Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High-Value Detainees Will Be Given Prisoner-of-War Status
ABC News ^ | 9/6/06

Posted on 09/06/2006 10:45:50 AM PDT by DogBarkTree

Sept. 6, 2006 — ABC News has learned that President Bush will announce that high-value detainees now being held at secret CIA prisons will be transferred to the Department of Defense and granted protections under the 1949 Geneva Conventions. It will be the first time the Administration publicly acknowledges the existence of the prisons.

A source familiar with the president's announcement says it will apply to all prisoners now being held by the CIA, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the Sept.11 attacks, and senior al Qaeda leader Ramzi Binalshibh.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
I dont see how any of this is a good thing.
1 posted on 09/06/2006 10:45:52 AM PDT by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

I don't have a problem with this at all. Anything that gets us thinking about this AS a war, and not a police action, is good. Why should we be afraid of our legal process working? We can't prosecute someone as a POW for war crimes?


2 posted on 09/06/2006 10:47:16 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

They can be held forever, as the war will never be over.

Thats the only upside I can see.


3 posted on 09/06/2006 10:48:02 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

If they're legally POWs, they don't have to have a trial, nor representation, nor visitation - thus avoiding the Gitmo Controversy.


4 posted on 09/06/2006 10:49:25 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Practically speaking, what does this mean? Does Khalid Sheik Mohammed have access to a lwayer, etc? Where will they be kept?


5 posted on 09/06/2006 10:49:50 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
We can prosecute them in Virginia though. I'm sure everyone but the current Governor would love to ~

In fact, there are probably a lot of folks who'd like to do a Jack Ruby as they are "transferred" ~ now, if "W" will just give everyone the time and place eh!

6 posted on 09/06/2006 10:50:20 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Does this mean they get cigarettes from the Red Crescent?


7 posted on 09/06/2006 10:52:36 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

It probably doesn't matter anymore. Or we get some advantage from it, such as continued incarceration until the war is over.


8 posted on 09/06/2006 10:53:51 AM PDT by TexanToTheCore (This space for hire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

I don't believe anything ABC says. They would spin or misinterpret anything to fit their agenda and write a headline which was unrelated to the story if needed.


9 posted on 09/06/2006 10:53:52 AM PDT by bpjam (Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Where will they be kept?

In Karl Rove's basement, of course!
10 posted on 09/06/2006 10:56:01 AM PDT by RedCell ("...thou shalt kill thine enemy before he killeth you by any means available" - Dick Marcinko)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree; sure_fine

This is bad, really bad.


11 posted on 09/06/2006 10:56:41 AM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage. Try it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

POWs don't get lawyers until and unless they are charged with war crimes.


12 posted on 09/06/2006 11:03:20 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Will the French like us now?


13 posted on 09/06/2006 11:09:04 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
I dont see how any of this is a good thing.

Simple.
1. They cannot have US legal representation (ie, STFU ACLU.)
2. They can be legally detained as long as the war is in progress (ie, STFU ACLU & Dems.)
3. They are legally recognized as members of an enemy military (ie, STFU DNC.)
4. Information obtained from the can be legally used for military purposes without legal challenge to collecting that information. (ie, STFU ACLU, DNC, Dean, DU, etc, etc..)
5. It takes this talking point away from the Dems (ie, STFU DNC.)

14 posted on 09/06/2006 11:09:35 AM PDT by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
The story seems to stop a hair's breadth short of saying that these prisoners will be declared prisoners of war.

And legally how can they be so declared when the U.S. Congress has not declared war?
15 posted on 09/06/2006 11:10:23 AM PDT by xenophiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
..and the BIG good thing, according to the President, those held by the CIA are now being transfered to GITMO.. this gives the military direct control over intelligence and gives more support to GITMO!

President Bush just gave Durbin the finger.


16 posted on 09/06/2006 11:13:13 AM PDT by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

We'll all have to wait unti tonight to find out what Queen Bee Qati Khouric has to say about it ... /sarc>


17 posted on 09/06/2006 11:15:29 AM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

If so, I hope that the packages are thoroughly scrutinized. During WWII such packages often contained articles of immense interest to the captors. IIRC The Red Cross wasn't involved but packages from some other sources emulated Cracker Jacks to the POW's immense satisfaction.


18 posted on 09/06/2006 11:20:18 AM PDT by magslinger (If at first you don't succeed, squeeze, squeeze again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bpjam

It IS spin. The president's speech sounded good.


19 posted on 09/06/2006 11:22:39 AM PDT by Huck (There is a $2.00 service charge for this tagline---do you still wish to proceed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

That was photoshopped.


20 posted on 09/06/2006 11:23:47 AM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Thank you for that brief there. Exactly what I was looking for.


21 posted on 09/06/2006 11:27:20 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Thanks. Then this could be a good thing.


22 posted on 09/06/2006 11:27:38 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Nope, that was real.. It was a big deal back in the 04 election.. the dems thought it would upset the Right.. we just loved it...


23 posted on 09/06/2006 11:27:45 AM PDT by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RedCell
Where will they be kept?

In Karl Rove's basement, of course!

Not possible - the Haliburton Hurricane Generator(tm) and the Diebold Remote Voter Override Console(tm) have pretty much taken up the whole basement. Karl even had to move his ping-pong table out into the garage.

24 posted on 09/06/2006 11:46:50 AM PDT by AzSteven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

25 posted on 09/06/2006 11:53:08 AM PDT by Gritty (Fighting the jihad in the courtroom means you’ll lose - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

yes, he will go to Gitmo.

the bottom line is this - this was inveitable, and Bush has laid this at the hands of Congress and the people. he is serving up the worst SOBs we have, the 9/11 plotters, and telling congress and the people "go ahead, tell us what rights to trial you want to give these people".

I don't blame him - Bush is fed up with this crap, and so are many of us. if a majority of Americans are too stupid to understand what is at stake and protect themselves, then to hell with them.


26 posted on 09/06/2006 11:56:24 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

federal courts have already extended habeas to people at Gitmo - they are flying lawyers in there now routinely. I suspect that these new arrivals will also get them.

there is some risk in doing this, but Bush is "all in" now on this and has laid it on Congress.


27 posted on 09/06/2006 12:01:18 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Great reply. Thanks. This is a good example why I love FR.


28 posted on 09/06/2006 12:17:14 PM PDT by DogBarkTree (The United States failure to act against Iran will be seen as weakness throughout the Muslim world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: butternut_squash_bisque

I personally don't know, but........




Wednesday, September 06, 2006

The President Strikes Back [Mario Loyola]

The President just pulled one of the best maneuvers of his entire presidency. By transferring most major Al Qaeda terrorists to Guantanamo, and simultaneously sending Congress a bill to rescue the Military Commissions from the Supreme Court's ruling Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the President spectacularly ambushed the Democrats on terrain they fondly thought their own. Now Democrats who oppose (and who have vociferously opposed) the Military Commissions will in effect be opposing the prosecution of the terrorists who planned and launched the attacks of September 11 for war crimes.
And if that were not enough, the President also frontally attacked the Hamdan ruling's potentially chilling effect on CIA extraordinary interrogation techniques, by arguing that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions is too vague, and asking Congress to define clearly the criminal law limiting the scope of permissible interrogation.

Taken as a whole, the President's maneuver today turned the political tables completely around. He stole the terms of debate from the Democrats, and rewrote them, all in a single speech. It will be delightful to watch in coming days and hours as bewildered Democrats try to understand what just hit them, and then sort through the rubble of their anti-Bush national security strategy to see what, if anything, remains.

Posted at 2:42 PM

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1696591/posts


29 posted on 09/06/2006 2:03:53 PM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

There's *one in a row*, for America, s_f.


30 posted on 09/06/2006 3:22:23 PM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage. Try it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: butternut_squash_bisque

Setting the Record Straight


Some Reports Claim "High-Value Detainees Will Be Given Prisoner-Of-War Status."

But Neither The President's Proposed Legislation Nor The Detainees' Transfer To Guantanamo Gives The Detainees POW Status

The President's Legislation Specifically Authorizes The Creation Of Military Commissions To Try These Suspected Terrorists For War Crimes. The Bill ensures that these commissions are established in a way that protects our national security and ensures a full and fair trial for the accused.

Detainees Have Been Transferred To The Custody Of The Department Of Defense, At The U.S. Naval Base At Guantanamo Bay.

Neither The President's Proposed Legislation Nor The Detainees' Transfer To Guantanamo Gives The Detainees POW Status.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060906-7.html


31 posted on 09/06/2006 4:14:51 PM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson