Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passions Flare as Broadcast of 9/11 Mini-Series Nears (Clintons go after Kean)
NYSlimes ^

Posted on 09/07/2006 10:59:09 PM PDT by hipaatwo

Under growing pressure from Democrats and aides to former President Bill Clinton, ABC is re-evaluating and in some cases re-editing crucial scenes in its new mini-series “The Path to 9/11” to soften its portrait of the Clinton administration’s pursuit of Osama bin Laden, according to people involved in the project.

Among the changes, ABC is altering one scene in which an actor playing Samuel R. Berger, the former national security adviser, abruptly hangs up on a C.I.A. officer during a critical moment in a military operation, according to Thomas H. Kean, a consultant on the ABC project and co-chairman of the federal Sept. 11 commission.

Mr. Berger has said that the scene is a fiction, and Mr. Kean, in an interview, said that he believed Mr. Berger was correct and that ABC was making appropriate changes.

The reassessment came as two Clinton aides mounted an unusual attack last night on the motives of Mr. Kean, a Republican and a former governor of New Jersey. In a letter to Mr. Kean, the two aides, Bruce R. Lindsey and Douglas Band, wrote that his defense of the mini-series “is destroying the bipartisan aura of the 9/11 Commission,” on whose findings the project is partly based. They asserted that Mr. Kean was driven by payments from ABC or his own partisan politics.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; bubba; clintonfailures; clintonlegacy; clintonscandals; coverup; pathto911; sept11; whitewash; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2006 10:59:11 PM PDT by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Peach; Howlin; Txsleuth; SE Mom

Clinton aides mounted an unusual attack last night on the motives of Mr. Kean


Unusual my butt! S.O.P. is more like it.


2 posted on 09/07/2006 11:00:25 PM PDT by hipaatwo (Vote for your life. Every vote for a Democrat is a vote against victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Gnashing of teeth and great wailing...while Micheal Moore's 9/11 trash was hailed as the truth beyond doubt...
3 posted on 09/07/2006 11:01:03 PM PDT by Dallas59 (ISLAMOFASCISM!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
4 posted on 09/07/2006 11:02:03 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59; hipaatwo

Using you to mark my spot. I need zzzz's!


Nite..Can't wait to see what tomorrow brings and listen to Rush!


5 posted on 09/07/2006 11:03:40 PM PDT by hipaatwo (Vote for your life. Every vote for a Democrat is a vote against victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo; Mo1; STARWISE; Peach; Texasforever
Bruce R. Lindsey and Douglas Band, wrote that his defense of the mini-series “is destroying the bipartisan aura of the 9/11 Commission,” on whose findings the project is partly based. They asserted that Mr. Kean was driven by payments from ABC or his own partisan politics.

Like I was saying, a full court press.

SOBs.

6 posted on 09/07/2006 11:05:35 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Surprise, surprise - - ABC is running like a scared bunny rabbit.


7 posted on 09/07/2006 11:06:28 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
...Bruce R. Lindsey and Douglas Band, wrote that his defense of the mini-series “is destroying the bipartisan aura of the 9/11 Commission,”...

"Bipartisan?" Clinton made sure one of the members was a sleezebag lawyer who defended him during Whitewater, (Ben Veniste) and the another was a crook who used her appointed position to cover up treason by the Clintons. (Gorelick.) They insured the final report would be scrubbed of any incriminating evidence.

The 9/11 commission was about as non-partisan as anything Klink touches.

8 posted on 09/07/2006 11:06:53 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

I predict this whole thing is going to blow up BIG TIME right in the faces of Clinton and every Clintonista and Democrat who cried like big fat babies over a simple miniseries. Now people want to know, What is the big deal? Clinton wasn't even President when 9/11 happened so why is he so upset? and other inconvenient questions.


9 posted on 09/07/2006 11:08:18 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

The only thing Unusual is.. Network TV portraying Liberals in anything but a Fraudulently Favorable light.
It will be interesting to see if this becomes a "cut and run" by ABC.


10 posted on 09/07/2006 11:08:55 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts (I went to bed on 9/10/01 a Democrat... I woke up on 9/11/01 a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
“is destroying the bipartisan aura of the 9/11 Commission,”

Now that is laugh-out-loud funny!

11 posted on 09/07/2006 11:09:25 PM PDT by Shelayne (...And though my heart is torn, I will praise You in this storm... ~~Casting Crowns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; Mia T

ping


12 posted on 09/07/2006 11:10:38 PM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Freepmail! ( It will put a smile on your face)

Now I'm going to be for sure.

Nite


13 posted on 09/07/2006 11:11:56 PM PDT by hipaatwo (Vote for your life. Every vote for a Democrat is a vote against victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

be-bed..geez


14 posted on 09/07/2006 11:13:04 PM PDT by hipaatwo (Vote for your life. Every vote for a Democrat is a vote against victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

There is nothing unusual about "Arkanside" being carried out or threatened. We've all seen it before.


15 posted on 09/07/2006 11:13:39 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Amazingly, I had forgotten just how evil these people really are. If nothing else, this episode will show everyone just how corrupt the National Democrat Party has become after 14 years of Clintonization.


16 posted on 09/07/2006 11:14:27 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

The Left is going insane over this; they are exposing their true motives of wanting us all to forget about 9/11.


17 posted on 09/07/2006 11:15:09 PM PDT by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

I had forgotten how violenty ILL they can make me feel.

I always hated them because of the way it makes me feel to hate them so much.


18 posted on 09/07/2006 11:18:37 PM PDT by Howlin (Who in the press will stick up for ABC's right to air this miniseries? ~~NRO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Kean is a fool...imagine hiring yourself out as a consultant on this tragedy...typical politician...always on the make for cash.
Nevertheless, he pales besides the arch partisan Ben Verniste...
I would like to read a book about how the 911 panel was assembled. A total political trade off ensuring no accountability and enhancing Bin Laden's legend as as a genius.


19 posted on 09/07/2006 11:19:39 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

You have too much faith in the intelligence of the American people. The swing voters are largely unintelligent, tuned-out people. All they know, if anything, is that ABC is backing down because Clinton said they were unfair. They are just as likely to believe Clinton and not question his motives, especially when ABC isn't defending itself.


20 posted on 09/07/2006 11:20:55 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I always hated them because of the way it makes me feel to hate them so much.

Of the Clintons, it can truly be said... They have the uncanny ability to bring out the absolute worst, in everybody... That is, I suppose, their unique "charm"...

the infowarrior

21 posted on 09/07/2006 11:22:38 PM PDT by infowarrior (The GOP runs the US, the Dems run their mouths... Freeper HardStarboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
All quarters .. on deck. Will Marc or Denise Rich be piping up soon with outrage?

The Clinton officials say that ABC repeatedly refused to send them advance copies of The Path to 9/11, but did send screeners to right-wing bloggers.

"Both Clinton and Bush officials come under fire, and if it seems more anti-Clinton, that's only because they were in office a lot longer than Team Bush before 9/11," said L. Brent Bozell, president of the conservative Media Research Center, who saw a preview of the miniseries. "The film doesn't play favorites and the Bush administration takes its lumps as well."

The film's writer-producer, Cyrus Nowrasteh, whose credits include the 2001 docudrama The Day Reagan Was Shot, dismissed such assertions.

In an interview Wednesday with Los Angeles radio station KRLA-AM, the filmmaker explained away the contradictions with the 9/11 Commission by insisting Path was based on two other books, The Cell by former ABC journalist John Miller and Michael Stone, and The Relentless Pursuit by Samuel Katz.

He also said that he took dramatic license with certain events. "You know' when you're making a movie, a lot of things happen on set that are unscripted. Accidents occur, spontaneous reactions of actors performing a role take place. It’s the job of the filmmaker to say, 'You know, maybe we can use that.' "

But left-wing bloggers point out that Nowrateh has described himself as a conservative and that Disney has a history of trying not to offend the Bush administration, notably by barring its Miramax division from releasing Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11.

"The attacks of 9/11 were a pivotal moment in our history, and it is fitting that the debate about the events related to the attacks continue," ABC added in its statement. A spokesman also said that the network hadn't received any feedback indicating its affiliates were jittery about airing the miniseries.

Some experts, however, doubted that ABC's statement would be enough to stem the flood of criticism.

"I suppose we can't make a judgment until we have seen it," Robert Thompson, director for the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University, told E! Online. "Disclaimers are not enough to satisfy people who can demonstrate that incorrect information is being given out. They're going to make a lot of noise about it and it's going to be in the public conservation for a long time."

Thompson also took issue with the way ABC planned to present The Path to 9/11.

"What I find especially interesting is ABC playing this without commercials presumably as a public service. Now that's kind of odd," he said. "The idea is that your going to show something in terms of public interest without commercials, then it attaches the ownership of the content to the network itself."

While ABC is sticking by the TV movie, one of its key partners isn't. Spooked by the firestorm the film has provoked, Scholastic Inc. announced Thursday that it was scrapping a Path to 9/11-branded "field guide" intended to allow high schoolers to use the movie as an educational tool. Instead, the publisher will distribute discussion materials focusing on "critical thinking and media literacy skills."

"After a thorough review of the original guide that we offered online to about 25,000 high school teachers, we determined that the materials did not meet our high standards for dealing with controversial issues," said Dick Robinson, Scholastic's chairman, president and CEO.

Among the topics Scholastic says its new "media literacy" kit will tackle: "What is a docudrama; how does it differ from a documentary; what are the differences between factual reporting and a dramatization?"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Definitely starting the smear Kean chapter .. watch for his son, Tom, to start getting heat re his NJ senate election campaign.

22 posted on 09/07/2006 11:22:42 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Undoubtedly some of the same people would have been interviewed by both the writer of the miniseries and the 9/11 commission staff. It would be interesting to know how those interviews played into both final products and the 9/11 interviews that ended up on the "cutting room floor".


23 posted on 09/07/2006 11:23:28 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: spyone

I tend to agree about Kean. Whether or not he's exactly a fool, he's certainly a squish and an establishmentarian. He will end up giving the Rats whatever they want, if they want it badly enough. It's basically what this type of Republican is bred to do.


24 posted on 09/07/2006 11:24:17 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Perhaps we'll hear from Vince Foster or Monica before the night is over, huh?


25 posted on 09/07/2006 11:24:44 PM PDT by Howlin (Who in the press will stick up for ABC's right to air this miniseries? ~~NRO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
A small throng of reporters who followed [Senator Hillary Clinton] out of the building toward her office were kept at bay by her aides. -PATRICK HEALY and JESSE McKINLEY

Translation: reporters pretended that they would stop at nothing to ask Hillary a tough question, like "Why are you censoring ABC?" then feigned being foiled from this brave (pretense of) fair reporting when one aide lifted a pinky finger at them.

26 posted on 09/07/2006 11:26:27 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I'd like to hear from Linda Tripp .. anyone heard how she's doing?


27 posted on 09/07/2006 11:29:55 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Is anyone surprised the spinal gutless Liberal network ABC has done some editing to appease the Clintonistas?


I hope Republicans run ads attacking the pos Sandy Berger and his mentor Billy boy clinton for failing to go after Bin Laden which was one of the main reasons for 9/11 attack.


28 posted on 09/07/2006 11:30:31 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Do not tune in to this movie. It is nothing but ''Hollywood magic''! I repeat, do not watch this movie. Nothing in it is real! It is all '' AN ILLUSION''............
29 posted on 09/07/2006 11:32:32 PM PDT by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Mr Kean had better stay out of Fort Marcy Park.


30 posted on 09/07/2006 11:32:41 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Truth gets buried again...


31 posted on 09/07/2006 11:33:51 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; onyx; All
Looks like the Kean smear campaign is having an effect:

Under growing pressure from Democrats and aides to former President Bill Clinton, ABC is re-evaluating and in some cases re-editing crucial scenes in its new mini-series “The Path to 9/11” to soften its portrait of the Clinton administration’s pursuit of Osama bin Laden, according to people involved in the project.

Among the changes, ABC is altering one scene in which an actor playing Samuel R. Berger, the former national security adviser, abruptly hangs up on a C.I.A. officer during a critical moment in a military operation, according to Thomas H. Kean, a consultant on the ABC project and co-chairman of the federal Sept. 11 commission.

Mr. Berger has said that the scene is a fiction, and Mr. Kean, in an interview, said that he believed Mr. Berger was correct and that ABC was making appropriate changes."

32 posted on 09/07/2006 11:34:36 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
(Clintons go after Kean)

Gawd, he's going for an oval office moment with a male????

33 posted on 09/07/2006 11:38:09 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Mr. Clinton, did you make any mistakes in the period leading up to the attacks on our nation that took place on 9/11/2006? (The MSM is keen on Bush mistakes, but lean on Clinton mistakes.)
34 posted on 09/07/2006 11:39:05 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I'm all for accuracy, but Kean could be caving for reasons other than accuracy.


35 posted on 09/07/2006 11:42:52 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
So once again the American public are going to have the screws put to them because clinton's lies AGAIN!

August 19th 1946 was a very dark day for the USA and should be observed as a day of mourning as long as clinton, the lying snake is allowed to walk free. Most prisoners behind bars for life have committed less crimes than he has, yet he's treated as though he can walk on water.
36 posted on 09/07/2006 11:43:35 PM PDT by AmeriBrit ( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
The Clinton officials say that ABC repeatedly refused to send them advance copies of The Path to 9/11, but did send screeners to right-wing bloggers.

If those "right-wing bloggers" have screeners, we can find out what was changed between then and broadcast night.

As usual, "Clinton officials" (he's out of office now, how can some buttboy be an "official"? Of what?)are lieing, which is part of their nature. Parsing that statement, I suspect they were demanding the ability to rewrite the script. They may still get it, but they had to put on a full court press.

37 posted on 09/07/2006 11:46:15 PM PDT by 300winmag (Overkill never fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Related :

Live Thread: Writer of Path to 9-11 on Radio

This evening ,...here in Los Angeles....

38 posted on 09/07/2006 11:47:28 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

I can't remember, but which one of the networks did a "docudrama" on the Reagans and had Ronald Reagan saying stuff to Nancy, in the privacy of their home, about AIDS and we were supposed to believe that "the watergate man?" was privvy to those conversations. As I recall, the made up conversation was played on TV and the libs didn't care then that the conversation was made up, farfetched, outright lie, etc.


39 posted on 09/07/2006 11:51:00 PM PDT by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: machogirl


That was US, this is THEM.


40 posted on 09/07/2006 11:51:55 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

Don't you think the Clinton's welcome is wearing thin?
The cat is out of the bag for heaven's sake.
Is Billy boy's ego that fragile?

Well , their antics will make for even bigger
publicity. Back fire?


41 posted on 09/08/2006 12:03:30 AM PDT by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Tripp sued the DoD for releasing information from her security file and employment file to the news media in violation of the Privacy Act of 1974. On November 3, 2003, Tripp settled with the DoD for $595,000 Since the Lewinsky scandal, Tripp has moved to Northern Virginia, had extensive plastic surgery, married German architect Dieter Rausch (a longtime sweetheart) in 2004, and opened with her new husband a year-round Christmas shop, called the Christmas Sleigh, in Middleburg, Virginia. I would never have recognized her. She is also a breast cancer survivor.

42 posted on 09/08/2006 12:07:36 AM PDT by AmeriBrit ( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

Thanks ... I remember that. I wonder how she's doing today .. lifewise and healthwise.


43 posted on 09/08/2006 12:18:48 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
(Clintons go after Kean)

Who would thunk B.J. was gay???

44 posted on 09/08/2006 12:18:49 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

TV Movie Miffs Dems

An ABC made-for-TV movie, "The Path to 9/11," has riled the Democratic Party. Democratic National Committee Executive Director, Tom McMahon, blasted the movie, which he has not yet seen, as “a bald-faced attempt to slander Democrats and revise history right before Americans vote in a major election. This film would have us believe that Bill Clinton irresponsibly dallied with an intern while the terrorist threat mounted. This kind of misinformation is a cheap, callous political trick designed to divert attention from Bush Administration failures. As Katie Couric pointed out on the CBS Evening News, the war with the terrorists STARTED on 9/11. McMahon observed. “Bill Clinton was long out of office on that day and cannot be blamed for these attacks.”

Clinton spokesman, Jay Carson, issued a statement questioning the film's depiction of Clinton's record and suggesting that it wasn't a "serious treatment" of the facts. “The film says nothing about healthcare,” Carson said. “Yet, implementing a nationalized healthcare system was a major focus of the Clinton Administration. Further, President Clinton never ‘dallied’ with an intern. He was mentoring Ms. Lewinski, helping her learn the skills she needed to succeed in politics.”

Former Clinton Administration Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, said that although she had requested a copy of the film, ABC had not given her one. But, Ms. Albright said, she has been told by people who have seen it that it “It asserts as fact things that are not fact. For one, it depicts me as a decrepit hag and blithering idiot.”

Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called the film’s contention that terrorists attacked America during the Clinton years as “ludicrous.” “This film shows terrorists bombing the World Trade Center in 1993,” Pelosi said. “Whoever heard of such a thing? The film even has these alleged terrorists bombing embassies in Africa and, get this, a U.S. Naval vessel. It’s like a global jihad or something. I know movies often take liberties with the truth for dramatic purposes, but this film goes beyond the realm of credibility into pure fantasy.”

In a letter to the ABC television network, the Democratic senate leadership--Harry Reid (Nev), Dick Durbin (Ill), Debbie Stabenow (Mich), Charles Schumer (NY), and Byron Dorgan (ND)—threatened to revoke the company’s broadcast license once Democrats take back control of Congress. “The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest,” the senators wrote. “Congress is the judge of whether the public interest has been served. May we remind you that polls show our Party will regain control of Congress in this November’s election. You would do well to consider this as you weigh how to edit this film or whether to air it at all.”


read more...

http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm


45 posted on 09/08/2006 12:20:04 AM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

A heads up to all who thought the Clinton Slime Machine was in retirement.

The Arkansas Grifters will stop at nothing to regain power,get back in the White House, and take over your country.


46 posted on 09/08/2006 12:22:36 AM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO WANT TO TAKE OVER YOUR COUNTRY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Sounds like she's doing OK according to this newsletter from her 'Christmassleigh' business:

http://thechristmassleigh.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=1/CTGY/2400

I had a quick look at some of the things on the site and they look really nice. Will take another look when I have some time and perhaps order a few things for the holidays.
47 posted on 09/08/2006 12:27:50 AM PDT by AmeriBrit ( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

Great .. thanks!


48 posted on 09/08/2006 12:36:45 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie
I predict this whole thing is going to blow up BIG TIME right in the faces of Clinton

I disagree. It will be chopped, sliced, and diced before it's shown.

49 posted on 09/08/2006 12:41:18 AM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts
It will be interesting to see if this becomes a "cut and run" by ABC.

It will be.

50 posted on 09/08/2006 12:42:37 AM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson