Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Californians Now Recycle Half of Their Trash (Today trash,Tomorrow,Politicians! California Dreamin')
LA Times ^ | 8/25/06 | Amanda Covarrubias

Posted on 08/25/2006 10:24:14 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

State officials announced Thursday that California has finally achieved its goal of reducing landfill waste by 50%, thanks to diligent recycling by residents and businesses.

The milestone culminates a 16-year campaign by the state to persuade people to separate recyclables out of the trash.

The state passed a landmark law in 1989 mandating that communities establish waste-management plans for residents and businesses that would ultimately divert at least 50% of all recyclable trash from landfills. California was supposed to reach the goal in 2000, but preliminary data released Thursday show that the goal wasn't reached until last year.

A total of 88 million tons of solid waste was recycled in 2005 for a 52% recycling rate, said Jon Myers, a spokesman for the state's Integrated Waste Management Board. In 2004, 76 million tons were recycled, or 48%.

Though some cities still lag behind, other communities that are now diverting 60% or more of their waste to recycling centers made up the difference.

Myers said the recycling push has achieved one of the intended effects: No new landfills have opened in California in a decade.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; californians; landfills; recycle; trash

1 posted on 08/25/2006 10:24:15 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Good Job, California!

I gave up the battle with my spouse and family and what is for tossed in what, I just toss as much in the recycle as I can when I can.


2 posted on 08/25/2006 10:25:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Myers said the recycling push has achieved one of the intended effects: No new landfills have opened in California in a decade.

So will this guy credit energy conservation for the fact that nobody's building power plants?

3 posted on 08/25/2006 10:26:46 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Pluto's been marginalized! Call the ACLU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The other half they put in movies as stars...........


4 posted on 08/25/2006 10:29:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I don't recycle anything,except the cardboard and junk mail I burn in my garage barrel stove....I won't recycle anything else until the City removes the recycling charge from my utility bill.


5 posted on 08/25/2006 10:36:43 AM PDT by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

No mention is made of the fact that landfill owners are always finding new ways to make the garbage decompose faster, thus landfills never uh ... fill up.


6 posted on 08/25/2006 10:51:30 AM PDT by ROTB (Our Constitution ... only for a moral and religious people... -- John Q. Adams, October 11, 1798)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Recycling will make sense when they start paying ME, for my garbage.


7 posted on 08/25/2006 10:52:24 AM PDT by rock58seg (A minority of Republican RINO's are making a lot of Republicans look like fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Newspapers are a huge environmental hazard. They consume millions of trees, which must be cut down using oil, gas, and diesel fuel. Then the trees have to be trucked and processed into paper, using more energy and polluting the air. Then the paper has to be trucked to the newspapers, who use still more energy printing millions of pages every day. Then the newspapers are delivered, using still more energy and polluting the air. Then the discarded papers have to be picked up by garbage or recycle trucks, using still more energy and polluting the air.
Congress should pass legislation limiting the size of newspapers to 10 pages a day. This would help save the world from global warming.


8 posted on 08/25/2006 10:57:57 AM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I didn't see any thing about what it cost the good citizens to do this. Here in northeast Indiana it cost on the order of $10 per month for the privilege of giving our trash to a recycler who sends most of it to a landfill.........
9 posted on 08/25/2006 11:11:45 AM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

LOL....very good!


10 posted on 08/25/2006 11:22:21 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I don't. It goes in whatever colored can has space. If they want to pick through my family's dirty diapers to find an aluminum soda can, they are welcome to. I don't have the time, or the inclination to wallow in my trash.
11 posted on 08/25/2006 11:25:34 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
My wife and her family have made a small fortune in the recycling business. It was started in the 1920's by her grandfather (Tin cans and Rags) today they employ over 200 people and recycle Paper, plastic, metal, glass, construction waste, you name it. The place is a wonder, and all built on other people unwanted trash.
12 posted on 08/25/2006 11:32:59 AM PDT by MrNeutron1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrNeutron1962

Aside from metal, do they have a profitable market for the other products w/out govt subsidies?


13 posted on 08/25/2006 11:37:49 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
By recycling their trash, they are just referring to the politicians they keep moving from one office to another. Phil Angelides for instance. Villaragoisa. Burton. Etc. Etc.

The sad part is the california citizens have to pay extra to have their waste recycled because the state (and cities) PAY recycling centers to take the waste. The recycling centers then SELL the waste to wholesales or recycle it themselves and then SELL the recycled materials to manufacturers! Only in California can the state take an assets and turn it into a money losing exercise.

14 posted on 08/25/2006 11:50:22 AM PDT by bpjam (Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Recycle ping!


15 posted on 08/25/2006 11:51:20 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1689967/posts?page=11#11


16 posted on 08/25/2006 11:54:33 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Unlike when we were in Santa Clarita, where we were "told" to bundle or bag newspapers and then had three other recycle bins (glass, plastic and metal) - out here in the desert we just have the one can where it all gets tossed, and is sorted elsewhere.

I don't mind that, except for the fact that there's another collection truck that leaks it's hydraulics out front every week.

I must say, though, that the recycle can is two thirds or more full each week, where the regular trash container is well under a quarter.

17 posted on 08/25/2006 11:56:32 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

World record ping response time!


18 posted on 08/25/2006 11:57:40 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ROTB
No mention is made of the fact that landfill owners are always finding new ways to make the garbage decompose faster, thus landfills never uh ... fill up. PLEASE!!! link me with SOME kind of information on how they do this!
19 posted on 08/25/2006 12:00:02 PM PDT by Toby06 (The 'Holier than thou" types who call women sluts and whores are just pure psuedo-Christian trash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So, how much money did it cost for this accomplishment? They never tell you that.


20 posted on 08/25/2006 12:01:21 PM PDT by HannagansBride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

"Aside from metal, do they have a profitable market for the other products w/out govt subsidies?"

Most of it winds up in the landfill because the recycling centers can't sell the trash.

I won't buy recycled paper products, they are poor quality and cost more than fresh stock plus it costs more to recycle than making it from trees. Most of the trees used in paper are waste product from mills and trees that aren't sutible for lumber to start with.


21 posted on 08/25/2006 12:06:20 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

in a word, "Rubbish!"

They have no idea how much actual recycling is taking place.
These reports are based upon the grossest manipulation of unreliable statistics and bureaucratic estimates.

The reality is they have browbeat a majority of businesses and homes into participating in "recycling". The ratio of recycled to disposed residential waste in my county is about 25/75 based upon what is left at curbside each week.

The ability of the average household to actually classify waste between the different containers is unmeasured and probably fairly low.


22 posted on 08/25/2006 12:11:27 PM PDT by Gail Wynand (Power is only proportionate when it is sufficient to overcome the aggressor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Seems like in Dallas, many just use the roadside.


23 posted on 08/25/2006 12:15:47 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Wish I could find the link to that recycling vanity of mine from a couple of years ago where all the enviro-Freepers came unglued at me.
24 posted on 08/25/2006 12:27:24 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MrNeutron1962
My wife and her family have made a small fortune in the recycling business. It was started in the 1920's by her grandfather (Tin cans and Rags) today they employ over 200 people and recycle Paper, plastic, metal, glass, construction waste, you name it. The place is a wonder, and all built on other people unwanted trash.

Fantastic. I love capitalist opportunities. It's when government orders me to provide free labor to assist your wife's business that I object.

25 posted on 08/25/2006 12:31:08 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

Just google for "landfill" and "shortage". The last paragraph of the first link is:



We not only have vastly larger landfills, we are not only putting less in them, we also use them more efficiently. A given amount of landfill space will hold about 30 percent more content today than in the past.

Waste companies and municipalities, says the Times are "burying trash more tightly, so that each ton takes up less space, increasingly using giant 59-ton compacting machines guided by global positioning systems that show the operator when he has rolled over a section of the dump enough times. They cover trash at the end of the day, to keep it from blowing away, with tarps or foam or lawn clippings instead of the thick layers of soil that formerly ate up dump capacity." (See: Rumors of a Shortage of Dump Space Were Greatly Exaggerated, August 12, 2005)

The EPA is surely welcome to publish its charts and diagrams, but how about some context? Why not plainly tell the public how consolidation, technology and recovery have changed landfill economics -- and that landfill capacity has increased while the amount of stuff we place in landfills has declined?


26 posted on 08/25/2006 1:27:26 PM PDT by ROTB (Our Constitution ... only for a moral and religious people... -- John Q. Adams, October 11, 1798)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

You claimed they get stuff to decompose more quickly. Nothing you wrote describes that.

I am a civil engineer, and would be very interested in how they get stuff to decompose more quickly during the filling operation, where it would make a difference.


27 posted on 08/25/2006 1:46:20 PM PDT by Toby06 (The 'Holier than thou" types who call women sluts and whores are just pure psuedo-Christian trash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

Google for "landfill decomposition acceleration OR accelerated", and start digging.


I'm out of work, so if you'd like a research assistant, and pay well, let me know. Seriously.


28 posted on 08/25/2006 4:13:06 PM PDT by ROTB (Our Constitution ... only for a moral and religious people... -- John Q. Adams, October 11, 1798)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Minnesoootan

hear, hear


29 posted on 09/18/2006 10:37:38 AM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson