Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Little Ice Age: Big Chill (History Channel's "Inconvenient Truth" About Global Cooling)
History Channel ^ | August 31, 2006

Posted on 08/31/2006 5:13:46 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

Not so long ago, civilization learned that it was no match for just a few degrees drop in temperature. Scientists call it the Little Ice Age--but its impact was anything but small. From 1300 to 1850, a period of cataclysmic cold caused havoc. It froze Viking colonists in Greenland, accelerated the Black Death in Europe, decimated the Spanish Armada, and helped trigger the French Revolution. The Little Ice Age reshaped the world in ways that now seem the stuff of fantasy--New York Harbor froze and people walked from Manhattan to Staten Island, Eskimos sailed kayaks as far south as Scotland, and two feet of snow fell on New England in June and July during "the Year Without a Summer". Could another catastrophic cold snap strike in the 21st century? Leading climatologists offer the latest theories, and scholars and historians recreate the history that could be a glimpse of things to come. Face the cold, hard truth of the past--an era that may be a window to our future.


TOPICS: Unclassified
KEYWORDS: globalcooling; godsgravesglyphs; inconvenienttruth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last
Wait a minute! If we had unusual global cooling in previous centuries, then wouldn't our current "global warming" really be called getting back to normal? Also the promo of this show seems to indicate that we could have another cold snap again. Global Cooling. An Inconvenient Truth for Al Gore.

This show is on the tube right now. Very interesting plus it shows just how dopey Al Gore's "documentary" is.

1 posted on 08/31/2006 5:13:48 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

With 3 weeks of summer left, it was 40 in Boise this morning and 19 in Stanley.


2 posted on 08/31/2006 5:22:01 PM PDT by MarkeyD (The tree of liberty must from time to time be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

That's ok. On one of the "global warming" shows on Discovery or National Geopraphic they talk about rising sea levels from all that melting ice and then a few minutes later they had some Australian geologist talking about some reef creature and he points to an ancient bed on dry land and states that some thousands years back that these were once under water. So apparently sea levels need to rise about 3 - 4 meters to get back over the top of that ancient bed while "scientists" today are concerned over changes in millimeters. Go figure.


3 posted on 08/31/2006 5:24:02 PM PDT by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD

This program is showing how lousy life was when it was cooler. So should we be CELEBRATING that things have warmed up?


4 posted on 08/31/2006 5:24:49 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

It's a good show until the end when they say that man made global warming could bring about another ice age.


5 posted on 08/31/2006 5:25:23 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
The French explorer/navigator Jacques Cartier discovered & navigated a portion of the St. Lawrence River in what is now eastern Quebec in 1534. His observations include writing about grapes growing on vines in the area he explored. Being somewhat familiar with this area of the world it must have been a whole lot warmer in that era than
today ... yet this study indicates it was much colder ... my response: BS!
6 posted on 08/31/2006 5:27:56 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander
...an ancient bed on dry land and states that some thousands years back that these were once under water. So apparently sea levels need to rise about 3 - 4 meters to get back over the top of that ancient bed...

Unless it was continental plate tectonics that pushed it up out of the water.

-PJ

7 posted on 08/31/2006 5:32:44 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

So warming will make us colder????


8 posted on 08/31/2006 5:33:37 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Yeah, that is the conclusion of the show but you won't see it until near the end.


9 posted on 08/31/2006 5:34:46 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix; SunkenCiv; blam

Ping


10 posted on 08/31/2006 5:35:39 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Interesting. I googled this:

In the year ensuing, 19 May, 1535, he began his second voyage with three small vessels, and, steering westward along the coast of Labrador, entered a small bay opposite the island of Anticosti, which he called the bay of St. Lawrence. Ile proceeded cautiously up the river, past the Saguenay and Cape Tour-mente, and anchored off a wooded and vine-clad island ; he called it, on account of the rich clusters of grapes

11 posted on 08/31/2006 5:35:47 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
that is the conclusion of the show but you won't see it until near the end.

That's the traditional place to have a conclusion.

;->

12 posted on 08/31/2006 5:36:52 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

So I can cool down my home by turning on my heaters????


13 posted on 08/31/2006 5:37:33 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

I think grapes also grew in England years ago.


14 posted on 08/31/2006 5:38:36 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
He proceeded cautiously up the river, past the Saguenay and Cape Tour-mente, and anchored off a wooded and vine-clad island ; he called it, on account of the rich clusters of grapes ...

Jacques Cartier also landed and planted a cross at present day Gaspe ... at the eastern tip of the Gaspe Peninsula. He called the waters in the immediate area Le Bai de Chaleur ... translated, the Bay of Warmth, or warm waters.

15 posted on 08/31/2006 5:48:36 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD
Up here in the not-yet-frozen north, we're having highs in the 60s and nighttime lows in the low 40s. Dropping daylight at the rate of 7 minutes a day. I've seen it colder at this time of year, but winter is definitely on the way. Starting to dismantle my flower gardens.
16 posted on 08/31/2006 5:54:01 PM PDT by ArmyTeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD
I love Stanley and all the Sawtooth area. However from many camping trips to Redfish Lake and fishing the streams and lakes nearby, I'd say some "Global Warming" might help Stanley (at least in early September when it always seems to freeze).
17 posted on 08/31/2006 5:59:39 PM PDT by JimSEA ( "The purpose of diplomacy is to prolong a crisis." Spock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

That didn't come out quite the way I planned. LOL!


18 posted on 08/31/2006 6:02:21 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Warming, cooling, we're all gonna die unless we turn over the entire economy to the Ecos' totalitarian ministrations. This is just as much a bid to take over the world as is the Islamic onslaught but this one is Communists.


19 posted on 08/31/2006 6:35:34 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix
Thanks.

I'm watching it for the 3-4 time. I remember my grandparents talking about their parents and grandparents talking about how cold 'it used to be.'

20 posted on 08/31/2006 6:49:56 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.


21 posted on 08/31/2006 6:53:49 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Vines In The UK
22 posted on 08/31/2006 6:54:54 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
I'm watching it for the 3-4 time. I remember my grandparents talking about their parents and grandparents talking about how cold 'it used to be.'

Same here. I remember the old folks talking about it too.

23 posted on 08/31/2006 6:56:57 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Personally, I don't give a hoot about any theories regarding where our climate is going.

A-None of us are going to be around to see any changes.
B-There ain't a damn thing anyone could do about it anyway, even if it is accurate. It is highly unlikely any predictions about what will happen with the climate 150 years from now will be accurate. So what if they are. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.


24 posted on 08/31/2006 6:58:05 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD

First time in at least 4 or 5 mos. I haven't had to open my window at night.


25 posted on 08/31/2006 6:58:55 PM PDT by GOP_Raider (Would you like to join the OFFICIAL Oakland Raiders ping list? Sure you would, send me freepmail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
two feet of snow fell on New England in June and July during "the Year Without a Summer".

That was actually due to the eruption of Tambora in Indonesia.

26 posted on 08/31/2006 6:59:10 PM PDT by dirtboy (This tagline has been photoshopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Didn't the history channel just run a documentary episode about how we will all burn to death in the new global warming world?


27 posted on 08/31/2006 7:00:37 PM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Such a Little Ice Age in northeastern North America and in Western Europe could be caused by a fairly quick (within a decade) shut down of the Gulf Stream -- which has happened before and could be caused by too much meltwater from Greenland. See the following article

The Next Ice Age

or

The Younger Dryas (Little Ice Age)

28 posted on 08/31/2006 7:02:05 PM PDT by Solitar ("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I am taking a college biology class and was looking at the book tonight in class. There was a chart of the average temps since 1900. I noticed that until 1930 the averages was below the long term average.

If the averages started going up in the 1930's there is just one problem with Man's industrial production being the cause. The Great Depression meant much less greenhouse gas production than in the 1920's and World War I.
29 posted on 08/31/2006 9:43:15 PM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
When Samuel Champlain first visited Vermont he wrote:
July 1609

Continuing our course over this lake on the western side, I noticed, while observing the country, some very high mountains on the eastern side, on top of which there was snow.

I can assure you these mountains today never have snow on them even in June much less July.

The Spanish conquistadors also wrote about the cold frosty mornings in Mexico, in the summer.

30 posted on 08/31/2006 9:58:00 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Being somewhat familiar with this area of the world it must have been a whole lot warmer in that era than today

They are growing grapes there now so it does not need to be a lot warmer than today.

31 posted on 08/31/2006 10:02:13 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways
The funny thing is, as recently as the mid to late 1970s the so-called climate "scientists" (in my book not much better than the weathermen at predictions) were raising the alarm that we were headed into another ice age. Not a lot of response to that other than "damn."

Then their tune changed. Global warming could be attributed to man's actions. Something mankind did could be funded, studied, funded, legislated, funded, and studied some more. Hmmm.

And the big bad CO2 levels? What none of the chicken-littles will tell you is that even if mankind stopped all CO2 emissions - a 100% reduction in our output... It would result in a less than 2% drop in CO2 dumped into the atmosphere yearly. Yep, mother nature accounts for 98%+ of the CO2. Between good years and bad years (eg. think volcanoes) human contributions to CO2 are lost in the noise.

Another example of how the climate alarmists are not backed up with real science? Take the melting of the glaciers. Google "How many glaciers in the world" and all you'll get are a bunch of alarmist links about "many" glaciers melting. Yet even though there are literally thousands (over 10K IIRC) of glaciers, less then 200 have been scientifically studied. How in the hell can they call themselves serious scientists and draw such sweeping conclusions when they have such a small sample? I know all about "statistical methods" - math-speak for numbers to lie for you.

I'm not worried about global warming, nor an ice age. I'm worried about being over-run by flaming idiots spouting sensational garbage.

32 posted on 08/31/2006 10:19:22 PM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix
Thanks, Fiddlstix!
The Little Ice Age: How Climate Made History 1300-1850 The Little Ice Age:
How Climate Made History 1300-1850

by Brian M. Fagan
Paperback

33 posted on 08/31/2006 10:24:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Just adding this to the GGG catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

34 posted on 08/31/2006 10:24:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ckilmer; demlosers; ...

· Catastrophism ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark ·

35 posted on 08/31/2006 10:24:58 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Here is the theory: http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0130-11.htm

In quick summary, if enough cold, fresh water coming from the melting polar ice caps and the melting glaciers of Greenland flows into the northern Atlantic, it will shut down the Gulf Stream, which keeps Europe and northeastern North America warm. The worst-case scenario would be a full-blown return of the last ice age - in a period as short as 2 to 3 years from its onset - and the mid-case scenario would be a period like the "little ice age" of a few centuries ago that disrupted worldwide weather patterns leading to extremely harsh winters, droughts, worldwide desertification, crop failures, and wars around the world.


36 posted on 08/31/2006 10:58:24 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I thought it was Krakatoa - but your'e right. Here's added info. i thought the 1991 reference was interesting! (That never seems to come up in the MSM treatment).

The June 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo was global. Slightly cooler than usual temperatures recorded worldwide and the brilliant sunsets and sunrises have been attributed to this eruption that sent fine ash and gases high into the stratosphere, forming a large volcanic cloud that drifted around the world. The sulfur dioxide (SO2) in this cloud -- about 22 million tons -- combined with water to form droplets of sulfuric acid, blocking some of the sunlight from reaching the Earth and thereby cooling temperatures in some regions by as much as 0.5 degrees °C. An eruption the size of Mount Pinatubo could affect the weather for a few years.

A similar phenomenon occurred in April of 1815 with the cataclysmic eruption of Tambora Volcano in Indonesia, the most powerful eruption in recorded history. Tambora's volcanic cloud lowered global temperatures by as much as 3 degrees °C. Even a year after the eruption, most of the northern hemisphere experienced sharply cooler temperatures during the summer months. In parts of Europe and in North America, 1816 was known as "the year without a summer."


37 posted on 08/31/2006 11:13:22 PM PDT by geopyg (If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
They are growing grapes there now so it does not need to be a lot warmer than today.

From 1300 to 1850, a period of cataclysmic cold caused havoc. It froze Viking colonists in Greenland, accelerated the Black Death in Europe, etc., etc ...

The original point in the article is highlighted above ... I'm taking exception to the premise there was a 'mini-ice age' underway at the time. Not so ... at least based on the historical accounts I'm reading.

38 posted on 09/01/2006 6:26:06 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Wait a minute! If we had unusual global cooling in previous centuries, then wouldn't our current "global warming" really be called getting back to normal?

According to the global warming experts there was no little ice age, we have had constant temperatures for over 2000 years prior to 1900. The little ice age is a figment of our imagination. Those poor folks that froze their butts off were really warm.

39 posted on 09/01/2006 6:31:26 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Also, the medieval warm period period never happened either. The expanded agriculture in Greenland and england never happened. Climate has been stable till about 1980, and it got worse in 1994, and got especially bad in 2000-2006
40 posted on 09/01/2006 7:06:03 AM PDT by sachem longrifle (proud member of the fond Du lac band of the Ojibwa people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Wait a minute! If we had unusual global cooling in previous centuries, then wouldn't our current "global warming" really be called getting back to normal?

According to ABC mentioning facts like that are equivalent to denying the Holocaust.

41 posted on 09/01/2006 7:24:59 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Unless it was continental plate tectonics that pushed it up out of the water.

Yes, you would expect that question to be answered by the program and when I asked I got no response from the TV. However, I doubt that would be the case with the Australian plate.

42 posted on 09/01/2006 10:03:39 AM PDT by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Good book, BUMP.


43 posted on 09/01/2006 10:05:23 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

There was a Little Ice Age. Of course, we can only go by the written accounts of how much colder it was, including the accounts of polar bear attacks in Iceland (the bears crossed the frozen Atlantic from Greenland); by the abandoned farmsteads at higher altitudes and higher latitudes than are viable today; by the drop in sealevel after the Medieval Warming period...


44 posted on 09/01/2006 10:16:41 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

And wild grapes survive where cultivated varieties won't.


45 posted on 09/01/2006 10:23:20 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Just another leftist website, which is appropriate, because global warming is political in origin and sustained by politics -- and it has no scientific basis.


46 posted on 09/01/2006 10:24:24 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

During the Roman warming period, grapes were cultivated in Britain. But the Roman cooling came on not too long after its conquest by Claudius.


47 posted on 09/01/2006 10:26:10 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Thanks, I wholeheartedly agree. The weird part is, its author seems to support the New Lysenkoism (that humans are the cause of climate change), but everything in the book says otherwise. That's a consequence of the reaction to one of his previous books, I suppose.


48 posted on 09/01/2006 12:17:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar; Badray

Evil Diesel SUV PING!


49 posted on 09/01/2006 12:53:38 PM PDT by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
That's a consequence of the reaction to one of his previous books, I suppose.

I believe I read that book too, but you are right about the contradictory nature of the author's prior work and commentary vs. Little Ice Age.

My wife picked that book out for me.
I seldom go to the library anymore, she has such a great record for picking out books I will absolutely love.

50 posted on 09/01/2006 12:57:14 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson