Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In New Letter, Clinton's Lawyers Demands ABC Yank Film
tpm cafe ^ | 9/9/06 | Greg Sargent

Posted on 09/09/2006 9:03:27 AM PDT by finnman69

On Friday evening, Bill Clinton's lawyers sent a new letter to ABC chief Bob Iger demanding that ABC yank "The Path to 9/11." We've obtained a copy of the letter, and it reads in part: "As a nation, we need to be focused on preventing another attack, not fictionalizing the last one for television ratings. `The Path to 9/11' not only tarnishes the work of the 9/11 Commission, but also cheapens the fith anniversary of what was a very painful moment in history for all Americans. We expect that you will make the responsible decision to not air this film." Full text of the letter after the jump.

Dear Bob,

Despite press reports that ABC/Disney has made changes in the content and marketing of "The Path to 9/11," we remailn concerned about the false impression that airing the show will leave on the public. Labelng the show as "fiction" does not meet your responsibility to the victims of the September 11th attacks, their families, the hard work of the 9/11 Commission, or to the American people as a whole.

At a moment when we should be debating how to make the nation safer by implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, "The Path to 9/11" calls into question the accuracy of the Commission's report and whether fabricated scenes are, in fact, an accurate portrayal of history. Indeed, the millions spent on the production of this fictional drama would have been better spent informing the public about the Commission's actual findings and the many recommendations that have yet to be acted upon. Unlike this film, that would have been a tremendous service to the public.

Although our request for an advance copy of the film has been repeatedly denied, it is all too clear that our objections to "The Path to 9/11" are valid and corroborated by those familiar with the film and intimately involved in its production.

-- Your corporate partner, Scholastic, has disassociated itself from this proect.

-- 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean, who served as co-executive producer on "The Path to 9/11," has stated that he raised concerns about the accuracy of several scenes in the film and that his concerns were not addressed during production.

-- Harvey Keitel, who plays the star role of FBI agent John O'Neill, told reporters yesterday that while the screenplay was presented to him as a fair treatment of historical events, he is upset that several scenes were simply invented for dramatic purposes.

-- Numerous Members of Congress, several 9/11 Commissioners and prominent historians have spoken out against this movie.

-- Indeed, according to press reports, the fact that you are still editing the film two days before it is scheduled to air is an admission that it is irreparably flawed.

As a nation, we need to be focused on preventing another attack, not fictionalizing the last one for television ratings. "The Path to 9/11" not only tarnishes the work of the 9/11 Commission, but also cheapens the fith anniversary of what was a very painful moment in history for all Americans. We expect that you will make the responsible decision to not air this film.

Sincerely,

Bruce R. Lindsey Chief Executive Officer William J. Clinton Foundation

Douglas J. Band Counselor to President Clinton Office of William Jefferson Clinton


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911; abc; benedictarnold; berger; bj; bjclinton; bluedress; bruce; clinton; clintonlegacy; clintonsporkweasel; cowards; d; donothingpresident; doug; gflowers; grifters; letter; liarinchief; liars; mcarthyism; monicasdress; nationaldisgrace; pathto911; paulajones; perjury; shootthelawyers; sinkemperor; stainondress; stainonovaloffice; stalinists; thieves; thugocracy; whileclintonslept; whitetrash; whitewater; whokilledfoster; whydidwtc7fall; yank
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350 ... 401-405 next last
To: finnman69

Now that ABC got this BS letter I'm sure it won't be pulled. Maybe altered too much but not pulled.

Bill Clinton was an effin' traitor (Loral deal etc.) and deserves whatever expose there is of his time in office. Did this creep blow getting Bin Laden and lay America open to attack? Of course he did along with Jamie Gorelick who went on to raid FANNIE MAE for a fat undeserved salary and bonus of $26 million in 6 years


251 posted on 09/09/2006 11:14:04 AM PDT by dennisw (Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I thought I heard Kean on television say that the movie was faithful to the 9/11 Commission Report and any changes he suggested were made?

Yes, Peach, I saw that with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears, too. The contempt these lying sacks show for the American people is amazing.

252 posted on 09/09/2006 11:17:13 AM PDT by Sal (Once you know they sold USA out to Red China, what do you think they would NOT do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

If he'd spent half as much time trying to get OBL as he has trying to get this miniseries dropped, 9/11 wouldn't have happened....


253 posted on 09/09/2006 11:17:44 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Dear ABC:

We'd hate to think you might commit suicide over a moive. Wink, Wink.

Bill'n Hill


254 posted on 09/09/2006 11:19:53 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, thats how you sell clothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
If the donks in the Senate could yank anyone's FCC broadcast license, why follow up the threat with an order by an attorney to *yank* the miniseries?

The only way the Democrats can even dream of pulling someone's license is if they get into power. Just getting control of the Senate won't do it, either. The appointments to the FCC aren't controlled by the Senate and I believe it is one of those agencies mandated to be split by party.

Does anyone seriously believe any politician would pull any broadcast license without a huge counter-suit all the way up to SCOTUS by the network involved? IMO, all the media watch groups could be subpoenaed to produce logs of any given network over at least ten years. These would prove that ABC, for example, usually came out in favor of the donks, although I do recall some analysis that showed them to be the most balanced of the alphanets.

I, too, want to see the lawyer's letter verified. If it is valid, then the "mole at ABC' theory has some legs, meaning ABC is fighting back.

Once the unedited DVDs hit the Internet and the street, we will see just what changes were made. I am tending to believe that the last two hours will so excoriate the Bush administration that the donks will only be praised for wanting to "spare the country" or some such rot.
255 posted on 09/09/2006 11:20:58 AM PDT by reformedliberal ("Eliminate the mullahs and Islam shall disappear in fifty years." Ayatollah Khomeini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Dear Bill Clinton,
Eat me.

You know all about that. That was what you were doing while Rome burned.

Love,

Laz

256 posted on 09/09/2006 11:25:39 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl
I have a question: Does anyone know whether most of the objection to this miniseries is coming from individual viewers or just the Democrat bigwigs.

The latter only.

257 posted on 09/09/2006 11:26:16 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Has anyone seen any press releases from ABC, or response from ABC Chairman/CEO? Any idea if they are filming an 'apology but we aren't going to air the series afterall and so sit back, relax and enjoy these re-runs of I Love Lucy'

The ABC lawyers must be working l-o-n-g hours right now.


258 posted on 09/09/2006 11:26:34 AM PDT by hardworking (Comrades Clinton - protecting you from 'unapproved' information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
I assume we are not talking about write-in campaigns, but strictly the Democratic Party's official letters which contain veiled threats.

Yes.

One thing is the RNC is planning ahead.

I'd like to think that too. I hope you're right.

And a veiled threat to trample on ABC's First Amendment rights is not an actual trampling. If the Dems were to follow-through on their threats (which I don't think they have the ability to do), that would be a trampling.

259 posted on 09/09/2006 11:26:47 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

It is NOT being cut, trust me.


260 posted on 09/09/2006 11:27:03 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

When we do get OBL and GWB is president the Dems will curse that day because it will damage them badly.


261 posted on 09/09/2006 11:27:25 AM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

I'd like to think that, but the Bush White House has been engaged in a rope-a-dope strategy for about six years.


262 posted on 09/09/2006 11:27:33 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

He should be off "fighting" his STDs or hurricanes

There, fixed it for ya.


263 posted on 09/09/2006 11:28:23 AM PDT by hardworking (Comrades Clinton - protecting you from 'unapproved' information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Bing-bing-bing! We have a winner.


264 posted on 09/09/2006 11:28:37 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: hardworking

Thank you. That's better.


265 posted on 09/09/2006 11:31:02 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Socialism/Communism is not "progressive." It dates back to the Neanderthals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: varmintxer

Ok, one more guess. Winthrop Rockefeller?


266 posted on 09/09/2006 11:32:00 AM PDT by fruitintheroom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Yeh..you are right...but look at all the garbage and crap the Left has thrown at Bush.... yet he is a 2 term president. He may be battered and bruised but he aint broken...and neither are we...Fight on my friend(s).
This battle is ours to win...and win we will.


267 posted on 09/09/2006 11:32:17 AM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Pull it and replace it with the Best Of Leterman - the Monica jokes

How insulting! Can't we at least have Leno? Jeez!


268 posted on 09/09/2006 11:32:49 AM PDT by hardworking (Comrades Clinton - protecting you from 'unapproved' information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: hardworking

on another thread someone said it was reported the film is in the can, andwill be run


269 posted on 09/09/2006 11:33:29 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

I certainly hope so...no matter who is president. But, I'd like for posterity's sake it to be GWB because I think he truly has America's best interest at heart, regardless of how screwed up I think he is on immigration and turning the other cheek to the RATs...


270 posted on 09/09/2006 11:34:01 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I think they may have gone too far, now. Editing is one thing, screwing up their post-Labor-Day schedule is quite another.


271 posted on 09/09/2006 11:35:48 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove

Seriously, like you, I am hoping you are correct and that, at last, some little bit of justice is being metted out to the scumbag and his lesbian sidekick. However, unlike you, I am not at all confident that ABC will not cave in at the last minute and either not air the series at all, or edit it so severly that it ends up as a three-four hour short subject. Let's hope you are right.


272 posted on 09/09/2006 11:38:01 AM PDT by hardworking (Comrades Clinton - protecting you from information they have not approved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I've read all the comments, all the threads over the past few days, watched the Clinton Syndicate do their usual feigned-outrage bit, and seen ABC's cryptic responses to this controversy, and this is the way I think it will play out:

ABC may make a few edits to the final cut, but the film will basically show that both the Clinton Administration and that of Bush's dropped the ball leading up to 9/11. Because of the orchestrated hissy-fit of the Clinton Syndicate, when viewers see a Clinton official deciding not to go after bin Laden, they'll conclude, "Oh, these are the things that are made up," because they've been conditioned to do so by Clinton's careful propaganda campaign of the past few days. When they see Richard Clarke's version of Bush's White House dropping the ball, viewers will think, "Bush really blew it," and they'll think that because Republicans and the White House haven't piped up about the film, so viewers will assume that whatever hit the film levels against Bush must be true.

BTW, another point: This film has been in production for months, and it's only the last few days before it's to be aired that the Clintons and the Democrats have launched their preemptive strike. Why is that? It's because had the Clintons complained months ago, the intended impact of their campaign would have worn off before the film was aired. And the intended impact is to innoculate viewers by building up the segments on Clinton such that when viewers actually see the film, they'll conclude, "What's the big deal?", and ultimately, more people will come away thinking 9/11 was "Bush's fault."

273 posted on 09/09/2006 11:39:30 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
on another thread someone said it was reported the film is in the can, andwill be run

Even if they are editing, they are doing the final touches. It would take a month to change 5 to 10 minutes of film.

This is going on and uncut except for a disclaimer at the beginning of each segment.

You can't BUY this kind of buzz -- the more "controversial" the better. ABC may be part of the MSM and therefore part of the DNC propaganda machine. But they are also typical Lefties -- principles until it is YOUR ox being gored. If they cut it the way Clinton wants no one will watch after the first segment.

Trust me, I know how the Biz works.

274 posted on 09/09/2006 11:40:01 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

I can't argue with that. Good point.


275 posted on 09/09/2006 11:40:59 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: hardworking

Monica's actual testimony to the Grand Jury:

Q: It seems like an obvious question, but I have to ask it. Did the President ever have telephone calls while you were actually engaging with oral sex with him?

A: Twice.

Q: And when those telephone calls occurred, did he ever talk on the phone while you were performing oral sex?

A: Yes.

Q: Do you have any recollection about when those occurred?

A: I believe one was November 15, 1995, in my second visit with him, and I know April 7, 1996.

Maybe we should make a TV movie of those hearings and see what Bruce Lindsay has to say about it.


276 posted on 09/09/2006 11:41:39 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Ditto.


277 posted on 09/09/2006 11:41:51 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

Not only that, but their terrorism failures and misdeeds are receiving much more attention now than if they had just ignored the whole thing.


278 posted on 09/09/2006 11:44:08 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BigDaddyTX

Thanks for the info on Scholastic. I just received material for a subscription for my grandchildren. Think I'll send it back to Mr. Robinson ,personally, with a note.


279 posted on 09/09/2006 11:44:44 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fruitintheroom

This is not my theory, I'm just passing on what I heard on Medved, which he thought was very possible.

JFK.


280 posted on 09/09/2006 11:44:50 AM PDT by Mr Cobol (You want to see who the "enemy within" is? Tune to ABCCBSNBCMSNBCCNNFOX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

She's culpable for sure.


281 posted on 09/09/2006 11:44:56 AM PDT by veronica (NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

She's culpable for sure.


282 posted on 09/09/2006 11:44:57 AM PDT by veronica (NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents; Gaffer; Joe 6-pack
Joe 6-pack has found the new edit (thanks Joe). It looks like I was wrong -- they had a chance to slip in a small "tweak." It is here

I heard the failure to take Osama scene has been re-shot and now shows Bill (played by Harrison Ford) and Hillary (Madonna) in black Ninja gear approaching bin-Laden's (Kobe Bryant) mountain hideaway in the dead of night when they receive a phone call from Bob Bennett (Raymond Burr) telling them that he has just received a subpoena for Clinton's DNA from Ken Starr (Montgomery Burns). On the verge of taking bin-Laden into custody, a teary-eyed Bill tells Hillary that even though getting bin-Laden would be the right thing to do and save lives in the long run, Bill's lifelong devotion to law and justice means they must drop the task at hand in order to comply immediately with the subpoena. After a tearful embrace where Bill tells Hillary how much he loves her, and how they'll get another chance to get bin-Laden once she's president, the clinton's reluctantly turn away from bin-Laden's lair, and dejectedly return to the US so that Bill can be persecuted in the House impeachment hearings by Henry Hyde (Carrol O'Connor.)

283 posted on 09/09/2006 11:46:40 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
This mini reportedly has Clarke's fingerprints all over it. In his self-absorbed world, everybody is stupid but him. I don't like him. He's somewhat fair compared to many, but in my opinion he spins toward the Democrats. I hated when he addressed the 9/11 families in a staged manner and did not call 9/11 an attack but rather a tragedy, with that choice of words implying USA government is 100% responsible (also coming right out and saying so).

On the other hand, accountability is a good thing and some changes definitely appropriate. But one of these is to become more hardnosed towards terrorists. Terrorists did this horribly immoral murderous thing, and are trying to do more. Clarke's implication seems to be that the USA government must play perfect defense. It is impossible. We have to take the fight to the terrorists, and there must be worldwide unmuted moral outrage at their acts.

284 posted on 09/09/2006 11:49:55 AM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Dear Bob,

Your papers have not been approved.


Zieg Heil,

Bruce R. Lindsey Chief Executive Officer William J. Clinton Foundation

Douglas J. Band Counselor to President Clinton Office of William Jefferson Clinton


285 posted on 09/09/2006 11:50:37 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Democrats. French, but more cowardly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I heard the failure to take Osama scene has been re-shot and now shows Bill (played by Harrison Ford) and Hillary (Madonna) in black Ninja gear approaching bin-Laden's (Kobe Bryant) mountain hideaway in the dead of night when they receive a phone call from Bob Bennett (Raymond Burr) telling them that he has just received a subpoena for Clinton's DNA from Ken Starr (Montgomery Burns). On the verge of taking bin-Laden into custody, a teary-eyed Bill tells Hillary that even though getting bin-Laden would be the right thing to do and save lives in the long run, Bill's lifelong devotion to law and justice means they must drop the task at hand in order to comply immediately with the subpoena. After a tearful embrace where Bill tells Hillary how much he loves her, and how they'll get another chance to get bin-Laden once she's president, the clinton's reluctantly turn away from bin-Laden's lair, and dejectedly return to the US so that Bill can be persecuted in the House impeachment hearings by Henry Hyde (Carrol O'Connor.)

Simply hilarious!!

286 posted on 09/09/2006 11:51:54 AM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy; Joe 6-pack
Simply hilarious!!

If I knew how, I would submit this for Post of the Year (Thread of the Year belongs to Behind the Scenes of a ZOT!)

