Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another example of why the NSA decision is absurd nonsense. HERE for all the perpetual screamers is WHY anyone even marginally Conservative wants the GOP to stay in power. This judge was appointed by Carter. As these Carter/Ford/Nixon judges retire WHO do you want appointing their replacements? ONE thing and one thing only should be on Conservative minds this year. Judges, Judges, Judges.
1 posted on 08/18/2006 4:59:25 AM PDT by MNJohnnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

Welcome to the real world of judges.

If you want to be frightened by the level of judicial incompetence, visit any state bar convention. (not the ABA, they are licence irrelevant) Those who are actual licensed lawyers sitting on the bench.

You will be SHOCKED at the level of senility (as in medical don't know where they are) of some of these judges.

Carter paid her off with this judicial appointment and now we have an annex to the 9th circus.


2 posted on 08/18/2006 5:12:36 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

This is a Jimmah Carter, affirmative action judge...what can the nation expect from such an appointee?


3 posted on 08/18/2006 5:14:50 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Excellent evaluation.


4 posted on 08/18/2006 5:15:53 AM PDT by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Did he slice and dice her or what? Wow! "Judge" Diggs-Taylor really messed up on this one. Assuming the Court of Appeals is no less harsh than Bryan Cunningham, that will be the first step in getting her removed from the bench before she can do more harm.


5 posted on 08/18/2006 5:15:57 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Tom Gallagher - the anti-Crist [FL Governor, 2006 primary])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

In 1976 I busted one of my soldiers with 2 POUNDS OF HEROIN. One of Jimmy Carter's newly-appointed federal magistrates gave the perp 3 months in federal lockup! I'll bet that magistrate is still on the bench.


6 posted on 08/18/2006 5:16:26 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
I will add one more thing to your list of what should be on our minds this year: Survival of our way of life in the face of terrorist attempts to bring down freedom loving peoples! This article is terrific in it's explanation of the many flaws in this politically motivated ruling.
7 posted on 08/18/2006 5:17:17 AM PDT by borisbob69 (Old shade is better than new shade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Let's hope the COurt of Appeals makes short work of this and foregoes the professional courtesies and calls Taylor's ruling exactly what it is: a Crock.


8 posted on 08/18/2006 5:20:24 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

I'm not a bushbot, and I even know that Bush is not a conservative, but this is a battle over judges, and the one thing he has done right, other than the execution of the WOT,is his appointment of judges ( he made one mistake, but the base, with the help of certain liberal democrats made her go away, and was replaced with a real judge ).


9 posted on 08/18/2006 5:25:15 AM PDT by joe fonebone (Israel, taking out the world's trash since 1948.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Andrewksu

ping


10 posted on 08/18/2006 5:28:57 AM PDT by centurion316 (Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida Worldwide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The funny (in a self delusional way) thing about the sort of stuff like this, is that the leftists actually think that if they do these things, the islamofascists will actually like them, rather than looking at them as disposable, useful idiots.

Does anyone else remember the calls of moonbats upset that New York was attacked, and they couldn't understand why the islamofascists would attack people who didn't vote for George Bush!

Savage is right. Liberalism IS a mental disorder!

Mark


11 posted on 08/18/2006 5:33:55 AM PDT by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

... the only plausible explanation is that she wanted the result she wanted and was willing to ignore and misread vast portions of constitutional law to get there, gambling the lives and security of her fellow Americans in the bargain.
.
.
.
.
TREASON in the name of politics.


12 posted on 08/18/2006 5:45:14 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Great Article!


13 posted on 08/18/2006 6:11:29 AM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

This woman is dumb as a bag of hair. She's probably one of those "9/11 was an inside job" nutbags/


16 posted on 08/18/2006 6:55:08 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Even my liberal local paper ran a wire service story/headline suggesting the ruling would likely be overturned.


17 posted on 08/18/2006 6:58:50 AM PDT by zook ("We all knew someone in primary school who had a really powerful magnet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Activist, Leftist, Carter Appointee, Diggs-Taylor
19 posted on 08/18/2006 7:31:57 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
Judge Taylor, a law professor, has been on the bench since 1979. She is decidedly not an amateur. So, how to explain her first-year failing-grade opinion? Regrettably, the only plausible explanation is that she wanted the result she wanted and was willing to ignore and misread vast portions of constitutional law to get there, gambling the lives and security of her fellow Americans in the bargain.

Well, that's the only plausible explanation only if you're afraid to question some of your own assumptions. The assumption that since the judge is a law professor and has been on the bench since 1979, therefore she is not an amateur, is ripe for examination. Could it be that this judge is another "Ward Churchill"? Graduated from high school and college without proper qualifications, admitted to law school without proper qualifications, hired by a law school or law firm without proper qualifications, and appointed to her judgeship without proper qualifications, all the while being lauded for her impeccable qualifications?

20 posted on 08/18/2006 7:58:39 AM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

bttt


22 posted on 08/18/2006 9:06:36 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Great article. However, he doesn't even mention her nonsensical "standing" ruling, which should have cut off the whole case.


23 posted on 08/18/2006 10:32:43 AM PDT by half-cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson