Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaxxonWoods
That's a good idea. The only problem is that it would take longer to complete the regime change by bankrupting Iran, and so the regime change might drag on into the election campaign of 2008 and possibly not even be completed by the end of Bush's term. But we may be able to try a two-phased approach where the first phase is to seize their oil assets while assisting democracy supporters in Iran, then if that doesn't work we would do a fast invasion against a weakend Iranian army. The Iranian army might be very low on key supplies and motor fuel at that point so a bankruptcy could make an invasion much easier.

Let's hope the Iranians come to their senses and agree to end their nuclear weapons program, and I still think that will probably happen in the end after long negotations and a lot of fierce rhetoric from both sides.

7 posted on 09/08/2006 12:22:05 PM PDT by defenderSD (The concept of national martyrdom, combined with nuclear weapons, is extremely dangerous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: defenderSD

"The only problem is that it would take longer to complete the regime change by bankrupting Iran,..."

After Iraq, I don't count on fast anything. I agree with you on the main point, Bush will act if Iran doesn't play ball. On your last sentence, I just don't have a feel for that, but it would be nice if you are correct.


8 posted on 09/08/2006 12:51:28 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Free Iran! WARNING! Forbidden Cartoon: .. . *-O(( :-{>. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson