Skip to comments.
NSA Judge Anna Diggs Taylor Secretary of Fund that bankrolled Michigan ACLU
Judicial Watch ^
| 8/21/06
| Judicial Watch
Posted on 08/22/2006 8:06:06 PM PDT by motife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: georgiarat
Actually president Bush just said that yesterday. Unless we are going to blame GW because of the ruling. GW has bigger gonads than ANY president in modern times, including Reagan. Even though I liked Reagan allot and respected him, he never put himself on line AS MUCH AS GW.
21
posted on
08/22/2006 8:49:16 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: motife
Of course everyone remembers her involvement in the Uof M racial preferences case? When she tried hard to get that cas assigned to her instead of to the next judge in line?
22
posted on
08/22/2006 8:51:27 PM PDT
by
Redbob
To: jrooney
GW continues to amaze me. He is courageous and doesn't lose sight of his compassion and wisdom simply to please either party.
23
posted on
08/22/2006 8:53:13 PM PDT
by
Republic
(I have AMAZING CONFIDENCE and TRUST in our PRESIDENT! I LOVE HIM and his ENTIRE TEAM!)
To: Redbob
Any judge that campaigns to be assigned to a case versus just having a case assigned to them, is not fit to be a judge.
24
posted on
08/22/2006 8:56:17 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: Republic
He may not be the great speaker Reagan was that could woo people with his presence and charisma, but he is a GREAT STATEMAN and we are very fortunate to have him during these troubling times. He is the right man at the right time in history. History will judge him to be a great determined man and steady president. Just like Reagan was remembered with fondest when he was called home, so will GW when his time comes. I for one am proud he is my POTUS.
25
posted on
08/22/2006 9:00:28 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: jrooney
Unfortunately, history also will judge him on issues like border security and immigration too. While I voted for him twice, it's been five years since 9/11 and he hasn't done anything of substance to secure the borders (other than ride around in a dune buggy for a Michael Dukakis dune buggy shot.
26
posted on
08/22/2006 9:10:38 PM PDT
by
BW2221
To: doug from upland
Who the heck is Tom Fitton?
27
posted on
08/22/2006 9:12:22 PM PDT
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: jrooney
Sheeesh.
This is what happens when you get arrogance and stupidity rolled into one.
It didn't even occur to them that this connection would easily be discovered?
Unbelievable.
28
posted on
08/22/2006 9:12:39 PM PDT
by
Solemar
("Frognostication": The science of predicting the exact date and time that France will surrender.)
To: motife
Surprise! Surprise!! The NY Slimes has actually published an article on this: http://tinyurl.com/ezx4f
Let us see if the TV channels (other than Fox) even cover this blatantly unethical behavior.
29
posted on
08/22/2006 9:21:06 PM PDT
by
indcons
(Islam Delenda Est)
To: BW2221
Things are being done on the borders. Maybe not as much as the likes of crazy Buchanon would like. It is a sticky situation politically and I for one do not want to be a member of the minority party for a very long time for alienating most hispanics.
We can build a big wall, put in cameras and deport all illegals, then be voted out of office because statistically we need the hispanic vote to maintain our majority. Once out of office for 4, 8, 12 years or maybe longer, the donks will pass many laws we hate, appoint US Supreme court justices like Ginsburg, fill up the federal courts, raise our taxes and attempt to change our social values nationwide. There is a bigger picture out there for me and my family in the long run.
Things need to be done on immigration, please do not get me wrong and they are slowly getting there.
The main thing is WE HAVE NOT BEEN ATTACKED AGAIN, and that is not by pure luck.
30
posted on
08/22/2006 9:23:41 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: motife
Paging the U. S. Attorney General...
31
posted on
08/22/2006 9:24:19 PM PDT
by
zot
(GWB -- the most slandered man of this decade)
To: doug from upland
And then disbarred, tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail.
To: Solemar
I think it is the arrogant mindset of liberals. They think we common people are too stupid to catch on to their agenda, and they need to supervise us and lead us by the hand.
Over the last 40 years or so they have been getting away with things like this. Until recently they have had full run of the field to get away with their radical agendas. Times are a changing and there is not much of a future for liberals in the coming horizon.
33
posted on
08/22/2006 9:27:57 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: doug from upland
Of course it is a conflict of interest. She should be impeached.
Ain't gonna happen with the limpd##ks in the senate.
34
posted on
08/22/2006 9:28:50 PM PDT
by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!)
To: jrooney
"Actually president Bush just said that yesterday. "
Do you mean that Bush mentioned this conflict of interest yesterday? I miss something?
And what mouth-breather at the NSA missed THIS connection before trial?
OR.....
[donning tinfoil hat]
NSA knew the conflict existed, but was unsure about what the outcome might be, so permitted the case to proceed with this obviously conflicted judge in order to attack the ruling when they lost.
[/removing tin foil hat]
35
posted on
08/22/2006 9:30:36 PM PDT
by
Solemar
("Frognostication": The science of predicting the exact date and time that France will surrender.)
To: motife
She should be thrown off the bench for this.
36
posted on
08/22/2006 9:31:00 PM PDT
by
EternalHope
(Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
To: Solemar
I agree with your removing the tin foil hat. Good catch BTW. GW just said yesterday he disagreed with the ruling, it was wrong and would be appealled. He was not pleased with the judge. Sounded like a rebuke to me.
37
posted on
08/22/2006 9:33:09 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: phoenix0468
Judicial Watch, which was mentioned in the story. He wants to line his pockets with more suckers' money.
38
posted on
08/22/2006 9:34:25 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: motife
39
posted on
08/22/2006 9:36:13 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: doug from upland
40
posted on
08/22/2006 9:37:13 PM PDT
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson