him the victory. I do not see any chance this wish will be granted, but the change in strategy by Lopez Obrador shows that it is all slipping away from him.

I do not have anything more on the specific votes for the recount at this moment beyond what I posted last night. But I will update this thread with those new numbers as they come in and I will ping the list.
1 posted on 08/12/2006 11:18:34 AM PDT by StJacques
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc; CedarDave; Pikachu_Dad; BunnySlippers; machogirl; NinoFan; chilepepper; ...
A Mex-Elex ping for you all.

Anyone wishing to keep track of all the articles translated from Mexican news sources can use the forum's "keyword search" option with the unique keyword "STJTRANSLATION" (or just click it above)
2 posted on 08/12/2006 11:20:30 AM PDT by StJacques (Liberty is always unfinished business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: StJacques

AlGore must be acting as a consultant to Obrador's campaign. Like Florida in 2000, they want to change the rules in mid-recount, when the recount is not going their way.


4 posted on 08/12/2006 11:24:39 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

5 posted on 08/12/2006 11:25:40 AM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cellularmania77
Until we don't hear from a government body.......

We already have not heard from a government body, so should we jump to conclusions now? ;)

Just funning with you.

6 posted on 08/12/2006 11:27:30 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StJacques
Time to bring in the professionals!


7 posted on 08/12/2006 11:31:52 AM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques
Of course, there were no overcounts or undercounts in ObraGore-favorable districts. Right.

This sounds like the typical Algore only my my votes, not his votes strategy. It didn't work for Algore. It hopefully won't work for ObraGore.
8 posted on 08/12/2006 11:33:35 AM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cellularmania77
"Until we don't hear from a government body on this partial recount we should make no conclusions."

Across the numerous articles from Mexican news sources whose content I have been putting up on another thread, see my posts #21, 30, & 40; you can see that, whether you believe the reports of the PRD or PAN that the official tallies of the recounted ballots taken in sum will not represent an increase of more than, roughly, 5,000 votes for Lopez Obrador. So even in the words of his own spokesmen the official vote counts certified by the on-site magistrates of the Electoral Tribunal are not sufficient to justify their call for a full nationwide recount.

What is happening here now is that Lopez Obrador and his people are changing strategy. They know that they're not going to be able to show an increase in their vote totals sufficient to justify carrying out a full nationwide recount, so what they are now doing is alleging that inconsistencies in the reporting of votes revealed by the hand recount mandate that those votes be thrown out altogether. In effect, they are asking the Electoral Tribunal to rule that the voting in Calderon's ballot boxes did not meet a standard of acceptability and therefore all votes in those boxes should be thrown out.

cellularmania77, I'm just going to guess that you've been through a close "recount watch" or two and you've learned the wisdom of Yogi Berra's dictum that it ain't over till it's over. Am I right? I feel your anxiety. Forgive us if we've contributed to it.
9 posted on 08/12/2006 11:42:44 AM PDT by StJacques (Liberty is always unfinished business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Interesting pic there. There actually is a Mexican equivalent I can point out here, so consider this just an "FYI" post.

The ballots in question are paper ones on which voters mark their choice with an "X" across the square for the candidate using a provided crayon. Under Mexican law the "X" may not cross between two "squares" or the ballot is considered "null." Over the past two days there have been numerous complaints from the PRD (Lopez Obrador's party) representatives that the magistrates are being too strict in enforcing this rule. And my reading of the several news articles I have seen suggests that there have been some variations across the country in the way the law is interpreted.
10 posted on 08/12/2006 11:48:05 AM PDT by StJacques (Liberty is always unfinished business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

They want three millions votes annulled? BWAHAHAHAHAHA - Oh, cry me a Rio Grande river!


11 posted on 08/12/2006 12:50:32 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc; CedarDave; Pikachu_Dad; BunnySlippers; machogirl; NinoFan; chilepepper; ...
Well everyone, how does the following stack up on the "threat level" scale?

Lopez Obrador was speaking today in the southern Mexican state of Chiapas, which covers most of Mexico's border with Guatemala, campaigning for the For the Good of All coalition candidate for the governorship of the state, Juan Sabines. The following statement is quoted in an article (in Spanish) on the El Universal web site:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

. . . Lopez Obrador stated that if the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Power of the Federation (TEPJF) gives the victory to Felipe Calderon he will use everything that is within reach, with peaceful civil resistance, to prevent that which, according to him, imposes a president [on Mexico]. . . .

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I take that to be a clear statement that Lopez Obrador is not going to permit Calderon to become President, even if the Electoral Tribunal declares him the winner. The question we all have to ask ourselves is "do we believe him"? My personal answer is that I do believe him and my worries that Mexico is heading for a calamity have not been diminished.

And on that subject, I want to post a political cartoon from Monday's edition of El Universal. The caption in the balloon is "WHO WON?" and I've translated the cartoon's title


The Peaceful Resistance Continues



  
12 posted on 08/12/2006 12:53:42 PM PDT by StJacques (Liberty is always unfinished business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr

13 posted on 08/12/2006 12:57:42 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr

14 posted on 08/12/2006 12:58:20 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: StJacques
Lopez Obrador was speaking today in the southern Mexican state of Chiapas, which covers most of Mexico's border with Guatemala,

I find it suspicious that he choses Chiapas right NOW to make this statement. Chiapas being the most socially and politically unstable part of Mexico. Sounds like he's itching for revolution.

15 posted on 08/12/2006 12:58:36 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: StJacques
Let's see what the betters think lately:
16 posted on 08/12/2006 12:59:04 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

During the past 3 days or so, ObraGore's prospects (in online betting folks' eyes) seem to have fallen by about 50%. They were pretty low to begin with. Even his own cronies have apparently started withdrawing their bets which they likely waged for publicity's sake in hopes that they could get a "real" job in his administration :-)


17 posted on 08/12/2006 1:01:40 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

I take the leftists at their word if it is a close election and they want power. Civil war is at hand, and if it comes, the left in this country will back them. Whew - is it me or is it HOT right now?


18 posted on 08/12/2006 1:07:57 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

I forgot - I really LIKE that graphic!


19 posted on 08/12/2006 1:09:55 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

>>>And my reading of the several news articles I have seen suggests that there have been some variations across the country in the way the law is interpreted.<<<

Might this be grounds for recounts nationwide, if not revoting or something similarly alarming?


Meanwhile, does this passage show reason for us to be concerned?


>>>Horacio Duarte, representative of the PRD in the IFE3, asserted that in 5,177 electoral packets of which he has reports, [the coalition] has detected 18,142 ballots overcounted4 and 51,658 undercounted with relation to the precinct reports for the voting day of July 2. By last night the count had climbed to more than 100,000 ballots in both categories.<<<


20 posted on 08/12/2006 1:10:30 PM PDT by Shuttle Shucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson