Posted on 08/25/2006 9:53:42 AM PDT by BJClinton
Ever since I announced my bid for the United States Presidency, I’ve been questioned about some of my more radical political opinions. Most of those questions have dealt with my proposed economic policies – for example, the abolition of the IRS and the implementation of the Fair Tax. Today, I offer an answer to questions about why I am opposed to the idea of gays adopting or teaching children.
Several years ago, I began writing columns questioning the so-called gay rights movement. I prefer to call it the “gay privileges” movement because gays are not presently deprived of anything that is rightfully theirs. A gay man has the same right I have to marry a woman. His waiver of that actual right does not allow him to substitute another “right” he deems more suitable to his needs.
At the time I decided to express such criticism of the gay agenda, I was not fully opposed to gay adoption. Nor was I absolutely opposed to hiring gay grammar school teachers. My criticism of the gay agenda was narrower than it is today and the tone of my criticism was far more subdued. That all changed when the homosexual rights crowd started to circulate some of my early columns.
Frequently, the criticism would come en masse from gay groups who would post my columns on PRIDE websites or chat rooms at universities like UNC-Greensboro, which is also known as UNC-Gonorrhea. They would work themselves into a fury over my well-reasoned essays and then respond with a flurry of obscenities unfit for reproduction in this column.
Before long, readers identifying themselves as “gay” were threatening to cut off my genitalia, burn my children, rape my wife, and, just to top it all off, kill me, too. Good thing these readers were all “gay.” Otherwise, they might not be so happy.
So, of course, I took the time to survey a number of other conservative columnists to find out where most of their profane and threatening hate mail comes from. The answer is always the same: Without hesitation, they all say it comes from the “gay” community.
Despite the volume and intensity of this gay vitriol, I have always refused to reciprocate with threats of violence or strings of profanity. Instead, I have relied on the far more powerful tool of heavy sarcasm. And that refusal to respond with profanity or violence has had a predictable effect on the gay activists. It has made them much less gay (less happy, that is) and also much more active.
One of their more recent stunts was to get together on a gay website to hatch a plan to destroy my marriage. Actually, they started their plan on one of the Transgendered websites. Since the Transgendered people are so angry, I suppose they are technically classified as “gay,” too.
The first step of their plan to destroy my marriage was to concoct a false story that I once committed adultery. For the record, I have never cheated on my wife. I did, however, attempt to cheat on my wife one time. Unfortunately, I couldn’t get past Ms. Coulter’s bodyguard.
| 1 | 2 |
|
| | Full Article & Comments | | | Next > |
You'd think it was commons sense NOT to have homos as role models or near kids. GEESH!
Adams is great. His further point that there is nothing wrong with discriminating against people with a mental illness is right on. Crazy people can (perhaps) hold a lot of different jobs. Teaching children is not one of them.
Does anyone have a cite to the 11th Distric Court opinion regarding upholding the ban on homosexuals adopting children?
Hmmm,
Should schools be LEGALLY REQUIRED to disclose if their child is being exposed to homosexuals?
Who is this that has announced their bid for the U.S. Presidency?
Almost the same thing happened to me...fortunately, Ann's bodyguard stopped her from getting too close, while I told her, "sorry Ann...I can't accept your offers. Stay in touch, though...we can still be friends."
I have been reading Mike Adams for a couple of years...he is great!
...And now you realize why I am opposed to gays adopting or teaching our children.
Umm... because some of them made foul threats against you? Because they used to be considered mentally ill?
If I wrote essays opposing Judaism, or stating that black people should not be allowed to adopt white children, or that women aren't fit to serve on juries, I would most likely get some pretty vicious hate mail from Jewish, black and female readers, respectively. That wouldn't prove much, even though various authorities have stated in the past that Jews are evil, blacks are violent and women are hysterical.
You'll have to come up with a better argument than "because I've succeeded in pissing them off".
While what you said is technically correct, you're equivocating a religion, ethnicity and gender with where one wants to stick their willie. Hardly the same.
No.. you're using a fallacy of logic. His point had nothing to do with the level of mutability of the attributes involved. It also had nothing to do with whether being gay is just an "unhealthy fault."
His point was that the author makes no real arguments in favor of his position, except "because I've succeeded in pissing them off."
Whether or not you agree with his arguments, you can still call him on his stunted writing and juvenile reasoning.
For clarity.. in my first and second paragraphs the pronoun "his" refers to xenophiles, in the third it refers to the author of the column.
UNC-Greensboro is very gay. Literally something like 50% of the male students are homosexual.
However, if you're a straight young man, you can be ugly and dumb and still have a harem, since 70% of the student population is female. Even after accounting for lesbians, you've got about 4:1 odds. I used to know a smoking hot young lady from my hometown who went there who always complained about not having a boyfriend.
Freepmail DBeers, little jeremiah or scripter to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
No.. you're using a fallacy of logic. His point had nothing to do with the level of mutability of the attributes involved. It also had nothing to do with whether being gay is just an "unhealthy fault."
His point was that the author makes no real arguments in favor of his position, except "because I've succeeded in pissing them off."
Whether or not you agree with his arguments, you can still call him on his stunted writing and juvenile reasoning.
I grew up in Key West...undoubtedly, I was taught by some gay people. Gay people babysat me. In fact, as I got older, I socialized with gay people, and considered these same gay people my friends.
I doubt that you have ever met a gay person.
And people wonder why FReepers are considered right-wing wackos....
Answer: Because they are Queer...
Ooops! You didn't get the memo? The best targets are those you never actually see. It's simply enough to just have a vague concept.
I doubt that you have ever met a gay person.
And people wonder why FReepers are considered right-wing wackos....
LOL
Ooops! You didn't get the memo? The best targets are those you never actually see. It's simply enough to just have a vague concept.
People should get to live the way they want and where they want. I'm all for that.
Did you know that all black people are theives, too? Anymore ridiculous stereotypes?
What the hell is wrong with those Scots being so cheap. Dang, they're as cheap as the Irish are drunk.
Well, according to Mel Gibson, its all the Jew's fault.
People should get to live the way they want and where they want. I'm all for that.
I have one! Actually, you have one.
Many of the founders were evil and they were trial lawyers.
:^}
The deal seems to be that gay communities (with few exceptions) exist in large metropolitan areas. The vast majority of people outside of these areas have little or no contact on a daily basis with gay people other than watching re-runs of Will & Grace.
Blaming it on the Jews is so passe...
One of my tennis partners was a flaming gay.My straight friends used to tease me about him all the time but he respected my preferences and it was all cool.
Jerome was a walking encyclopedia of old music and we had lots of fun quizzing each other on Sixties songs.He also was a dynamite tennis player.
If I had said,"He's a FAG,I don't want to be seen with HIM",it really would have been MY loss.
Oh yes, you are right....I've never had such a discussion with any of my gay friends...
Did you know that all black people are theives, too? Anymore ridiculous stereotypes?
NO,its all the GAY Jews'fault!
I grew up in Key West...undoubtedly, I was taught by some gay people. Gay people babysat me. In fact, as I got older, I socialized with gay people, and considered these same gay people my friends.
Gay people and conchs...is there such a thing as a gay conch?
What the hell is wrong with those Scots being so cheap. Dang, they're as cheap as the Irish are drunk.
The deal seems to be that gay communities (with few exceptions) exist in large metropolitan areas. The vast majority of people outside of these areas have little or no contact on a daily basis with gay people other than watching re-runs of Will & Grace.
As Americans, our view of national stereotypes is unique.
There is a brilliant scene in one of those tom clancy movies. Brad Pitt and Harrison Ford are playing pool in some suburban bar and the patrons start throwing around national stereotypes. The Brad Pitt character, who is Irish, tenses and waits for violence. All the second, third and four generation Americans laugh it off. A very subtle scene, but it relates a lot.
How does race equate to sexual deviants? I understand the ploy is useful to normalize a mental disturbance, nevertheless, it is still a transparent ploy.
Humans are a sexually dimorphic species, the survival of which depends on the natural attraction between men and women. What is so difficult about figuring out the obvious and ignoring the deviants argument for accepting such mental disturbances?
On the homoped issue: stats show that well over 50% of male homosexuals are in fact homopeds. Have you heard, they have an international organization called NAMBLA? I lived in the Gay, I mean Bay area, south of san Fransicko for 6 years. The practice of homopedia is rampant and has been for several decades. And, as I have stated before, this is nothing new, the Roman male homosexuals bought and sold catamites (young boys) many centuries ago. This is part of the lifestyle folks. Don't expect male homos to talk about it in normal company. They have yet to come out of the closet with this one.
As Americans, our view of national stereotypes is unique.
There is a brilliant scene in one of those tom clancy movies. Brad Pitt and Harrison Ford are playing pool in some suburban bar and the patrons start throwing around national stereotypes. The Brad Pitt character, who is Irish, tenses and waits for violence. All the second, third and four generation Americans laugh it off. A very subtle scene, but it relates a lot.
This practice is hardly confined to gay men...c'mon, now...
Ahhh, you know the real facts from experience.... not what someone said you should think.
Exactly on point.
I've said this before, but it needs repeating.
Walk into any large restaurant or bar in any large city and you'll see the grandchildren and great grandchildren of guys who would have been at each other's throats in a murderous rage less than a century ago. And, oddly, their descendants aren't in a murderous rage. They are simply enjoying each other's company.
That's really the genius of America. And, I believe, at least part of why some backward societies hate us.
Using that practice as the essential defining point of "who I am" is confined to gay men.
Any normal person would consider such self-definition to be a sign of mental illness.
Again, you go with race verses someone wanting to stick their penis where fecies gets dumped. Face it...that is the bottom line with gay men.
This practice is hardly confined to gay men...c'mon, now...
I've said this before, but it needs repeating.
Walk into any large restaurant or bar in any large city and you'll see the grandchildren and great grandchildren of guys who would have been at each other's throats in a murderous rage less than a century ago. And, oddly, their descendants aren't in a murderous rage. They are simply enjoying each other's company.
That's really the genius of America. And, I believe, at least part of why some backward societies hate us.
This practice is hardly confined to gay men
Using that practice as the essential defining point of "who I am" is confined to gay men.
Any normal person would consider such self-definition to be a sign of mental illness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.