287 posted on 09/09/2006 11:54:06 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

But it seems the Clintonistas will appear to risk all credibility and even legality to get their wishes

You must remember that this is what the left defines as 'tough' because 'the end justifies the means' is the song to which they march.


288 posted on 09/09/2006 11:56:28 AM PDT by hardworking (Comrades Clinton - protecting you from information they have not approved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
This Democrapic thug (aka Rahm Emanuel) is right up there with Lindsey in terms of attack dog status.


289 posted on 09/09/2006 11:57:13 AM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Why are the Democrats so concerned about this movie? It's simple. The Democratic strategy to regain control of the House and Senate is to portray the Bush Administration as incompetent in foreign and security affairs because we're still in Iraq. However, this movie reminds people that the Democrats were equally or more incompetent.


290 posted on 09/09/2006 11:57:17 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: varmintxer

Nah, that seems highly implausible. What would JFK be doing hanging around whore-houses in Hot Springs, Arkansas?

Either Sen. Fullbright or Gov. Rockefeller would be much more likely candidates for the evil deed. Either one could easily have provided all connections/money necessary to groom 'The Stainer' through his warped and grifting life. I'm leaning toward Rockefeller now that I think more about it.


291 posted on 09/09/2006 11:58:35 AM PDT by fruitintheroom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

If ABC was smart, they would replace the content in question with commentary explaining why it's missing, and a 30 second add for George W. Bush.


292 posted on 09/09/2006 12:00:20 PM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trajan88

Agreed Rahm Emanuel is a Clinton attack dog but he gets to do the more above board "public communicatons" work that keeps his hands clean so he can be awarded his reward of a congressional seat among other things.

Lindsey gets down in the gutter and leads the thug activities. He's the one who will send someone to your house and warn you about the bad things that may happen to you and disappear your family pets and the like.

They are both scum, through and through. Emanuel was rumored to be serving a foreign intelligence agency but I've never seen any substance to those charges.

All the same, they are both beneath contempt.


293 posted on 09/09/2006 12:02:05 PM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

This on the same day that Rockafeller spews out the Dem's own revision of the 9/11 commission report - that trashes the original findings; two days before the anniversary.


294 posted on 09/09/2006 12:03:27 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

We can all see that this reaction is a naked misuse of power by the Dems. Why hasn't ANY republican member of congress or the senate come out and state that?
For crying out loud, they threatened the license of a broadcaster if they don't censor a TV program.
Why are they silent while the Dems dominate this?
Is it a case of not "disturbing the enemy while they making mistakes" or are they just afraid?

I would like someone of some authority to say something about this to counter the Howard Dean and Harry Reid threats..


295 posted on 09/09/2006 12:07:28 PM PDT by newnhdad (All your government branches are belong to us!! not for long if this cr@p keeps up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

All the DEMONS aren't screaming! Anyone notice the silence from Hillary!


296 posted on 09/09/2006 12:09:41 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Always Independent
Hillary only calls "co-president" when it benefits her.
297 posted on 09/09/2006 12:11:11 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

Thanks, but it took me awhile to figure out how to organize as little as I do. Some of the things I've found: My browser home page is home-made; it has links to pages, not only at FRee Republic and others on the web, but to PAGES ON MY OWN HARD DRIVE which I use a lot. I use a web page editor to constantly update SOME of those pages with personal reminders and with lists of things which are related to each other. Sometimes I put reminders in a new email which I DON'T send, I just put them in my "drafts" folder for later use.

Just offering a few ideas; I think maybe "jealousy" is just a desire to emulate, in this case, to learn how to organize, baby steps first.


298 posted on 09/09/2006 12:11:17 PM PDT by FreeKeys ("Everything you learn you will some day teach. So practice applying ever-greater clarity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

. . . "is all too clear" . . . but, who can possibly know what Clinton's people mean by that since it ALL depends on what the meaning of "is" is . . .?


299 posted on 09/09/2006 12:13:41 PM PDT by Twinkie (Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruitintheroom

It's Fullbright. In his elderly years he would have loved every move the Klinton Co. ever made.


300 posted on 09/09/2006 12:13:45 PM PDT by oyez (The way to punish a providence is to allow it to be governed by philosophers. --Frederick the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350 ... 401-405 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson