What???? Water shortage???!!!
Posted on 08/22/2006 7:36:34 AM PDT by cogitator
One in three people is enduring one form or another of water scarcity, according to new findings released by the Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture at World Water Week in Stockholm. These alarming findings totally overrun predictions that this situation would come to pass in 2025.
"Worrisome predictions in 2000 had forecast that one third of the world population would be affected by water scarcity by 2025. our findings from the just-concluded research show the situation to be even worse," says Frank Rijsberman, Director General of the International Water Management Institute (IWMI).
"Already in 2005, more than a third of the world population is affected by water scarcity. We will have to change business as usual in order to deal with growing scarcity water crisis we see in some countries like India, China, and the Colorado River basin of USA and Mexico."
The Comprehensive Assessment, carried out by 700 experts from around the world over the last five years, indicates that one third of the world's population is currently living in places where water is either over-used - leading to falling groundwater levels and drying rivers - or can not be accessed due to the absence of the appropriate infrastructure.
The Assessment, the first of its kind critically examining policies and practices of water use and development in the agricultural sector over the last 50 years, was co-sponsored by the CGIAR, FAo, the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, and the Convention on Biological Diversity in a bid to find solutions to the challenge of balancing the water-food-environment needs.
It was spearheaded by IWMI, one of 15 agricultural research centres supported by the CGIAR that are striving to increase food production, increase rural incomes, and safeguard the environment.
Rijsberman explained, "our results show that one quarter of the world's population live in river basins where water is physically scarce - water is over-used and people are affected by environmental consequences from falling groundwater levels to dying rivers that no longer reach the sea. Another one billion people live in river basins where water is economically scarce - water is available in rivers and aquifers, but the infrastructure is lacking to make this water available to people."
Access to reliable, safe and affordable water is understood and accepted as a key step out of poverty for the world's 800 million rural poor. Many more people dependent on rivers, lakes and other wetlands risk falling into poverty because of declining groundwater supplies, loss of water rights and access, pollution, flooding and drought.
David Molden who led the Comprehensive Assessment says, "To feed the growing population and reduce malnourishment, the world has three choices: expand irrigation by diverting more water to agriculture and building more dams, at a major cost to the environment; expand the area under rain-fed agriculture at the expense of natural areas through massive deforestation and other habitat destruction; or do more with the water we already use. We must grow more crop per drop, more meat and milk per drop, and more fish per drop."
Africa's savannahs - which have most of the world's poorest people who typically rely on rain-fed agriculture - are singled out by the Assessment as holding the greatest potential for increasing water productivity, increasing agricultural yields per unit water used.
"The savannahs are fragile and the rainfall is variable; making them productive systems for farmers is very difficult," says Rijsberman. "But this year, the World Food Prize goes to three scientists who have done exactly that for the Brazilian savannahs, the cerrados. The Brazilians used improved varieties of African grasses to conquer their savannahs. They proved that it can be done. The same miracle needs to be repeated in Africa."
Already the consequences of water scarcity are evident in a number of countries. Egypt imports more than half of its food because it does not have enough water to grow it domestically. Australia is faced with major water scarcity in the Murray-Darling Basin as a result of diverting large quantities of water for use in agriculture. The Aral Sea disaster is another example where massive diversions of water to agriculture have caused widespread water scarcity, and one of the world's worst environmental disasters.
Agriculture uses up to 70 times more water to produce food than is used in drinking and other domestic purposes, including cooking, washing and bathing. As a rule of thumb, each calorie consumed as food requires about one litre of water to produce. In Thailand, the daily water required to grow food is about 2800 litres per person per day - 40 percent for cereals, 20 percent for animal products and the rest for pulses, fruits, sugar and oils.
Italians use 3300 litres per person per day, half for ham and cheese and a third for pasta and bread. Clearly livestock and fish will play a significant role in future water use, but remarkably their importance is underestmated in water resources management.
Despite the impending threat, the Assessment identifies numerous bright spots - innovative approaches that hold potential for the future. These include very low cost technologies that facilitate access to, and use of water by, the rural poor. With health issues addressed, for example, people can effectively use urban wastewaters as a productive resource. Irrigation could also be reformed and transformed to reduce water wastage and increase productivity.
There will be many difficult choices entailing tradeoffs between city and agriculture users, between food production and the environment, and between fishers and farmers. There is simply not enough water to go around for all needs, yet allocation choices have to be made. In closed basins, where all water has already been allocated, giving water to one group means taking water away from another.
"The Assessment shows that while a third of the world population faces water scarcity, it is not because there is not enough water to go round, but because of choices people make," Molden says.
"It is possible to reduce water scarcity, feed people and address poverty, but the key trade-off is with the environment. People and their governments will face some tough decisions on how to allocate and manage water. Not all situations are going to be a win-win for the parties involved, and in most cases there are winners and losers. If you don't consciously debate and make tough choices, more people, especially the poor, and the environment will continue to pay the price."
Yes.....which means don't bathe or wash your clothes in it if you also intend to drink it use it for irrigation. Hear that, Third World?
GLOBAL WARMING. Let's call ALGORE now. Help us Al.
They could drink Sprite...
The FRENCH are way ahead on this. /sarc
I have a start up company focusing on advanced water treatment using ozone. There is a lot to this subject, and I believe technologies such as ozone can play an important part. I encourage interested parties to see my profile page.
BTW: The US consumes about 1500 gallons of water per day per capita.
Nuclear power plants are a fine way to make millions of gallons of fresh water from sea water.
HOW DO THESE IDIOTIC CONFERNECES GET ANY AIR PLAY AT ALL!!??!!!?!
Sorry for the caps, but it is really getting to me!!
and eat cake?
Since my monthly water bill is for between 1200 and 1500 gals, I want to know who's the spendthrift?
Another one billion people live in river basins where water is economically scarce - water is available in rivers and aquifers, but the infrastructure is lacking to make this water available to people."
So, they have water that is available, and they want us to invest money in making it more available and more easily consumed, therefore creating an even greater water shortage..
The Aral sea is drying up.. Why?
Because the rivers and aquifers have been made "economically available" to the people..
They now use so much water for agriculture and industry, and personal use, they have dried up the Aral Sea and turned the entire area into a desert..
The only water making it to the Aral Sea is the toxic waste runoff from industry and untreated sewage from populations along the rivers..
Now they want the developed world to help encourage other third-world countries to destroy their lands and water sources as well..
Something that escapes these loons is that there is, and always has been, the same amount of water on this earth. For some funny reason it has a tendency to move from one place to another (clouds, volcanos, solar activity and earthquakes)They try to sell the assumption that if someone uses a certain amount of water that it is gone forever flushed into some cosmic comode somewhere and deposited on Pluto.
No wonder people suffer from all this anxiety these days. Time to turn our television sets off.
No wonder it's atmosphere is getting thicker!!!
Thanks.. I was wondering about that.. ;o)
Uh.. ( its atmosphere... )
If I recall, about 70% of this world is water.
It would seem to me that building desalinization plants on a global scale and building the infrastructure to support these would be priority one of the UN.
I bet the Euroweenies and the Islamists would vie for these projects since they are so humanitarian in their ways.
Sam Kinnison would say: "Move to where the water is!"
Not to the CIA. The CIA 2015 report identified water scarcity as a possible cause of conflict.
First paragraph: " By 2015 nearly half the world's population—more than 3 billion people—will live in countries that are "water-stressed"—have less than 1,700 cubic meters of water per capita per year—mostly in Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, and northern China."
Key paragraph: "Water has been a source of contention historically, but no water dispute has been a cause of open interstate conflict; indeed, water shortages often have stimulated cooperative arrangements for sharing the scarce resource. But as countries press against the limits of available water between now and 2015, the possibility of conflict will increase."
Side note: there have been recent violent conflicts in India due to water shortages.
Water crisis deepens India's rural-urban rift
Excerpt: "Farmers in the southern part of the country have protested transferring water to Bangalore, one of the country's fastest-growing cities and the hub of its growing technology industry. Farmers in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh have opposed plans to channel water to New Delhi, the nation's dry, sprawling capital. Farmers in Kerala, a state on India's southwest coast, have forced a Coca-Cola factory to suspend operations over allegations that it was overusing groundwater and draining an aquifer they rely on for irrigation."
"But nowhere is the problem more acute than in Rajasthan, India's driest state, where access to water can often mean the difference between poverty and prosperity, life and death."
"The shooting in Sohela was only the latest instance of violence erupting over water in the state. In two separate incidents over a three-month span at the end of 2004, police killed six farmers in towns near the border with Pakistan during protests over the allocation of water from the Indira Gandhi Canal. The canal stretches 400 miles and was built to irrigate desert regions with water from the distant Indus River, which flows south from the Himalayas."
For those wanting a longterm investment..., check out PHO, an ETF (Exchange Traded Fund) which represents a basket of the world's leading water treatment firms...
Energy and water will be the places for your investments in the 21st Century!
Darn, this is just another excuse for my kids to use when I'm trying to get them in the bath.
Well, there are classic methods of compensation with your wife.
What???? Water shortage???!!!
Isn't global warming supposed to raise the sea levels because of melting of the polar ice caps? Maybe these people in "water stressed" nations should head up to the north pole and harvest all that ice before it melts and mixes with the salt water.
Several years ago I read about an idea to tow a tabular iceberg up to the Middle East and use the water from the iceberg. They'd spray an ablative coating on it to reduce melt rate. Googling... not much found, but apparently one of the clear problems is that even though they're big, they can shatter, and the little shattered pieces would melt too fast (and be hard to tow).
It's funny -- reading Google indicates that many people remember this iceberg-towing idea; I wonder where it actually originated.
Just paid $1,100.00 for a new well pump; the old one died after 18 years. Wouldn't trade having my own water supply for anything else in the world. Not even chocolate. ;)
As for this "study" follow the money...
The main problem is saline water (like sea water), the improvements in reverse osmosis the last years have been fantastic, and the technology will be cheaper in the future.
I agree. Advancements in RO have been impressive. Ozone can play a role as disinfectant and would make re-use of already de-salted water more practical.
I would presume that the daily per capita usage includes stuff like ag and other hidden water usage that most people don't even think about. That bottle of beer that you just had didn't get magically clean before it had beer poured into it, nor did the gallon jug in the frig holding your milk.
Guess I shouldda put a /s at the end of my post. My bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.