Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smith & Wesson (SWHC) Secures Supply Contracts with Ohio Police and Dallas Airport Police
StreetInsider.com ^ | 9/6/06 | n/a

Posted on 09/07/2006 12:02:01 PM PDT by kiriath_jearim

Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (Nasdaq: SWHC) has secured contracts to supply the Columbus, Ohio Police Department and the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Police (DFW) with the company's advanced-design polymer pistol, the M&P40.

The agreements call for 1,875 M&P40 pistols to be shipped to the Columbus Police Department and 305 M&P40 pistols to be shipped for use by DFW Airport police officers.

Tom Taylor, Smith & Wesson's Vice President of Marketing, said, "Since the M&P Pistol Series was first introduced in November 2005, it has quickly changed performance expectations in the duty firearm test and evaluation process. We are proud to support the men and women of the Columbus Police Department and the Dallas Fort Worth Airport Police, and are pleased to add them to the growing number of law enforcement agencies that have selected M&P pistols."



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunporn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Shooter 2.5

...."Fifteen posts to get to someone who didn't get the word.

Smith and Wesson is no longer the company who made the deal with clintoons. They are gone. They fled back to England.

Smith and Wesson is now an American owned and operated company. They have nothing and I repeat, nothing to do with the clintoon agreement"....

Hogwash!!

S&W may be under new ownership. But when you purchase a business you assume the assests AND THE LIABILITIES of said business! One of the liabilities that the new owners assumed was the 2000 Clinton gun control agreement. And one of the things that the company will forever have to live down is their betrayal of the American shooting public and the 2A, no matter who now happens to own the company. The company is still named Smith & Wesson right?? If the new owners don't like this they should have perhaps been a little more discriminating about the business that they chose to purchase. To put it another way, do you think you could purchase Enron and have a sparkling clear reputation because "there is new ownership"?

You are free to deal with any company you like. I, like most shooters I know, choose NOT to deal with S&W. S&W doesn't like it? Tough! I didn't like their company (the SAME S&W) attempting to sell out my second amendment rights!


21 posted on 09/07/2006 5:41:55 PM PDT by Mtner77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

For my money, the 1911 .45 design has never been equalled or exceeded in elegance, utility or performance. IMO, it's the best, bar none. Newfangled stuff - bah!


22 posted on 09/07/2006 6:34:42 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mtner77

So why do you own a Ruger?
Why did you mention Colt?
I wonder how many Chinese SKS's you own.


23 posted on 09/07/2006 6:54:50 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

Its basically the same trigger as the Glock..the "safe action."

A consistent five or six lb crisp pull that has no creep and is always the same, every time you pull the trigger.


24 posted on 09/07/2006 7:23:59 PM PDT by Armedanddangerous (Paranoid? I'm carrying a Glock 17, an extra magazine and a knife, why would I be paranoid?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Elegant, yet understated.

Enjoy.
25 posted on 09/08/2006 3:18:54 AM PDT by roaddog727 (Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mtner77

S&W could do wonders for its credibility by renouncing the Clinton era agreement. While the ownership has changed and they've said the company's past actions were a mistake, they've never "renounced" the agreement with the Clintons. They should do that.


26 posted on 09/08/2006 6:27:11 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

It's a nice handgun, I know a few fellows who are competing in IDPA with them.

Not my particular cup of tea because of the magazine disconnect. It's a pain in the ass to clear the weapon, and, in a combat situation, if I have a round in the chamber and accidentally drop the mag, I'd like to be able to still fire the weapon.


27 posted on 09/08/2006 6:56:20 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

...."S&W could do wonders for its credibility by renouncing the Clinton era agreement. While the ownership has changed and they've said the company's past actions were a mistake, they've never "renounced" the agreement with the Clintons. They should do that."....

Exactly. I think that it might go a long way toward softening some of the bitter feelings that still remain.

Shooter 2.5

As I said above, you are free to deal with whatever company you choose. But I am also free to do the same.


28 posted on 09/08/2006 11:15:51 AM PDT by Mtner77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

There's no one to renounce it to. That administartion was voted out of office.

Smith and Wesson is ignoring the agreement and the Bush administration is doing the same.
I guess you want to boycott the Republicans who ignored the Assault Weapons Ban too?


29 posted on 09/09/2006 1:02:53 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mtner77

Yes you are. Foreign manufactures and a couple American ones who also caved to the political realities back then.

Putting another American gun company out of business doesn't help us. I wonder if you ever bought a Winchester?


30 posted on 09/09/2006 1:05:53 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
I like old S&W's revolvers. I own several and wouldn't mind owning a few more. I didn't like S&W's British parents' deal with the Clintons.
If the new owners of S&W want to renounce the former's Clinton connection, that would be a good thing. What's your problem with that ?
31 posted on 09/09/2006 10:18:34 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

MY GOD HAS THIS STOCK BLOWN UP!

And I thought 10.93 was high

WOW


32 posted on 09/13/2006 11:05:55 AM PDT by roofgoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: roofgoat

It will hit $15 as momemtum investor see whats happening.


33 posted on 09/13/2006 11:39:01 AM PDT by samadams2000 (Somebody important make....THE CALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

I've been reading some Investment Boards since I bought some of this and the posters agree with you. Cross Fingers.


34 posted on 09/13/2006 11:46:36 AM PDT by roofgoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

That is a great pic, but S&W is against the USA.


We want Colt .45


35 posted on 09/16/2006 12:15:09 AM PDT by Nitro (Mil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson