Skip to comments.Ahmadinejad: Those Who Want Good Relations W/ Iran Should Bow & Surrender
Posted on 08/24/2006 5:00:30 AM PDT by SJackson
The following are excerpts from a speech delivered by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which aired on Iranian News Channel (IRINN) on August 15, 2006. *Clip # 1241 - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: The U.S and England Are Not Worthy of Security Council Membership. Those Who Want Good Relations with the Iranian People Should Bow and Surrender to its Might
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: When they talk about a "New Middle East," they mean a Middle East that is held captive by America, England, and the Zionist regime. When they talk about a "New Middle East," they do not mean progress, development, independence, or freedom for the countries [of the region]. They oppose independence, freedom, and progress. Look at Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, and other places. I say to them: The peoples of the region have awakened. It so happens that our peoples are also calling for a New Middle East. The Middle East that our peoples want is a free Middle East, which is not under the control of America and England.
Those who were involved in planning this barbaric attack, those who supported this barbaric attack, and those who prevented the ceasefire are accomplices in the crimes of the Zionist regime, and must be placed on trial. To be more specific, America and England purport to support human rights, freedom, and democracy. When a cat's leg is run over by a municipal vehicle in some city, they hold a mourning ceremony. But they had the audacity to postpone the ceasefire for at least three weeks. They explicitly declared that the Zionist regime should be allowed to crush the resistance, and to occupy the land, and that [only] then would there be a cease-fire. I want to declare loud and clear, so that the whole world will hear: These two countries are not worthy of being members of the Security Council.
If you want to have good relations with the Iranian people in the future, you should acknowledge the right and the might of the Iranian people, and you should bow and surrender to the might of the Iranian people. If you do not accept this, the Iranian people will force you to bow and surrender.
TO VIEW THIS CLIP: www.memritv.org/search.asp?ACT=S9&P1=1241
********************** For assistance, please contact MEMRI TV Project at firstname.lastname@example.org The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.
MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.
MEMRI TV Project P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837 Phone: (202) 955-9070 Fax: (202) 955-9077 www.memritv.org
Great read very good read
Ahmadinejad's Straight Talk Express speaks again.
Well we don't want good relations. So how 'bout we just strike and bomb?
I am picturing liberals everywhere falling to their knees.....
This is SOP for the Muslim jihadis. They are required by the Koran to give the infidels a warning to convert or they will die. Somehow I don't think the UN is up to coping with this, but then, neither is our State Department.
nah that would be too mean lol
As Charles K. said on Special Report last night .... it has been a bad week at the State Department.
So, what would you say the over/under is for the number of "Kneel before Zod" references there are in the replies to this thread?
Can't somebody take out this little creep?
I'd love to meet this guy and give him a big Liverpool kiss.
Viva le... Iran?
Those who are Iranian Muzzie Mohammadins a-holes should kiss my fat ass.
I agree with you, I think they already have them and are doing everything they can to provoke an incident. This will provide international cover as they nuke Israel. They better be careful what they wish for, I don't think Americas or Israelis are in any mood for a war to "win hearts and minds." Civilized people will say "enough, wipe 'em out."
First, we need an UN committee to study this response.
Then vote a proper response to this statement.
Then vote again to make sure the first vote was proper.
Send a delegation to Iran to discuss the vote.
Give Iran 90 days to reply.
Extend the reply deadline 60 more days.
Send Irans reply to committee.
Take a vote in committee on the reply.
Send that vote to the UN General Assembly.
Set a date, preferably 90 days in the future, to discuss the committees vote.
Vote on a proper response to the committees decision.
Discuss the vote.
Send the matter to the security concil.
Set a date, preferably 90 days in the future, to discuss the General Assemblies vote.
Discuss the vote.
Vote on a proper response to the General Assembies vote.
Discuss the results, preferably 90 days in the future.
Vote on if a military reponse is proper.
Discuss the vote results 2 weeks in the future.
Then, if the vote is for bombing, ask France for their approval.
IF, France approves, send the matter to the US Congress.
Then we start the same process again, this time in Congress.
Get back to me in 2009, and I'll let you know what we decide...
***The U.S and England Are Not Worthy of Security Council Membership.***
IMO the UN is not a worthy organisation for England and the US to belong to.
We need to give them 60 days to get the hell out of our country and take their Mussie friends with them.
Thanks for the offer, Mahmoud, but we do not accept your offer. It's your move, little man. Make us bow and surrender.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.