Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill
tobyhill wrote:
This judge needed to be booted from the case from the start for prejudicial bias.

Are you kiddin'? That's why she GOT the case to begin with!

- John

23 posted on 08/18/2006 7:24:36 AM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Fishrrman

I know how she got the case, judge shopping, but I also blame the Government Lawyers for not filing any motions to have her removed based anything because everything she's done is idiotic.


24 posted on 08/18/2006 7:29:07 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Fishrrman

BTW; part of her ruling says she's giving standing because of the "very secrecy of activity" but then she says she's giving standing because the program isn't so secret. She said the plaintiffs suffered damages but can only come up with restricted in their jobs yet doesn't even know who or how they're being restricted. She can't even make heads or tails of her own ruling and that makes me wonder if she was bought out?


27 posted on 08/18/2006 7:36:26 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson