Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cancer cell 'executioner' found ~ synthetic molecule which caused cancer cells to self-destruct.
BBC ^ | Sunday, 27 August 2006, 23:51 GMT 00:51 UK | BBC staff

Posted on 08/27/2006 8:20:10 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Cancer cell 'executioner' found

Cancer cells dividing - copyright Steve Gschmeissner/SPL

Cancer cells keep dividing because the cell suicide process fails

Scientists have developed a way of "executing" cancer cells.

Healthy cells have a built-in process which means they commit suicide if something is wrong, a process which fails in cancer cells.

The University of Illinois team created a synthetic molecule which caused cancer cells to self-destruct.

Cancer experts said the study, in Nature Chemical Biology, offered "exciting possibilities" for new ways of treating the disease.

These findings present an exciting new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of some cancers

Dr Michael Olsen, Cancer Research UK

One of the hallmarks of cancer cells is their resistance to the body's cell suicide signals, which allow them to survive and develop into tumours.

All cells contain a protein called procaspase-3, which the body should be able to turn into caspase-3 - an executioner enzyme.

But this transformation does not happen in cancer cells, even though certain types, such as colon cancer, leukaemia, skin and liver cancers paradoxically have very high levels of procaspase-3.

Healthy cells unaffected

The researchers examined more than 20,000 structurally different synthetic compounds to see if any could trigger procaspase-3 to develop into caspase-3.

They found the molecule PAC-1 did trigger the transformation, and cancer cells from mice and from human tumours could be prompted to self-destruct - a process called apoptosis.

The more procaspase-3 a cancer cell had, the less of the molecule was needed.

Healthy cells, such as white blood cells, were found to be significantly less affected by the addition of PAC-1 because they had much lower levels of procaspase-3, so cell-suicide could not be triggered.

When the scientists tested PAC-1 on cancerous and non-cancerous tissue from the same person, the tumour cells were 2,000-fold more sensitive to PAC-1.

Since different levels of procaspase-3 were found in the cell lines studied, the researchers suggest some patients would be more responsive to this therapy than others, so the it might one day be possible to tailor treatments to individual patients.

'Exciting'

Professor Paul Hergenrother, who led the research, said: "This is the first in what could be a host of organic compounds with the ability to directly activate executioner enzymes.

"The potential effectiveness of compounds such as PAC-1 could be predicted in advance, and patients could be selected for treatment based on the amount of procaspase-3 found in their tumour cells."

Cancer Research UK expert Dr Michael Olson, who is based at the Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, said: "These findings present an exciting new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of some cancers.

"It remains to be seen which, if any tumour types consistently express elevated procaspase-3. That will tell us how many patients could potentially benefit from the drug.

"Clinical trials will be needed to confirm whether procaspase-3 causes any adverse effects in humans."



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: cancer; cancercells; thisisbig
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-139 next last

1 posted on 08/27/2006 8:20:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Wow...


2 posted on 08/27/2006 8:23:03 PM PDT by Crazieman (The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; Howlin; Mo1; onyx; Brad's Gramma

Man this would be some good news if this progresses....the money should flow for this research....


3 posted on 08/27/2006 8:23:22 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It seems like I read frequently that some new something-or-other has been discovered which cures/reverses cancer, and then I never hear of it again. This is the second time I've seen an article about this, so maybe there's something to it.


4 posted on 08/27/2006 8:23:35 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic ■Št gehate, ■Št ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille fur­or gan,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

BTTT


5 posted on 08/27/2006 8:26:02 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Smoke em if you got em!


6 posted on 08/27/2006 8:28:29 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
the money should flow for this research....

This is the sort of research all that 'anti-tobacco jihad' money should have been spent on all along.

Cure the disease.

7 posted on 08/27/2006 8:29:52 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
There was a company that was promising at one time that had isolated a portion of aspirin that seemed to hold promise to cause apoptosis of the cancer cells...some of this may have been built on some of that work...

Company's name was Cell Pathways...I think....

Googling :

Cell Pathways scientists describe mechanism by which SAANDS compounds trigger programmed death in cancerous and precancerous cells

*************************************AN EXCERPT **********************************

New drug target for inducing apoptosis in abnormal cells published in Cancer Research

HORSHAM, PA (July 5, 2000) -- Scientists at Cell Pathways, Inc. (Nasdaq: CLPA) and their collaborators have identified a new drug target that may play a key role in cancer cell survival. Exisulind (Aptosyn™) and other compounds in the company's family of selective apoptotic antineoplastic drugs (SAANDs) inhibit this target, cyclic GMP phosphodiesterases of the PDE5 and PDE2 gene families that have been found to be over-expressed in cancerous and precancerous cells of the colon. The inhibition of these target proteins triggers a chain of events which results in the programmed cell death, or apoptosis, of cancerous and precancerous cells, but not normal ones. The drugs have additionally been shown to inhibit the growth of a broad variety of malignant tumor cells beyond colon tumors, in both cell culture and animal models of human cancers.

The new research appears in the July 1 issue of the journal Cancer Research. Cell Pathways scientists and their collaborators at the University of South Alabama College of Medicine, and the University of Colorado authored the paper.

Apoptosis and SAANDs

Apoptosis is the body's response to a normal, orderly sequence of biochemical or physical signals by which damaged or "worn out" cells are eliminated to make way for healthy, new cells. When the mechanism of apoptosis goes awry, cells continue to multiply and grow inappropriately, forming a mass of tissue -- a cancerous tumor. In colon cancer, excessive cell growth occurs as the result of the accumulation of a regulatory protein, beta-catenin, caused by mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene.

The researchers showed that exisulind and other SAANDs induce apoptosis in colon tumor cells by inhibiting the different forms of cGMP PDE in these cell lines. This results in a sustained increase in cGMP in the cells and the induction of cGMP-dependent protein kinase G (PKG). This rise in PKG activity causes beta-catenin to be degraded in neoplastic cells, thus triggering cell death by apoptosis through well-studied mechanisms. In addition, SAANDs that are better inhibitors of PDE5 and PDE2 than exisulind also show parallel increases in ability to induce

8 posted on 08/27/2006 8:30:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

See post #8.


9 posted on 08/27/2006 8:31:27 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

wow .... that's medical articles bookmarked today. Did you see the one on using your own adult stem cells to rejuvenate heart tissue?


10 posted on 08/27/2006 8:43:55 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Property taxe is feudalism. Income taxation is armed robbery of the minority by the majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
This is the sort of research all that 'anti-tobacco jihad' money should have been spent on all along. Cure the disease.

That sounds just like the AIDS crowd.

11 posted on 08/27/2006 8:44:06 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
That sounds just like the AIDS crowd.

How so?

Cancer was around before tobacco use, and will continue to be around if you could make all tobacco dissappear today, this instant.

Cure the disease, and everyone benefits, tobacco user or not.

This ain't bungholing, it's an F'n cigarette. SHeesh!

Or would you argue a few billion more dollars should be pissed down the endless computer model research rathole to tell us all cigarettes are bad for you?

12 posted on 08/27/2006 8:56:05 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
"That sounds just like the AIDS crowd."

I wonder if gay men are addicted to sex like smokers can't stop puffing. Needle-drug users are certainly gonzo from reality.

Anyway, it took generations before people knew about smoking hazards. AIDS was identified in a very short time by comparison. Practically nobody after the late 1980s can blame anyone but themselves if they've acquired it.

That is sad, tragic, and stupid.

13 posted on 08/27/2006 8:59:37 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Clinical trials will be needed to confirm whether procaspase-3 causes any adverse effects in humans

More old humans will live longer, putting additional strains on Social Security and the planet's resources? < / sarcasm >
14 posted on 08/27/2006 9:01:31 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Actually the same can be said of those who started smoking, probably since the '70s.


15 posted on 08/27/2006 9:02:10 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Great!! Hopefully this is a giant step forward in ending cancer.


16 posted on 08/27/2006 9:05:52 PM PDT by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

God bless.


17 posted on 08/27/2006 9:07:18 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (John Bolton for Secretary of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

This sounds like one tremendously promising approach to killing cancerous cells!


18 posted on 08/27/2006 9:15:03 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Cancer was around before tobacco use, and will continue to be around if you could make all tobacco dissappear today, this instant.

Cure the disease, and everyone benefits, tobacco user or not.

Then there was no need to bring up tobacco.

The AIDS crowd didn't want to change their behavior, they wanted a cure instead.

19 posted on 08/27/2006 9:20:22 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Sadly your sarcasm is a reality in the world of the government..hence why this will probably not see the light of day.


20 posted on 08/27/2006 9:21:52 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache ("Scientology is dangerous stuff,it's like forming a religion based around Johnny Quest and Haji.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
I've seen very similar claims about food supplements like curcumin, CLA and folic acid. For years there's been the belief that broccoli helps prevent cancer. There's also a whole bunch of antioxidants that may do the same.
21 posted on 08/27/2006 9:23:11 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks. Great post.


22 posted on 08/27/2006 9:26:41 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
If it doesn't see the light of day it will be because there are problems when it's used in the body, rather than a lab dish.

Still there is great hope in medical research these days, even though health care is very expensive and very broken due to government meddling.

23 posted on 08/27/2006 9:27:03 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

I'm not going to go into tremendous detail but the "Cancer Industry" does not want simple solutions, nor do they seek them. I have first hand experience in dealing with these so called doctors and its why I trust lawyers 1000 times more than doctors.

And no, I've never filed a lawsuit.


24 posted on 08/27/2006 9:27:20 PM PDT by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I brought up the fortune expended in the antitobacco jihad which could have been better spent on this type of research in response to another poster's comment about funding this type of anti-cancer research.

You are the one who brought up AIDS, whoch really does not relate to the thread.

It may not bother the rabid antismoker that so much money has been spent for the purpose of attempting to lend scientific creedence to the known fact that cigarettes are bad for you.

After all, warnings have been on the pack since the '60s and the term 'coffin nail' goes back much farther.

I will, however, continue to maintain that that money would be (and would have been) better spent on researching the mechanisms of cancer and stopping the disease, regardless of cause.

25 posted on 08/27/2006 9:31:37 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

A fantastic discovery.


26 posted on 08/27/2006 9:41:40 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They will probably make up a lie as to why it won't work, put it away with all the other cancer cures and continue the multi-billion, multi-national, cancer research industry.


27 posted on 08/27/2006 9:45:08 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
It seems like I read frequently that some new something-or-other has been discovered which cures/reverses cancer, and then I never hear of it again.

TB, before it was cured, "supported" hospitals, sanitariums and careers across the country. It was cured. the careers and hospitals and sanitariums disappeared.

Polio, ditto.

Too much money being made from cancer. I suspicion that until something bigger and worse comes along, it wont be 'cured'

28 posted on 08/27/2006 9:53:17 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: philetus
They will probably make up a lie as to why it won't work, put it away with all the other cancer cures and continue the multi-billion, multi-national, cancer research industry.

a scenario I've lived long enough to see repeated many times. But it keeps the public thinking 'they're working on it! give em more money'

29 posted on 08/27/2006 9:56:59 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; neverdem
PING!
30 posted on 08/27/2006 10:08:49 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Does it work on liberals?


31 posted on 08/27/2006 10:11:48 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
Too much money being made from cancer. I suspicion that until something bigger and worse comes along, it wont be 'cured'.

Sadly, after my experience with cancer (my Dad) and all the research I have done - I must agree. And I'm studying to be a nurse.

As Chris Rock said: "There ain't no money in the cure!"

32 posted on 08/27/2006 10:12:26 PM PDT by blinachka (Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Why do people assume that a possible cure is being hidden, when you would never know about this possible cure if tey hadn't publicized it? With all the competition for new cancer treatments, and the unlikelihood that any breakthrough will truly eliminate all cancers, it is highly unlikely the companies would fail to pursue a promising treatment.


33 posted on 08/27/2006 10:13:16 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Cancer Cure Ping!

I'm all for anything that will help get rid of those stupid anti-tobacco Truth commercials.

34 posted on 08/27/2006 10:18:04 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Of course this will take many years of investigation and will be of no value to anyone living today..........</ Sarcasm>
35 posted on 08/27/2006 10:31:42 PM PDT by itsahoot (The home of the Free, Because of the Brave (Shamelessly stolen from a Marine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blinachka
Sadly, after my experience with cancer (my Dad) and all the research I have done - I must agree. And I'm studying to be a nurse.

My experience with the "Industry" was when my youngest son had bone cancer - I had to do a lot of research, a lot of over-looking and catching mistakes and stepping on delicate doctor's toes - change 'venues' etc - and against all their predictions, my son beat it...after going to hell and back with the treatments...and, against their pronouncements that he'd likely not have children due to the chemo, radiation, etc - he has 3 beautiful children - the oldest 16 now.

36 posted on 08/27/2006 10:34:18 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Why do people assume that a possible cure is being hidden

Because, by publishing this, hope continues to bring in funding dollars to the various projects around the US.

37 posted on 08/27/2006 10:44:34 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

ping for future.
38 posted on 08/27/2006 11:19:55 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

For the last sentence, isn't it a natural part of the body? Why would it have side effects?


39 posted on 08/27/2006 11:21:44 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Some of the BBC articles on diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer's makes it seem as though cancer and Alzheimer's disease have already been eradicated.


40 posted on 08/27/2006 11:23:13 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death

Doctors don't want you to die, but they don't want you to be totally healthy either.

Seems as though every day we have a new killer. Be it restless leg syndrome, dry eyes, acid reflux...

Sick people (even if they're really healthy people who've been conned into thinking they're sick) are doctors bread and butter.


41 posted on 08/27/2006 11:27:20 PM PDT by djf (Some people say we evolved. I say "Some did, some didn't!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

bttt


42 posted on 08/28/2006 2:34:47 AM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

For your ping list.


43 posted on 08/28/2006 2:38:04 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This is very encouraging
more info: http://www.caspases.org/showcitationlist.php?search=PAC-1


44 posted on 08/28/2006 3:57:56 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Good news indeed. Sounds very promising.


45 posted on 08/28/2006 4:00:08 AM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

What's social security? ;)


46 posted on 08/28/2006 4:01:29 AM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Nice finding. But, it appears the study was on one person, who may have one very specific type of cancer. I wouldn't break out the cigars and tell our relatives there's a cure just yet.


47 posted on 08/28/2006 4:51:19 AM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo
What's social security? ;)

What's life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?
48 posted on 08/28/2006 5:28:01 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I wonder how long the American Cancer Society can suppress this research to keep the contributions from falling off?


49 posted on 08/28/2006 5:29:25 AM PDT by Jazzman1 (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Same here. Wonder if this is the same researcher?


50 posted on 08/28/2006 5:31:20 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson