Skip to comments.
Evolution Major Vanishes From Approved Federal List
New York Times ^
| August 24, 2006
| Cornelia Dean
Posted on 08/23/2006 11:09:23 PM PDT by balch3
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-207 last
To: js1138
Cryptic? ... Okay, I'll leave you alone.
201
posted on
09/20/2006 9:35:32 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: balch3
it's pretty sad that someone would actually major in a theory that has major flaws; although the believers of evolution just won't see or admitt to those flaws. For example; clear transitional fossils showing a slow transformation of one life form into another as so many of the illustrations in textbooks show. They simply don't exist. Many scientists who once believed TOE have seen this fact and do not believe it any longer.
202
posted on
09/20/2006 9:46:00 PM PDT
by
fabian
To: MHGinTN
Why must I provide evidence? I was only addressing the impossibility of abiogenesis as defined. I personally choose to believe there is therefore a designer.
You claimed that a "designer" is an "obvious, default conclusion". You are incorrect. The only default conclusion available when no credible explanation can be constructied based upon available evidence is that the explanation is unknown.
203
posted on
09/21/2006 5:44:12 AM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: fabian
For example; clear transitional fossils showing a slow transformation of one life form into another as so many of the illustrations in textbooks show. They simply don't exist.
What, then, are
these? Also, are you under the mistaken impression that fossil remains are the only evidence used to support the theory of evolution?
204
posted on
09/21/2006 5:46:38 AM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: driftdiver
I agree with you...there is so much that many scientists believe to be true but is merely speculation supported by what they honestly believe to be evidence. But to an objective student the evidence is lacking in the evolution theory. If it wasn't the case, many reputable creation scientists would be forced to believe TOE.
205
posted on
09/21/2006 7:28:34 PM PDT
by
fabian
To: Dimensio
those honestly are speculation...they don't clearly show the morphing of one type of animal into another. And the site you provided doesn't show any photos.
206
posted on
09/21/2006 7:40:36 PM PDT
by
fabian
To: fabian
.they don't clearly show the morphing of one type of animal into another.
How would you expect this to appear?
207
posted on
09/21/2006 7:42:47 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-207 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson