Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Byrd Unapologetic About 'Secret Hold' on Spending Bill
Arizona Daily Star ^ | 9-1-06 | Cox News Service

Posted on 09/01/2006 6:17:55 AM PDT by nancyvideo

WASHINGTON — In a new twist in this week's Capitol Hill whodunnit, Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., acknowledged Thursday that he also placed a "secret hold" on legislation that would open up the hidden world of government contracts to public scrutiny. Byrd and Alaska Republican Ted Stevens, two of the most skilled purveyors of federal funds, used the parliamentary maneuver to stop legislation that would create a searchable database of some $2.5 trillion in federal spending.

(Excerpt) Read more at azstarnet.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pork; secrethold; spending; stevens; sunshine

1 posted on 09/01/2006 6:17:56 AM PDT by nancyvideo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo
two of the most skilled purveyors of federal funds,

Geez, can you sugar coat it a little more?

2 posted on 09/01/2006 6:19:08 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (I've had it with these &%#@* jihadis on these &%#@* planes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

LOL! Remember all those threads which predicted it would be Byrd?


3 posted on 09/01/2006 6:19:15 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

A better term might be "Pork Kleagles."


4 posted on 09/01/2006 6:19:45 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

Surprise, surprise, surprise...
5 posted on 09/01/2006 6:20:01 AM PDT by RebelBanker (If you can't do something smart, do something right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

6 posted on 09/01/2006 6:21:27 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic lies/wet dreams posing as news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

Don't you just love it when the parties work together?


7 posted on 09/01/2006 6:21:33 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Is there any thing left in West Virginia to build with federal dollars or name after "Sheets"?
8 posted on 09/01/2006 6:21:52 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

Hey K-K-K-K-Byrd. There's also a Voting Rights amendment up for consideration. Maybe you want to put another *secret* hold on that one too. Jest lyke da olde days.


9 posted on 09/01/2006 6:23:15 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

It would seem the only thing both parties agree on is that big government is a good thing.


10 posted on 09/01/2006 6:23:19 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

You should know better than to put a story like this in Breaking News.

You just knocked "Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread" out of the top ten "Breaking News" stories of this Friday.

Shame on you.


11 posted on 09/01/2006 6:23:52 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

Vote them ALL out!

New blood every time and none of those scumbags like these will rule over America again!


12 posted on 09/01/2006 6:24:30 AM PDT by TimesDomain (When a judge declares himself "MASTER", you become his "SLAVE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
Pork is king in WV and Alaska. What else is new in this world. The Senators serve their own interests and are oblivious to the concerns to the electorate.

Remember the mantra when the cost of this kimchee hits the fan; it is Bush's fault. Both of these doddering fools need to spend their twilight years in Florida; aka God's little waiting room.
13 posted on 09/01/2006 6:25:39 AM PDT by Bubba M. Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

Spend-happy hosers. Stevens should be ashamed - hah! I think he has none.

On the other hand, hats off to Sen. Coburn of Oklahoma. He is my kind of conservative.


14 posted on 09/01/2006 6:26:21 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

Further proof that here isn't enough difference between most Dems and Pubbies to shake a stick at.

They work more in cahoots than we care to admit.


15 posted on 09/01/2006 6:26:47 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

Unfortunately, you're right.
These days, there are three political parties: Democats, Republicans and Conservatives


16 posted on 09/01/2006 6:26:55 AM PDT by nancyvideo (nancyvideo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo
Despite lifting the hold, Byrd still wants the bill to be "debated and opened for amendment, and not pushed through without discussion," he said.

The mind boggles. I wonder what kind of amendments would be proposed for this bill. "Yes, I would like to amend the bill so that this website only be available to those on dial-up. We....uhh....don't want the server to get bogged down by all the broadbanders out there. Not enough tubes."
17 posted on 09/01/2006 6:28:43 AM PDT by RippyO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

18 posted on 09/01/2006 6:28:55 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (What Darwin denied he now regrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

Everyone should understand that a "hold" means nothing. In fact the hold doesn't exist in the Senate rules. It is simply an understanding between Senators that once a "hold" is put on a bill, it doesn't move. It is part of the country-club, hail-fellow-well-met world of Senators, where I suppose principle matters less than than making sure all the ol' boys stay cordial.

As I understand it, "holds" have been defied before. Exactly why the Republican leadership failed to defy Senator Byrd's hold I don't know.


19 posted on 09/01/2006 6:31:12 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

"secret hold"?

Yup....double secret hold.


20 posted on 09/01/2006 6:35:03 AM PDT by markoman (The man with the rubber glove was....surprisingly gentle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Exactly why the Republican leadership failed to defy Senator Byrd's hold I don't know.

Because a Republican also had a hold on it, so it was mutually agreeable?

21 posted on 09/01/2006 6:35:14 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
No mystery to it. The GOP has no leadership. They wouldn't take sides in a marbles shoot-off.
22 posted on 09/01/2006 6:35:43 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

This is a perfect example of why no senator from either party should ever get close to the WH, what a terrible precendent that would be.


23 posted on 09/01/2006 6:37:36 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I predicted Stevens or Byrd. Looks like I was right on both counts.


24 posted on 09/01/2006 6:41:00 AM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
The GOP has no leadership.

This would be a good time for some GOP presidential hopefuls to step forward and take this call for action off hold.
25 posted on 09/01/2006 6:48:07 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bubba M. Aurelius

Yikes! We are full of these types....no room for more!!


26 posted on 09/01/2006 6:48:57 AM PDT by jch10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: P-40

Don't count Wimp Frist among em.


27 posted on 09/01/2006 6:49:50 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: P-40

A bipartisan hold.


28 posted on 09/01/2006 6:51:28 AM PDT by sportutegrl (A person is a person, no matter how small. (Dr. Seuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markoman

Double Secret Hold!

29 posted on 09/01/2006 6:57:03 AM PDT by JOE6PAK (FAKE, but ACCURATE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

So why can't the conservatives (or liberals) just adopt this as a routine strategy and put secret holds on all legislation they don't like that the opposition proposes?


30 posted on 09/01/2006 7:11:02 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Lol, that's funny. Byrd is certainly a piece of work.


31 posted on 09/01/2006 7:24:24 AM PDT by khnyny (Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

You are really behind times. Now,we name everything in West Virginia "the ALan Mollohan" building, highway, school, etc.


32 posted on 09/01/2006 7:56:41 AM PDT by Bushiefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bushiefan

Thanks for catching me up. I won't make that mistake again.

LOL!


33 posted on 09/01/2006 8:07:26 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

So why can't the conservatives (or liberals) just adopt this as a routine strategy and put secret holds on all legislation they don't like that the opposition proposes?



Just because the left engages in secret, slimy behaviour
doesn't mean it's acceptable. I like to think onservatives act from principle instead of the 'win at all cost' behaviour of the left.


34 posted on 09/01/2006 8:41:07 AM PDT by nancyvideo (nancyvideo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson