Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

911 And Katrina: Disastrous Experiments In Liberalism
Red States USA ^ | 8/25/2006 | Christopher G. Adamo

Posted on 08/25/2006 6:40:25 AM PDT by SFCGeraldRTostensen

In the next few weeks, two very notable dates will be observed. August 29 marks the one-year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina’s devastation of New Orleans. Less than two weeks following that will be the fifth anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Liberals are already engaging in an enormous amount of reflection. And they plan to do much more, but only if they can completely control the manner in which America recalls the original events. If they are successful, Republicans could take a major hit from the memorial.

But in truth, rather than run from the recollection of either incident, Republicans ought to loudly trumpet both in their true context, as grim reminders of the tragedy that can occur when America becomes too distracted from real dangers, whether natural or man-made, that it will regularly and inevitably face.

Neither situation could be characterized as totally unexpected. Rather, consistent warnings were voiced for years, and even decades, that such calamities would likely eventuate, and that the nation could best cope with situations of their nature by properly preparing in advance.

And in neither case was any such preparation made. The real root causes were those that resulted from the misguided devotion of liberal America to its agenda, which invariably benefits the liberal leadership at the expense of everyone else.

Furthermore, in both cases, all of the post-mortem “soul searching” has itself revealed that those chiefly responsible remain totally unrepentant, and are absolutely unwilling to rectify any contributing lapses, even if their obstinacy means leaving the nation highly susceptible to a recurrence.

Particularly in regards to 9-11, the recent exposure of a massive terrorist plot in England clearly indicates that the perpetrators of the 2001 attacks are indeed planning more strikes that would eclipse even the horrendous death and mayhem of that awful day. Yet liberal/Democrat finger pointing seems far more motivated by the anticipated fallout in the upcoming elections than by any concern for the safety of the American people.

Nor should the nation be anything but outraged at such transparent, politically motivated efforts as the so-called “9-11 Commission.” America cannot afford to be less than forthright in its efforts to determine and correct the grave security lapses that left it vulnerable to the plotting of the terrorists. Here again, another, far more sinister purpose drove certain of the commission’s members.

For starters, it was hopelessly tainted by the dubious participation of Clinton crony Jamie Gorelick, who quickly proved that her entire purpose was to deflect culpability from where it truly belonged, which was with the philandering and bungling actions of the Clinton Administration.

Throughout the 1990’s, the storm clouds of Islamism gathered, with occasional terrorist acts being mounted against the United States. Yet during that entire period, Bill Clinton’s main reaction to the looming threat was to determine how best to “spin” it for political gain. In retrospect, this will be the grim reality of his “legacy.”

Thoroughly politicized though it may have been, as the commission proceeded in its work, it became apparent that the threats to America had not materialized overnight, and therefore could not be blamed on the fledgling Bush Administration or its new Attorney General, John Ashcroft.

Yet the effort was made to affix just such blame. As a result Ashcroft himself was called to testify. But rather than accepting the premise of his attackers and becoming defensive, he bluntly pointed to panel member Gorelick as the chief culprit in the bungling of intelligence. And no amount of criminal destruction of evidence by Sandy Berger will ever erase that truth.

Likewise, the Katrina fiasco ensued as a byproduct of previous and long standing bureaucratic corruption and incompetence, perpetrated with complete disregard for the very widely accepted knowledge that a large storm would eventually strike New Orleans.

In truth, the storm brought no surprises, except that during the time which should have been devoted to preparation, the New Orleans government misdirected funds and indulged itself in every luxury except that of shoring up its levees and infrastructure.

As a consistent liberal, New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin steadfastly refuses to take responsibility for the fiasco that ensued. Instead, to this day he still makes excuses and blames others, even to the point of invoking the absolutely predictable “race card.” So nothing has changed. Sadly, owing to the willingness of that city’s residents to reelect Nagin, nothing will change.

Instead of righting such wrongs, the entirety of the supposed “fix” is as it always has been, demands for enormous sums of money with no accountability. After months of corruption and scandalous misuse of emergency funds in the wake of the hurricane, it is glaringly obvious that New Orleans needs more such “aid” about as much as it needed more school buses. The problem prior to the storm was not financial, and it is not financial now.

Contrary to the media hype that has already commenced, and will undoubtedly continue as long as the left believes it can garner any political gain from either situation, Republicans have good reason to directly face them. Together, they showcase the real results reaped from a shortsighted and self-serving approach to problems.

Despite all of their phony tears, “commiserating” political hacks on the left never intended to fix or address those problems either before or after thousands of Americans lost their lives. Rather, they remain determined to empower themselves, ultimately at the expense of those whose interests they are sworn to serve. And if they regain their majorities in Congress this November, the nation can only expect more of the same.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; hezbocrats; liberals; sorocrats
...tainted by the dubious participation of Clinton crony Jamie Gorelick, who quickly proved that her entire purpose was to deflect culpability from where it truly belonged...

Very few "intelligent" Americans could disagree.

1 posted on 08/25/2006 6:40:26 AM PDT by SFCGeraldRTostensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SFCGeraldRTostensen
This article carries an important message. Thank you for NOT excerpting this article.
2 posted on 08/25/2006 6:50:46 AM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SFCGeraldRTostensen
But in truth, rather than run from the recollection of either incident, Republicans ought to loudly trumpet both in their true context, as grim reminders of the tragedy that can occur when America becomes too distracted from real dangers, whether natural or man-made, that it will regularly and inevitably face.

Neither situation could be characterized as totally unexpected. Rather, consistent warnings were voiced for years, and even decades, that such calamities would likely eventuate, and that the nation could best cope with situations of their nature by properly preparing in advance.

If he thinks that a good heart-to-heart between some FEMA big-shots and the fine folks at CBS will manifest itself in a 60 Minutes special entitled "Katrina: Clinton's Disastrous Miscalculations", he's dreaming.

3 posted on 08/25/2006 6:55:48 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SFCGeraldRTostensen
Conservatives must go on the offensive now. They should have gone on offense in 2001, but I digress. The author is dead on with this analysis. The hopelessly lost leftist agenda got us 9-11 and blocked any attempts to reinforce the protective structures around N.O. (why we have a city under sea level is another story). The dismantling/hampering of counter-terror intelligence assets blocked our ability to assess threats like terrorism and Iran. Did not Congress just make a mention of that?? The MSM and left, of course, blames Bush, but sane people know this happened long before, back when we were told terrorism was a "legal issue"

In the 90s, idiotic, naive leftists indicted Bin Laden, declared victory and waved the indictment stating "peace in our time". Bin Laden, who does not CARE (or is it CAIR) what Western lawyers say or do, laughed his rear off and went to play with is goatfriend while he continued preparing multiple terror attacks, culminating in 9-11. Thanks leftists.... Thanks for NOTHING!!!

Here is another example of Nagin's nagging:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/24/60minutes/main1933092.shtml

When I looked at the FEMA website after 9-11, it specifically stated: Be prepared to survive at least 3 days as it will take time for help to mobilize and get through the destruction to you. This seems common sense... Maybe that says it all..

And here it is:
http://www.fema.gov/plan/index.shtm
And the exact quote:
http://www.fema.gov/areyouready/why_prepare.shtm
"If a disaster occurs in your community, local government and disaster-relief organizations will try to help you, but you need to be ready as well. Local responders may not be able to reach you immediately, or they may need to focus their efforts elsewhere."
"You should also be ready to be self-sufficient for at least three days. This may mean providing for your own shelter, first aid, food, water, and sanitation."

Did the left just laugh off "bug out bags", preparedness, and common sense? Or did they simply think "someone else will take care of me". Another tragedy of the welfare state mentality.

There it is, from the 2004 FEMA handbook. Here's a hint for the trolls: be prepared to survive 2 WEEKS (the time it takes uranium based fallout to dissipate). Have a bug out plan, shelter options, stored food and water. Have plans for protection from those "misunderstood" criminals you pamper. Don't live in an area easily destroyed by nature. And leftists, for once in your lives, take responsibility and accountability for yourselves and your actions (or lack there of)!!! How difficult is that??!!??
4 posted on 08/25/2006 7:14:59 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Thank you for NOT excerpting this article.

By excerpting, could you possibly mean the comment to which I commented upon?

5 posted on 08/25/2006 7:31:35 AM PDT by SFCGeraldRTostensen (Everybody's got to believe in something. I believe i'll have another beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SFCGeraldRTostensen
By excerpting, could you possibly mean the comment to which I commented upon?

I don't think so. I was referring, in a left handed way, to lazy FReepers who excerpt articles that are NOT on the must excerpt list.

Way too much of that going on around here.

6 posted on 08/25/2006 8:02:41 AM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Molly Pitcher

Ping!


7 posted on 08/25/2006 8:16:57 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

dont forget all the katrina
fraud...



Some examples cited by The New York Times illustrate the wide-ranging nature of the corruption:


An estimated 1,100 prison inmates across the Gulf Coast collected in excess of $10 million in rental assistance and disaster-relief money. Crime pays! FEMA, in addition, distributed millions of tax dollars to people who used names and Social Security numbers belonging to state and federal prisoners.

A hotel owner in Sugar Land, Texas, has been charged with submitting $232,000 in invoices for evacuees who allegedly never stayed at his hotel, billing FEMA for purportedly empty rooms or rooms occupied by paying guests or hotel employees.

An Illinois woman who was living in Illinois at the time of the storm sought relief benefits by claiming she had watched her two daughters drown in the flood waters of New Orleans. The children never existed.

A Department of Labor employee in Louisiana, appropriately named Wayne Lawless, has been charged with handing out nearly 100 falsified disaster unemployment benefit cards in exchange for kickbacks of up to $300 per card.

In New Orleans, two FEMA officials have pleaded guilty to pocketing $20,000 in bribes in exchange for inflating the count on the number of meals a contractor was serving to relief workers.

With the $2,000 debit cards distributed by FEMA for disaster relief, an estimated 5,000 people have double dipped, receiving both the $2,000 plastic card and a second $2,000 by check or electronically.

Two men, one a representative of the Army Corps of Engineers, have pleaded guilty to taking kickbacks in exchange for approving payments for removal of nonexistent loads of hurricane debris. In contrast, with loads of debris that were not nonexistent, a councilman in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, has been charged with attempting to extort $100,000 from a debris-removal contractor.

One creative scam artist is charged with collecting 26 federal disaster relief checks totaling $139,000 by using 13 Social Security numbers and fake claims of damage at bogus addresses. Others collected and pocketed hurricane relief donations by posing as Red Cross workers.
All told, what the above represents is "one of the most extraordinary displays of scams, schemes and stupefying bureaucratic bungles in modern history," reports the Times, "costing taxpayers up to $2 billion."

The $2 billion guesstimate might well prove to be just the proverbial tip of the iceberg. Commenting on the extent of fraud and waste in FEMA's response to Katrina, Gregory D. Kutz, a director of audits at the General Accounting Office, stated, "I still don't think they fully understand the depth of the problem."

By the time the Katrina accounting is over, it won't be surprising if the fraud and boondoggles hit $5 billion. The question: How high does the price of ineptitude and corruption have to go before we all begin to understand the depth of the problem?


8 posted on 08/25/2006 8:35:38 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Great. Thanks!

Liberalism...the "You never have to say you're sorry" syndrome...

9 posted on 08/25/2006 10:25:21 AM PDT by Molly Pitcher (We are Americans...the sons and daughters of liberty...*.from FReeper the Real fifi*))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SFCGeraldRTostensen

In truth, the storm brought no surprises, except that during the time which should have been devoted to preparation, the New Orleans government misdirected funds and indulged itself in every luxury except that of shoring up its levees and infrastructure.



I would like to see an investigative report that identifies all of the money that was allocated to improving the New Orleans Levies (Federal, State, City, and Parrish, including Army Corps of Engineers and their contractors) for the past 20 or so years ... and where it actually went ... and what could have been done with that money.

Seems to me that the Democrats were in charge, failed, and have not been, aren't being, and won't be held accountable for their failure.


10 posted on 08/25/2006 2:16:41 PM PDT by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
And I thought the corruption in the Arab world was bad.... There you at least know that 20% of the contract is for bribes. That is just how the Middle East does business.
11 posted on 08/25/2006 2:37:16 PM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson