Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado: Marijuana Amendment Will Be On Ballot
The Daily Times-Call ^ | August 17, 2006

Posted on 08/17/2006 3:38:19 PM PDT by Wolfie

Marijuana Amendment Will Be On Ballot

Denver -- Coloradans are to decide this fall whether to make it legal under state law for anyone age 21 and older to possess up to an ounce of marijuana. Secretary of State Gigi Dennis said Wednesday that backers of that initiative had turned in enough signatures to qualify for the Nov. 7 general election. The proposal will be Amendment 44 on the state ballot, Dennis said.

Under Colorado law, anyone in possession of an ounce or less of marijuana can be charged with a Class 2 petty offense, punishable by a fine of up to $100.

Legislative staffers preparing an analysis of the initiative report that during the 2005-06 state budget year, state courts convicted 3,700 adults for possession of such amounts of marijuana.

The legalization proposal is being pushed by SAFER, an organization that asserts that marijuana is a “Safer Alternative For Enjoyable Recreation” than alcohol.

“The campaign will highlight the hypocrisy of laws that prohibit the use of marijuana while allowing and even encouraging the use of alcohol, an infinitely more harmful drug,” SAFER spokesman Mason Tvert said Wednesday.

If approved by voters, Amendment 44 would change state law to allow adults age 21 and older to possess or use small amounts of marijuana, according to the legislative staff analysis, as long as that use doesn’t occur in public. It still would be illegal for anyone younger than 21 to possess any amount of marijuana or for people 21 and older to possess amounts more than an ounce.

It also would still be illegal for individuals age 18 and older to transfer any amount of marijuana to anyone younger than 15.

State laws also would continue to ban: growing or selling marijuana; open and public display, use or consumption of marijuana; and driving under the influence of marijuana.

SAFER has noted that even if voters OK the initiative, home-rule cities and towns would still have the ability to ticket and prosecute marijuana users under local ordinances.

Last year, SAFER successfully campaigned for an ordinance change to make it legal for an adult to possess up to an ounce of marijuana in Denver, but the organization has complained that Denver continues to prosecute people under state law.

Tvert said in an interview that voter passage of a state legalization measure would “send a large message” to home-rule municipalities “about how the people of Colorado feel about this.”

Tvert said alcohol abuse “contributes to social problems like fighting, sexual assault, property damage and domestic violence. Marijuana use has never been linked to these types of issues.”

Tvert said he expects Amendment 44 to be opposed by members of the state’s law enforcement community, including Colorado Attorney General John Suthers.

Suthers spokeswoman Kristen Holtzman said Wednesday that “the attorney general’s position on this issue has not changed. He is adamantly against the legalization of marijuana.”

Foes of SAFER’s proposal have argued that marijuana use can lead someone to other illegal drugs and thus increase overall drug use and drug abuse in Colorado.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: bongbrigade; dopercrushonleroy; dopercrushonwoddies; election2006; knowyourleroy; leroyknowshisrights; mrleroy; mrleroybait; potheads; warondrugs; wod; woddiecrushonleroy; wodlist; wontmakeadifference
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

1 posted on 08/17/2006 3:38:20 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Right, Wrong, or Indifferent, isnt this in conflict with Federal Law?


2 posted on 08/17/2006 3:43:56 PM PDT by Concho (IRS--Americas real terrorist organization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I am betting that alot of the people gathering signatures and those signing looked like they were heading to a Grateful Dead concert


3 posted on 08/17/2006 3:44:16 PM PDT by Bogtrotter52 (Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

There was no reason to make it illegal in the first place. The US army did a large study in Panama years before and found no adverse effects on the troops. The Mexicans that were associated with it at the time caused racism to be the main influence in characterizing it as potentially dangerous and setting up the "stamp" issue. I do not smoke it personally. (flame suit on)


4 posted on 08/17/2006 3:44:29 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Concho

Not exactly. Colorado can't stop the Feds from enforcing Federal (national) drug laws, but their state laws don't have to be in synch. They are deciding what their STATE law (and hence their law enforcement) should be.


5 posted on 08/17/2006 3:45:37 PM PDT by Huck (There is a $2.00 service charge for this tagline---do you still wish to proceed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Perhaps nothing more powerful than persons that have turned against a conviction they once believed in. John Lott for example, author of: More Guns, Less Crime. Here comes LEAP.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition -- LEAP. In the trenches, judges, prosecutors, LEOs, DEA, FBI etc. that have witnessed the WOD from the inside. Watch the 13 minute introduction video. Its excellent. The Web site is most informative.

6 posted on 08/17/2006 3:51:15 PM PDT by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Man, I was up in the Springs a while back and the whole place looked like a college campus in 1965. If they get it on the ballot dont be surprised that enough of those grateful dead fans crawl out from under their rocks and vote it in.


7 posted on 08/17/2006 3:51:30 PM PDT by Concho (IRS--Americas real terrorist organization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bogtrotter52

So?


8 posted on 08/17/2006 3:58:12 PM PDT by The Worthless Miracle ("Better put some ice on that")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Tvert said alcohol abuse “contributes to social problems like fighting, sexual assault, property damage and domestic violence. Marijuana use has never been linked to these types of issues.”

I smoked pot (as almost all my freinds did) for more than 20 years and have seen all kinds of other "issues" linked to marijuana use.

I've known people who drinking never displayed the problems linked to alcohol above, but when they smoked pot had all kinds of mental problems and couldn't drive a car safely.

I still don't think pot is that big of a deal in general, but I can say that since I quit, my mind is clearer and I am more stable emotionally than during the years I smoked.

I wonder what companies would do, that test for (and prohibit smoking) pot, if it became legal?

9 posted on 08/17/2006 3:58:26 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

if it passes, put a fork in California real estate, it'll be done


10 posted on 08/17/2006 4:02:23 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Concho

I'd vote it in.


11 posted on 08/17/2006 4:04:04 PM PDT by Huck (There is a $2.00 service charge for this tagline---do you still wish to proceed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"I still don't think pot is that big of a deal in general, but I can say that since I quit, my mind is clearer and I am more stable emotionally than during the years I smoked."

I think there are two lessons here. No one should use intoxicants in large quantities or frequently. Two, the government shouldn't be involved in it.

12 posted on 08/17/2006 4:04:46 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

"I smoked pot (as almost all my freinds did) for more than 20 years and have seen all kinds of other "issues" linked to marijuana use."

It's a sad state of the pro-marijuana movement when the best line they can come up with is: "alcohol is worse."


13 posted on 08/17/2006 4:06:47 PM PDT by NapkinUser (CNN/Fox News: Blah blah Israel blah blah Lebanon blah blah Palestine blah blah Middle East blah...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
"There was no reason to make it illegal in the first place."

Be careful what you wish for...legalization will be followed by MASSIVE taxation, and the price will skyrocket, causing the same black market that exists today.

The difference will be that the price will undoubtedly rise (due to taxes), and the supply will continue to be mainly from illegal sources.

14 posted on 08/17/2006 4:09:48 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
....the government shouldn't be involved in it.

I saw beautiful South Beach Florida turned into a hell-hole by crack heads for a couple of years and THANK GOD the government got involved and cleaned it up.

The idea that Govt shouldn't be involved in drug use enforcement is totally nuts.

15 posted on 08/17/2006 5:26:18 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"The idea that Govt shouldn't be involved in drug use enforcement is totally nuts"

I don't smoke anything and the strongest thing I drink is coffee but the idea that the nitwits in the government can tell grown people what vegetables they can enjoy is what is totally nuts

16 posted on 08/17/2006 5:42:56 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
It's a sad state of the pro-marijuana movement when the best line they can come up with is: "alcohol is worse."

The pro-marijuana movement has always been sad, and impotent, probably reflecting the passive useless disposition of most pot heads.

Yes, getting high was fun for years during my youth, but most of these were wasted years.

Amazingly, I smoked pot all through college and yet graduated first in my class with a perfect 4.0 GPA. Weird.

17 posted on 08/17/2006 5:46:57 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
I don't smoke anything and the strongest thing I drink is coffee but the idea that the nitwits in the government can tell grown people what vegetables they can enjoy is what is totally nuts

You are a really unusual case. You know that don't you.

18 posted on 08/17/2006 5:49:50 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Huck
It will be interesting to see most or all states' laws decriminalize cannabis. That would then put the fed in the clear and unarguable position of being a dictator. Some entertaining explanations would ensue.

I'm saving my popcorn for that thread.

19 posted on 08/17/2006 5:53:11 PM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"You are a really unusual case. You know that don't you."

Because I think grown-ups should have the last word on what goes into their bodies and because I trust the individual to decide for himself what folly he will pursue? That makes me unusual?

Just wow.

20 posted on 08/17/2006 5:54:57 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson