My, my, my Dickie Meyer of CBS is all riled up. I think the media is getting a little nervous about November's elections.
All of the Libs phoney scandals have been exposed (e.g. Plane, terroist surveillance, Ohio 2004 vote process, etc). Now they are back to rehashing old phonely scandals and 3rd grade insults. Let's "Bush is a liar", now that is real clever. Or "Panties on head is torture, but Terrorists beheading folks is ok".
At least Dickie admitted the Dems are weak on National Security (or at least that is how voters view the Dems). With articles like this, Dickie shows why the view exists...and rightfully so.
posted on 09/08/2006 4:37:07 AM PDT
Abu Ghraib was where torture was photographed and then shown to the world. Similar torture was carried out, we learned, in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay.
Nobody got tortured at Abu Ghraib. They got humiliated. There IS a difference!!!! Secondly, if the administration was so keen on it, how come all the soldiers involved are in Leavenworth right now?
Do these guys have even the SLIGHTEST handle on reality?
This guy probably considers it 'torture' if his latte gets cold.
posted on 09/08/2006 4:40:55 AM PDT
My goodness... -Donald Rumsfeld
posted on 09/08/2006 4:45:42 AM PDT
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
Watching Katie Couric on CBS is torture .
posted on 09/08/2006 4:54:55 AM PDT
by lionheart 247365
(( I.S.L.A.M. stands for - Islams Spiritual Leaders Advocate Murder .. .. .. ))
Hey Meyer, I don't care if they torture the Islamic pukes. Why should I when I don't care if most were dead, just like they wish on me.
posted on 09/08/2006 5:01:17 AM PDT
Now Abu Ghraib was where torture was photographed
Whether you define what occurred there as torture or not it was in such violation of U.S. policy that those participating in it received pretty good jail sentences.
Further, the investigation and action that followed was initiated entirely by the military, and started by an enlisted man who reported the matter to his superiors who jumped on it immediately.
The only thing the media (and Dems) had to do with it was to try to screw it up.
posted on 09/08/2006 5:09:10 AM PDT
I couldn't be a liberal. I regard the well-being of my family over that of those who seek to destroy them.
"I've said to people we don't torture. And we don't."
blah blah liberal drivel, mindless inanities liberal leaps of logic translation: torture.
posted on 09/08/2006 5:21:10 AM PDT
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
This debate that Libs continue to wage; restages them on their doomed 'equal playing field'.
Can they really not see moral differientiation or does it just not serve their agenda? Can they really be this stupid?
The question answers itself, of course.
posted on 09/08/2006 5:32:04 AM PDT
(Live Liberal free. . .or suffer their consequences. . .)
I heard last night about one of the "techniques" the CIA used to get info from the high values they have outside the US. They were forced to watch old Rosie O'Donnell shows. I can't wait to hear the liberals yell about this being torture, inhumane and degrading.
Go to the CBS link and read the comments to this piece. There are only 12 comments (so far) and every one of them are anti-Bush.
The funny thing is, I kid you not, that at least half want to or elude to hitting Bush, slapping Bush, gouging out Bush's eyes, etc, etc. This from people that claim the President is a lying torturer!!!
Another states, "Finally, someone has the guts to tell it like it is..."
Bwahahaha!!!! 5 years of attacking Bush on every single issue, making phony movies about him (Michael Moore), saying "Bush lied, men died", and now Dick Meyer is the ONLY one to call the President a liar?
posted on 09/08/2006 5:58:15 AM PDT
by Alas Babylon!
(Wilson lied, as the knowing DBM fetched his water. Free Scooter! Jail Wilson!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson