Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Frigate Intercepts Drug Smugglers, Helps Rescue 26
American Forces Press Service ^

Posted on 08/27/2006 12:52:44 PM PDT by SandRat

NAPLES, Italy, Aug. 27, 2006 – U.S. Navy frigate USS Boone intercepted a drug-smuggling speedboat Aug. 24 while enroute from Algeria to Spain during a patrol of the Mediterranean Sea south of the Spanish coastline. According to U.S. Navy 6th Fleet officials, the crew abandoned its cargo—five packages of marijuana weighing 90 kilograms--when the USS Boone was sighted and entered Algerian territorial water. The Boone’s crew confiscated the marijuana.

A few hours later, near the same location, the USS Boone encountered two small rubber boats in apparent distress, officials said. The ship approached the boats and found 26 people on board. A Spanish Coast Guard vessel intervened to assist and rescued all 26 passengers, taking them ashore.

The USS Boone is part of the Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 and is currently participating in Operation Active Endeavor. The allied component maritime commander, Vice Admiral Roberto Cesaretti, who is responsible for the operation, sent his congratulations to the crew via the military code “Bravo Zulo” and stressed the importance of the operation.

Operation Active Endeavor is NATO's maritime contribution to the fight against terrorism. Launched in October 2001, it continues to conduct surveillance and monitoring operations of the major shipping lanes in the Mediterranean.

(From a U.S. European Command news release.)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 26; drug; frigate; helps; intercepts; italy; navy; rescue; smugglers; us; wodlist

1 posted on 08/27/2006 12:52:44 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...

BRAVO ZULU NAVY!


2 posted on 08/27/2006 12:54:02 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Why is the Navy doing police work? For Spain?


3 posted on 08/27/2006 1:12:30 PM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
BRAVO SIERRA, NAVY!

I agree that this is another abuse of our tax dollars. I can see W loving it!

4 posted on 08/27/2006 1:16:13 PM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke

That sppedboat could have been smuggling arms and explosives, perhaps even cash. As for the boats in distress, that's between you and your conscience.


5 posted on 08/27/2006 1:22:32 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke; pageonetoo

Think it through. This is an announcment for smugglers of all types, including terrorists, that we're out there and we're willing to take action, even when it's not "our problem."

It was the right thing to do, unless you're one of those who want to climb into a hole and pull in the sod over our heads.

You can't hide from this stuff.


6 posted on 08/27/2006 1:23:13 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
That sppedboat could have been smuggling arms and explosives, perhaps even cash.

Nothing wrong with US personnel doing liaison work with Spanish authorities. But Navy ships aren't Spanish (or American) police vehicles.

7 posted on 08/27/2006 1:42:33 PM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
You can't hide from this stuff.

When the Spanish potheads come after me, I'll post an apology. /sarc

8 posted on 08/27/2006 2:06:48 PM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

NATO has had a standing naval force for 50 years or more, and a U.S. ship has almost always been part of it. It's usually a six month deployment and command of the force rotates among the NATO countries. My ship did a spell with what as then called STANDNAVFORLANT back around 1980 and we had a Dane as commodore. While a part of it USS Boone does what the force is assigned to do, and if it's to stop smugglers in the Mediterranean then that's it.


9 posted on 08/27/2006 2:14:40 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke

When Al Qaeda smuggles a nuke into your town via the "Spanish pot heads" supplier you won't have the chance to post an apology.

Worse, if they were to smuggle one into my town I won't have the chance to tell you what a fool you were.

No sarcasm there at all. Just simple facts.

If you don't see that then you don't see anything.


10 posted on 08/27/2006 2:19:23 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
11 posted on 08/27/2006 2:23:53 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Why did they keep the dope?


12 posted on 08/27/2006 2:41:41 PM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke
Operation Active Endeavor is NATO's maritime contribution to the fight against terrorism. Launched in October 2001, it continues to conduct surveillance and monitoring operations of the major shipping lanes in the Mediterranean.

Sounds like it's within their orders to me.

13 posted on 08/27/2006 2:42:45 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

"abuse"

Excuse me .. you'd rather the drug smugglers were successful ..?? Not me!


14 posted on 08/27/2006 2:48:20 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke
Why did they keep the dope?

Well, I guess that pretty much summarizes your agenda, doesn't it? 

15 posted on 08/27/2006 2:54:35 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Excuse me .. you'd rather the drug smugglers were successful ..?? Not me!

Excuse me, but I didn't think our borders had been expanded so far... or are you one of the Globalists among us?

Since when are we supposed to be baby-sitting for other countries? I can think of a few better places if you wanted to affect American citizens drug use. I can also think of a lot better things for a fighting force to be doing with fighting going on in the world!

16 posted on 08/27/2006 2:57:31 PM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Sounds like it's within their orders to me.

When they confiscated the dope, they went past legit NATO business into civilian police work. If that is what is expected from our armed forces, I find it troubling.

17 posted on 08/27/2006 3:13:08 PM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke
When they confiscated the dope, they went past legit NATO business into civilian police work. If that is what is expected from our armed forces, I find it troubling.

Your stash running low...?

Hey for once the Coast Guard doesn't get first pick.

They have a legit right to stop and search suspicious vessels.

If they start dumping contriband, well that's the smuggler's blues ain't it?

18 posted on 08/27/2006 3:22:48 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

We're part of NATO and it's a NATO mission to secure the sea lanes in the Med. That's why the Boone was there, not some "globalist expansion of our borders" strawman you offer up.


19 posted on 08/27/2006 3:24:39 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
Excuse me, but I didn't think our borders had been expanded so far.

Yes, Thomas Jefferson was really out of line on that one.

20 posted on 08/27/2006 3:32:27 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
We're part of NATO and it's a NATO mission to secure the sea lanes in the Med. That's why the Boone was there, not some "globalist expansion of our borders" strawman you offer up.

Thanks for the response. Which foundational document (DecofInd, Const., Articles of Cofederacy?) calls for us to patrol overseas sea lanes for the benefit of foreign entities. I understand treaties. I understand alliances. I understand the borders of the United States, though our Presient doesn't seem to care about defending them.

What am I missing? I know I am probaly wrong, but I just thought we had things to take care of at home! There is no benefit for us to sit around poppoing drup smugglers in the Med, when Iran, N.Koea, etal are ready to see us dead!

It would be nice to have Our Navy used for us!

21 posted on 08/27/2006 3:43:24 PM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
You must be some kind of druggie!

And probably the kind of druggie who would object if the Chinese navy boarded your boat and confiscated stuff they thought was illegal (Bibles, unmonitored computers, histories of the cultural revolution, ...).

/sarc

22 posted on 08/27/2006 3:55:17 PM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke
...And probably the kind of druggie who would object if the Chinese navy boarded your boat

Hopefully, as an American citizen, I can find a US Navy vessel to help me, unless they are all overseas. I only sail the coast of North Carolina. I cruise a lot, though, and expect them to take care of me there, as well! That is their job, unless I am wrong.

23 posted on 08/27/2006 4:20:44 PM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke

The Navy is looking for arms smugglers and terrorists. Drug smugglers present the same profile. Gonna get them too.


24 posted on 08/27/2006 5:46:27 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke
Why is the Navy doing police work? For Spain?

Apparently, the concept of showing our flag while transiting international/navigable waters is lost upon you.

25 posted on 08/27/2006 5:48:47 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
THe USS Boone is an Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV) not a Frigate.
26 posted on 08/27/2006 7:54:52 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Here to Help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Somebody at AFPS messed that up then.


27 posted on 08/27/2006 9:04:24 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

You must be kidding. DRUGS ARE GLOBAL .. so we must fight them globally. You can't ignore them just because it's not happening within the USA's borders .. that's ignorant!


28 posted on 08/27/2006 9:31:25 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

It's a Frigate. Oliver Hazard Perry (FFG-7) class. Same as the USS Stark.


29 posted on 08/28/2006 12:58:12 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

I have many friends on the Boone, and I can tell you for a fact that it is a frigate. frigate # 28 to be exact, and they were on their way to Spain when they ran into the boats, they weren't purposely seeking out drug vessels. They are in the Med. to keep the waters clean of terrorists. Which as many of you said they should be doing.


30 posted on 08/28/2006 1:45:07 PM PDT by latfsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
There is no benefit for us to sit around poppoing drup smugglers...

I hate it when my drup smugglers get poppoed.

31 posted on 08/28/2006 1:48:56 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (I've had it with these &%#@* jihadis on these &%#@* planes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
On the contrary. The USS Boone (FFG-28) is indeed a guided missile frigate of the Perry class and not an Offshore Patrol Vessel (whatever that is).

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

32 posted on 08/28/2006 2:05:43 PM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm; Doctor Raoul; latfsu
On the contrary. The USS Boone (FFG-28) is indeed a guided missile frigate of the Perry class and not an Offshore Patrol Vessel (whatever that is).

Heg to differ.

USS Boone Completes SRAThe most visible was the removal of the Mk 13 Guided Missile Launcher and Separate Track Illumination Radar (STIR). This class-wide modification will remove the SM-1 capability from all FFG-7 class ships.
What do you call a guided missile frigate that has no capacity to launch guided missiles?

Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV)

An offshore patrol vessel (OPV) is large and seaworthy enough to patrol off-shore, in the open ocean.
....
OPVs are usually equipped with some kind of gun, but they lack extensive weapon systems. They are primarily used for patrol in the exclusive economic zone, and common tasks are fishery inspection and search and rescue (police-type of work). The largest OPVs might also have a hangar and helicopter embarked.


33 posted on 08/28/2006 9:17:01 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Make peace with your Ann whatever you conceive Her to be -- Hairy Thunderer or Cosmic Muffin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

You were correct..


34 posted on 08/28/2006 9:35:35 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy; hosepipe
Vendemiaire (F734)
The French frigate Ven
demiaire http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Vendemiaire_%28F734%29

I call it a Frigate, the French call your own example a Frigate (F734), but you guys are correct.

What color is the sky on your planet?

35 posted on 08/29/2006 7:33:55 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=frigate

It used to be that Frigates were LARGER than Destroyers (50s, 60s) but that has been reversed in recent decades.

Note the definition says "frequently" armed with an AAW system.

36 posted on 08/29/2006 7:38:49 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Your Dutch Frigate here.
37 posted on 08/29/2006 7:45:37 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: latfsu

Welcome to FR.


38 posted on 08/29/2006 7:47:16 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul; hosepipe
1. General Dictionaries, when not totally wrong on naval terminology, are always 20 to 200 years out of date.

From your dictionary source

[Origin: 1575–85; < MF frégate < It fregata, Sicilian fragata (> Sp, Catalan, Pg); of obscure orig.]
These origianl frigates were small oared or light sailing vessels, no more than despatch poats.

In the early 17th Century the term was applied to the swift privateer vessels that operated out od Dunkirk and Oestend (perfidious French!)

Other maratime nations then built ships modelleded after the Dunkirkers and the term pased into general naval usage

When the Line of battle formatiom was introduced diring the Anglo-Dutch wars. the Royal Navy Fighting Instrictionms of 1665 ordered the less powerful units out of the line and ordereded them to take station }on the broadside of the Admiral way from the enemy'.

ergo the classical frigate: a ship rigged warship, not intended to fight as part of the battle-fleet.

That frigate disappeared in the late 19th century, replaced by the cruisinhg ship.

It used to be that Frigates were LARGER than Destroyers (50s, 60s)

2. Only in America. Thre rest of the world pretty much decided on a ocean going vessel less combat capoable that a destroyer.

With destroyers now the largest vessels designed for surface combat, that moves the definition close to the original one.

Note the definition says "frequently" armed with an AAW system.

3. Here the dictionary dead wrong, trying to accomodate the anomolus US "Frigates" os the 69s and 60s.

What does seem to be developing is a concensus (still with many exceptions) that a destroyer carries an area defence AAW system: otherwise surface combatants are frigates.

the French call your own example a Frigate (F734), but you guys are correct.

Huh. What wouls the cheese eating surrender monkeys know about what is required to class a ship as combat capable?

20 years ago thet were calling the Georges Leygues "corvettes", now they are "destroyers". Yet they are frigate sixed, frigate armed - directly comparable to what the majority of navies call frigates.

They also call the 1200 tone D'Estienne D'Orves class, with very limited self protection capability, "frigates".

http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/europe/france.htm

Minor Surface Combatants
Floreal class small patrol frigates
Displacement: 2,950 tons full load
Dimensions: 93.5 x 14 x 4.3 meters (307 x 46 x 14 feet)
Propulsion: 4 diesels, 2 shafts, 8,800 bhp, 20 knots
Crew: 80
Aviation: Aft helicopter deck and hangar for 1 Panther helicopter
Troops: 24 special forcesRadar: DRBV 25 air/surface search EW: ARBR 17 intercept, 2 Dagaie decoy
Armament: 2 Exocet SSM, 1 100 mm DP, 2 20 mm
Low-cost patrol vessels for overseas service, fisheries patrol, etc. Built to commercial standards.

Thetis class - your source
The Thetis class are multi-role frigates for fishery protection, surveillance, air-sea rescue, anti-pollution and ice reconnaissance.
....The armament consists of one Oto Melara 76mm Super Rapid main gun, one or two 20mm guns from Oerlikon and depth charge throwers.

Whatever they are called, like the present US Perrys, the limited arnament makes them Offshore Patrol Vessels in reality. Us guys am correct.
39 posted on 08/29/2006 7:01:09 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Here to Help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
The Thetis class are multi-role frigates....

You can't even support your own arguement.

40 posted on 08/29/2006 8:05:45 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
What wouls the cheese eating surrender monkeys know about what is required to class a ship as combat capable?

Who'd cite them as an expert?

41 posted on 08/29/2006 8:07:59 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

The Perry class frigates with the Mk13 removed is often referred to as a "gelded Perry". Granted, the SM-1MR has been out of production, with questions about the propellant grain as the weapon ages. All that is left on the current Perry class is a 76mm automatic mount, room for two Seahawk helicopters, and maybe still a pair of Mk32 triple torpedo tubes. It does leave it as an effective ASW platform, maybe better than the predecessor Know class FF's. Still, no area air defense, just makes it an OPV + ASW capability.

There was being considered replacing the Mk 13 launcher (with mechanical loading) with an 8-cell Mk 41 VLS, with 32 rounds of the Enhanced Sea Sparrow Missile, however that may have required a change in radars. The ESSM has a range comparable with the SM1MR.


42 posted on 08/29/2006 8:20:20 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
You can't even support your own arguement.

My argument is that the frigate is the basic surface combatant of most navies.To be combat capable an actual frigate must be have either
1. Some offensive capability

2. Combat survivability. Today that means ship defence SAM (Sea Sparrow. Seawolf, SAN-4, Cotrale, Barak) and missile defence (either CIWS or good decoy system. preferably both)

A nominal "Frigate" with a 3" gun and a couple of manual 20mm doesn't meet the standard.

43 posted on 08/29/2006 8:42:31 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Here to help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
There was being considered replacing the Mk 13 launcher (with mechanical loading) with an 8-cell Mk 41 VLS, with 32 rounds of the Enhanced Sea Sparrow Missile,

Actually you can have both (and SM-2 too)


44 posted on 08/29/2006 9:25:58 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Here to help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
I picked two of your OPV examples at random and found that their own Navy's call them Frigates.

When you OWN a Frigate, you can call it waht you want, but tioll then, I'll stick to reality.

45 posted on 08/30/2006 6:46:17 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson