Excellent read. I will finish it a bit later but from what I did read it makes me wonder how did she get past the congress?
The analysis I have read about this "ruling" indicate that it is an embarassment. Appointed in 78 by Carter, in the height of the affirmative action era, one wonders about competence here, not just partisanship. Legal scholars, even those of the left, refrain from phrases like "King George" (not widely reported in the press) in legal documents. Quite shameful.