Posted on 08/22/2006 9:35:00 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
The laughter you hear is directed at you, Paul. I think it's the neo-cons.
Paul off his meds ping.
Those of us who actually love our country and our countrymen are "gullible" "chickenhawk" "Bushbots" who aren't really Americans.
NewsMax sucks. Big time.
The author apparently read the commission's report, but he didn't take his meds prior to drawing conclusions. Or maybe he drew his conclusions 20 years before he read the report, which could color his take on the issue.
Either way, the author's premise is wrong. On Free Republic alone, there are probably multiple dozens who have read the report in its entirety, and hundreds who have done so in part.
PCR must be really mad at Lew for stealing his girlfriend?
Look up "gullible" in the dictionary, and you'll find a picture of Paul Craig Roberts.
Paul is always a source of laughter no matter what subject his drug addled brain chooses to write about. This one is especially funny because he's lecturing us about facts - just one of many things he's uniquely unqualified to rant about.
Something tells me Paul hasn't seen the translations by jveritas. Or if he has, he ignores them!
Something tells me Paul hasn't seen the translations by jveritas. Or if he has, he ignores them!
Slowly, with deepening horror, I realized—he's serious. Oh, my.
This isn't liberalspeak, folks. It's off-the-end-of-the-table-American-Mercury-nutcase Right. There aren't wings in politics. It's a circle, and the Left and the Right meet in conspiracy cuckoo-land.
I cannot believe that this guy is considered a “conservative icon” by some people in the conservative movement. The man is a lunatic and a shame to conservatism.
Because the Chinese certainly know how to spread the truth amongst their own people. /sarc
Anyone have any idea or links to any analysis as to why that tower fell? I believe the official explanation was an accumulation of burning debris that set the tower on fire, etc, etc.
LOL
Put Paul Craig Roberts & Garrison Keilor in the same room and the smug levels would reach such dangerous proportions, the universe would implode.
:-)
I wonder who Paul's political godfather is.
Scientists and engineers, such as Clemson University Professor of Engineering Dr. Judy Woods and BYU Professor of Physics Dr. Steven Jones, have raised compelling questions about the official account of the collapse of the three WTC buildings. The basic problem for the government's account is that the buildings are known to have fallen at free-fall speed, a fact that is inconsistent with the government's "pancaking" theory in which debris from above collapsed the floors below. If the buildings actually "pancaked," then each floor below would have offered resistance to the floors above, and the elapsed time would have been much longer.
These experts have also calculated that the buildings did not have sufficient gravitational energy to accommodate the government's theory of the collapse. It is certainly a known and non-controversial fact among physicists and engineers that the only way buildings can collapse at free fall speed into their own footprints is by engineered demolition. Explosives are used to remove the support of floors below before the debris from above arrives. Otherwise, resistance is encountered and the time required for fall increases.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.