Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nasrallah Rules
The American Spectator ^ | 14 August 2006 | Jed Babbin

Posted on 08/14/2006 4:49:56 AM PDT by unionblue83

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: 1234
'til the West stops bein anxious 'bout killin civilian shields, all military/war talk is blather

Why does a terrorist suddenly become a citizen when he is killed? If you support and consort with terrorist you are a terrorist. (Kind of like walking like a duck)

21 posted on 08/14/2006 6:29:37 AM PDT by River_Wrangler (Nothing difficult is ever easy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
If Olmert were removed and competent leadership put in place, the first rocket attack from Lebanon would be answered with an air and ground campaign that would sweep through Lebanon north to the Syrian border in a manner that emulated Sherman's march through Georgia.

Israel had a chance to kill two birds with one stone. Clean out the infection in Lebannon and end its transmission from Syria. The decision not to neutralize Syria was a bad one IMO. Israel cannot afford to look weak.

22 posted on 08/14/2006 6:30:22 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: unionblue83

Olmert and his cohorts are about as useful as an air conditioner at the North Pole.


23 posted on 08/14/2006 7:31:36 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (The Arab League jihad continues on like a fart in an elevator - FR American in Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: River_Wrangler

Civilian shields arent there because they want to be!


24 posted on 08/14/2006 7:33:30 AM PDT by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: unionblue83

If there was a UN mandated cease fire after Dunkirk, the British would have lost.

If there was a UN mandated cease fire after Pearl Harbor and the fall of the Philippines, the US would have lost.

Israel started slowly and badly, but the loss came when Rice raised her hand at the UN.


25 posted on 08/14/2006 7:36:49 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Bush Doctrine- Old: Fight terrorists. New: Cease fire with terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
What was Israel's strategic objective in this war? The Media says it was "to destroy Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon." This was not a goal that could be attained by military means alone. As things sit now, Hezbollah will probably be in a postion to increase it's representation in the Lebanese government -- possibly taking control of the entire country.

Iran created Hezbollah, but it's line-of-communications stetches through Syria. Iran probably cannot be attacked decisively (by Israel) without resorting to nukes. Syria is another matter. Syria is the lynch-pin.

What the IDF should have done was continue the operation into Lebanon & force the Syrians to intervene, then thrust down from the Golan on Damascus, cutting off the Syrian forces attempting to intervene. With Syria defeated, Hezbollah dies on the vine.

26 posted on 08/14/2006 7:47:18 AM PDT by Tallguy (The problem with this war is the name... You don't wage war against a tactic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: strategofr; All

So who's the one to step up? Livni? Moshe Ya'alon?


27 posted on 08/14/2006 8:56:05 AM PDT by unionblue83 (Duty is ours; consequences are God's. -- Stonewall Jackson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Starboard; Tallguy

Agree with both of you in the good points you made in your posts re Israel and Syria. Olmert's handling of this affair is a major disappointment and a big setback for us and Israel in the WOIF (War on Islamic Fascism).


28 posted on 08/14/2006 9:29:08 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: unionblue83
After Olmert's cabinet approved the cease-fire yesterday, his foreign minister, Tzipi Livni, said the UN deal would, result in a "change in the rules of the game" between Israel and Lebanon. She added, "It can lead to the real change in the Middle East that we have all been waiting for." A more complete detachment from reality is unimaginable.

Hard words, but true.

29 posted on 08/14/2006 10:00:39 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
WOIF (War on Islamic Fascism)

Nice touch. We need clarity at a time like this. Terrorism describes the symptom, not the source.

30 posted on 08/14/2006 2:21:08 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Nice touch. We need clarity at a time like this. Terrorism describes the symptom, not the source.

Thanks. I've decided to use only that terminology--WOIF (War on Islamic Fascism) in FR posts. Join me. Maybe we can change the terminology. There's enough folks on FR that it could just catch on.

31 posted on 08/14/2006 3:11:08 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson