Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JONES URGES PRESIDENT TO INITIATE REVIEW OF CASE AGAINST U.S. BORDER PATROL AGENTS
Walter B. Jones ^ | August 21, 2006 | Walter B. Jones

Posted on 08/23/2006 11:20:51 PM PDT by beaversmom

Washington, D.C. – In a letter today to President George W. Bush, Third District Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC) expressed deep concern over the Justice Department’s unacceptable prosecution of two U.S. Border Patrol agents for simply doing their jobs to protect our homeland.

“Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean should have been commended by our government for their actions last year in attempting to apprehend a Mexican drug smuggler who brought nearly 800 pounds of marijuana across our border,” Jones wrote. “But because of an incomprehensible prosecution by the U.S. Attorney’s Office – including granting full immunity to the smuggler so he could testify against our agents – these men now face 20-year prison sentences for firing shots at the fleeing smuggler, who they believed carried a gun. The smuggler – who received complete medical care at William Beaumont Army Medical Center in El Paso, Texas – is now suing the Border Patrol for $5 million for violating his civil rights!”

“The Justice Department’s outrageous prosecution does nothing but tie the hands of our Border Patrol and prevent them from securing America against a flood of illegal immigrants, drugs, counterfeit goods and quite possibly, terrorists,” Jones continued. “This demoralizing prosecution puts the rights of illegal alien drug smugglers ahead of our homeland security and undermines the critical mission of better enforcing current immigration laws. These two agents should not be made scapegoats for our government’s enforcement failures.”

“I am pleased that the House Judiciary Committee has recognized the need for a thorough review of this case by calling for Congressional hearings and an investigation of the Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and the U.S. Attorney’s Office,” Jones wrote. “In the meantime, I strongly urge your Administration and the Department of Justice to reopen the case against agents Ramos and Compean.”

“Mr. President, please assure the American people that those who commit crimes in our country will not be protected by the federal government,” Jones concluded.

For additional information or to schedule an interview with Congressman Walter B. Jones please contact Kathleen Joyce at (202) 225-3415.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Colorado; US: New Mexico; US: North Carolina; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; borderpatrol; compean; congress; drugsmugglers; gramsci; illegalaliens; mexico; pardon; presidentbush; ramos; rino; walterjones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: beaversmom

Thanks for the ping!


21 posted on 08/24/2006 7:03:35 AM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: howard345

From what I understand the agents did not report the shooting to their superiors, which is obviously something that might deserve an admin. reprimand or something like that but not this nonsense. I do believe there's another curious element involved which is the assistance another BP agent by the name of ( I think) Sanchez gave the smuggler (boyhood friend) with medical and legal assistance which no doubt included an audience with the fedgov prosecutors who ended up giving the smuggler IMMUNITY!.

Lou Dobbs has been all over this issue and it's looking more and more as though the drug czars have so much power in that area that this action is being pursued to send a clear message to other BP agents to in effect.... "don't ask, don't tell".....


22 posted on 08/24/2006 7:46:17 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
thanks for the ping.

These two agents should not be made scapegoats for our government’s enforcement failures.

Summed up precisely. I've heard one of the BP agents and their wife on the radio. They were very appreciative of all the letters, emails, and faxes of support they have been getting. I thought it was extremely considerate of them to mention it after the hell they've been through. They said they were feeling very isolated, alone, and abandoned - until the outpouring of concern and outrage from all across the country.
23 posted on 08/24/2006 8:01:05 AM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

>"Mr. President, please assure the American people that those who committ crimes in our country will not be protected by the Federal government." Jones concluded.<

Thank you for the ping. Any word that Mr. P. has responded to this letter? Unless something has been left out of the story, this is another nail in our coffin, and he has the hammer.


24 posted on 08/24/2006 9:39:34 AM PDT by Paperdoll (.........on the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

If it was Clinton, the two border agents would be facing life in prison without parole, and civil suits.

Also, the smugglers family would be allowed in and would be given $$$ and citizenship by the US.


25 posted on 08/24/2006 1:33:47 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

All that's missing from that pic of GWB in front of the Mexican flag is a 666 on GWB's forehead. GWB is nothing but an NWO sellout. Neo-cons are not true conservatives.


26 posted on 08/24/2006 2:00:52 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Thanks for the ping. Infuriating travesty and perversion of justice.

'Woe unto them that call good evil, and evil good.'


27 posted on 08/24/2006 5:01:47 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
I can't imagine a jury of American citizens actually voting to convict these two border patrol agents.

It's time for our Mexico-loving President to step up to the plate for America and make his voice heard. His silence has been deafening on border control matters, and Americans are beyond angry at him and his open borders cronies in the Senate and the House (and of course the Attorney General).

28 posted on 08/24/2006 5:24:41 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance; janetgreen

The relationship through marriage between the smuggler and two involved government agents must be investigated, and the circumstances leading to a jury convicting.

Is that jury anywhere near the standards of "peers" or did the DA run roughshod over the PD's preferences?

Was the judge somehow biased (political appointee or party hack)?

Did that judge allow suppression of information or evidence that would have led to a fair hearing - possibly even abusing their powers to insure the Prosecutor had an overwhelming advantage (like a jury made up of people possessing the barest grasp of English and a will to "stick it" to the Border Patrol)?


29 posted on 08/24/2006 6:23:48 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (Progress; not progressiveness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus
Very important questions that must be answered, NRT.

Congressman Jones' contact web address is:

http://jones.house.gov/html/contact.cfm

30 posted on 08/24/2006 7:05:07 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Thanks, but it really bugs me sometimes that the general population is so befuddled that they don't see these slaps to their intelligence when it's so obvious that they're being played for suckers. The danger here (IMO) is allowing a foothold in legal precedence allowing much greater abuse in the future.

These two good but overly-trusting agents must be saved lest the other dedicated Border Patrol regard the whole game as fixed and give in to the Mexican standard. That would mean 'Game Over' and render all enforcement a cruel and expensive joke.
31 posted on 08/24/2006 8:27:04 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus
I understand that there are many border patrol agents who are absolutely disgusted with the current Bush administration practice of what amounts to a revolving door at the border, rendering their efforts as useless.

Can't say I blame them. You're right, this incident unfortunately will set the standard for even more Mexican rule at the border, and it's obvious that this is exactly what Washington wants.

We have elected twice a president who is owned by corporate interests, is oblivious to what the American people want, and forces us to finance his destructive policies.

I voted for him once only, and will always regret that vote.

32 posted on 08/24/2006 10:01:35 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
The smuggler – who received complete medical care at William Beaumont Army Medical Center in El Paso, Texas – is now suing the Border Patrol for $5 million for violating his civil rights!”

What freaking 'civil rights'?!!!

33 posted on 08/24/2006 10:07:28 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

He's got rights too you know. Pathetic, isn't it?


34 posted on 08/24/2006 10:09:29 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom; GOPPachyderm; All

Note to self and others: GOPPachyderm would like to be on any ping lists about Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean.


35 posted on 08/25/2006 12:53:08 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen

You indicate you regret your vote for GWB. So the alternative was preferable?

He's not perfect but thank God we don't have to say President Kerry - at least yet.


36 posted on 08/25/2006 2:38:05 PM PDT by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GOPPachyderm
So the alternative was preferable?

No, I didn't vote for Kerry. The choice between Bush and Kerry was so putrid that I felt that I had no choice, and voted third party.

37 posted on 08/25/2006 6:57:12 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen

Thanks for your reply. I'm sorry you don't share my admiration of President Bush. I feel he's done a pretty good job in most areas, although I want to see reparations to these two border patrol agents.


38 posted on 08/26/2006 6:57:20 PM PDT by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

bump for more eyes


39 posted on 08/26/2006 7:01:29 PM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson