Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'The Path to 9/11' Annotated: CLIPS, SYNOPSIS, THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS, THE CLINTON JACKBOOT
ABC via redstate.org ^ | 9.10.06 | Mia T, redstate.org

Posted on 09/10/2006 6:10:36 AM PDT by Mia T

'The Path to 9/11' Annotated:
CLIPS, SYNOPSIS, THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS, THE CLINTON JACKBOOT

annotated by Mia T, 9.10.06
(clips, synopses from
Redstate.org)



he islamofascist terrorists declared war on America and committed acts of war against America when BILL CLINTON was president of America.

But bill clinton IGNORED the declarations and acts of war because he is a coward and because crushing the muslim terrorists didn't comport with his personal goals.

This self-absorbed postmodern blight on America thought he could perform his usual deconstructionist sleight of hand, fool the people and define away the threat ("It all depends on what the meaning of the word 'war' is."), not understanding this simple calculus: a terrorist war requires only one consenting player.

We would have to be out-of-our-minds suicidal to put the clintons back in the Oval Office. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset,

or was it something even more threatening to our national security?

by Mia T, 8.18.05


thanx to jla and Wolverine for the audio




NOTE:

It is clear the clintons did not want to kill bin Laden.
What should be becoming increasingly clear is that the clintons did not even want to capture bin Laden.
READ MORE
here:

'The Path to 9/11':
CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF

 
(Will be posting additional information about this soon....)

 


 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE



CLIP ONE

Against a barren central Asian landscape, an American special action
team moves in for a "snatch" operation on Osama bin Laden. But back
in Washington, DC, Clinton's National Security Advisor cannot bring
himself to make the final call.

CLIP TWO

The Americans and their local allies are stunned to find themselves
countermanded by the Clinton Administration at the moment of
decision. Frustrated and alone in a hostile land, they contemplate a
needless failure as their Afghan allies reproach them. Back in
Washington, DC, Bill Clinton becomes less preoccupied with American
security, and more preoccupied with his impending impeachment. Out
in east Africa, al Qaeda plots its next move.

CLIP THREE

In Nairobi, Kenya, horrific slaughter ensues as al Qaeda attacks the
American embassy. Clinton's DCI receives a teary remonstrance from
the only sane person in the entire American intelligence hierarchy in
those days.

CLIP FOUR

A team of Americans and Kenyans tracks a reluctant jihadi through a
Nairobi slum. A chase ensues, and the fugitive is caught. "American
devil!" he yells in Arabic, but one assumes real devils wouldn't take
prisoners. A threatening crowd of slum-dwellers gathers, toting
machetes, but the Americans escape. Back in DC, bureaucrats and the
NSA discuss how the Lewinsky investigation is hampering the
President's efforts. Madeleine Albright argues against taking on the
Taliban on purely legalistic grounds. William Cohen opines that
going to war is an "overreaction." The clown carnival plans its
infamously ineffectual cruise-missile strikes on Afghanistan and the
Sudan. The Sudanese are predictably irate.

CLIP FIVE

The Sudanese express their anger at America by trashing their own
neighborhoods. Ayman al-Zawahiri calls ABC News for a friendly
chat. Massoud's Northern Alliance suffers a Taliban offensive in
response to the American strikes. Massoud himself is piqued: why did
the Americans ever trust the perfidious Pakistanis whose forewarning
saved bin Laden? Thank God we've learned that lesson. George Tenet,
Sandy Berger and Madeleine Albright exchange harsh words.

CLIP SIX

Khalid Sheikh Muhammed: champion offroader! And hideous villain, too
-- the man has it all. We see an al Qaeda training camp in
operation. It's like the Boy Scouts, but with automatic weapons,
none of the Christian overtones, and twice the recreational sodomy.
KSM reveals he has a secret plan in mind. He calls it "The Planes
Operation." It involves....planes. As dusk falls, the jihadis
machine-gun a projection screen upon which Clinton's visage is
speaking, thereby eliminating the sole source of entertainment in
Waziristan, and disrespecting their own MVP. KSM and al-Zawahiri
exchange tender words. Much desert scenery and ululating ensues.

ABC's "Path to 9/11": The Video Democrats DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE

 Part 1 of 6 http://www.traditionalvalues.org/clinton_abc.html
http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58750/video.mov/17926




Part 2 of 6
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/clinton_abc2.html
http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58751/video.mov/17926




Part 3 of 6
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/clinton_abc3.html
http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58753/video.mov/17926




Part 4 of 6
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/clinton_abc4.html
http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58756/video.mov/17926




Part 5 of 6
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/clinton_abc5.html
http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58763/video.mov/17926




Part 6 of 6
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/clinton_abc6.html
http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58767/video.mov/17926





 

 

WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
(Part One)




THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON part one




UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."




CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)




'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)
by Mia t, 2.13.06





ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE
(and doesn't even know it)
by Mia T, 4.28.06


ALBRIGHT
1: 'Bin Laden and his Network Declared War2 on the United States and Struck First and We Have Suffered Deeply'

 


WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?



IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY


BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."


ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE (and doesn't even know it)



MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)


'The Path to 9/11':
CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF


WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)


'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)


THE (oops!) INADVERTENT (TERRORISM) ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)


HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR
PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON



THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY
(DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie


AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS
(BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)


CARVILLE AGITPROP + THE CLINTON JACKBOOT
'THE POWER OF HILLARY': THE TITLE



SUSAN ESTRICH ON "DREDGING UP" THE RAPE OF JUANITA BROADDRICK + "ALL THAT OLD CLINTON STUFF"


THE INCONVENIENT TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON
(FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU. FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME.)


ON PEGGY NOONAN ON HILLARY CLINTON SENDING MEN TO WAR
(IT RUNS IN THE FAMILY)



QUID PRO COAL2:
CLINTON CORRUPTION + THE SEQUESTRATION OF GASEOUS FOSSILS
(HILLARY DOES COAL AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB)



PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA


Carpe Mañana: The (bill + hillary) clinton Terrorism Policy
('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')



CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES5


sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)


CLINTON TREASON + THE GORELICK WALL


Reverse Gorelick


THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans


CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)


pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA



The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)


IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)



PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON
WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES


'MISBEGOTTEN' TIMES
(NARROWNESS, MR. SULZBERGER, NOT WIDTH)


WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES

MORE





'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
THE ADDRESS
THE (oops!) TRUTH


"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war....

But sometimes we would have these debates where people would say, if I didn't take some military action this very day, people would look down their nose at America and think we were weak.  And I always thought of Senator Fulbright.... 6

So anytime somebody said in my presence, 'Hey, if you don't do this, people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' 

I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow?  If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak.... 1

I learned that as a 20-year-old kid watching Bill Fulbright.  Listening."

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

 

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.

We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer




"I remember exactly what happened. Bruce Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My God, a second plane has hit the tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.' that's the first thing I said. He said, 'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because only bin Laden and the Iranians could set up the network to do this and they [the Iranians] wouldn't do it because they have a country in targets. Bin Laden did it.'

I thought that my virtual obsession 2 with him was well placed and I was full of regret that I didn't get him."

bill clinton
Sunday, Sept 3, 2002
Larry King Live



"You know... the job which we should have done 1... which should have been our primary focus, to find [you know] bin Laden and eliminate al Qaeda."

hillary clinton
Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA

... I thank you for this award, even though, in general, I think former presidents and presidents should never get awards.  I was delighted when Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize because I thought he earned it, and I thought it was great because he got it as much for what he did after office as when he was in office.  In general, I think that the fact that we got to be president is quite honor enough.

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

"Bill Clinton is still campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize. But for now, he'll just have to settle for "the political play of the week."

Bill Schneider
CNN
reporting on the Fulbright Prize
April 14, 2006

 

 

 

WASHINGTON -- Two Norwegian public-relations executives and one member of the Norwegian Parliament say they were contacted by the White House to help campaign for President Clinton to receive this year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work in trying to negotiate peace in the Middle East.

Clinton Lobbies for Nobel Prize: What a Punk
White House Lobbied For Clinton Nobel Peace Prize Updated
Friday, October 13, 2000
By Rita Cosby

 

 

 

There's been speculation in the last few months that Clinton was pursuing a Mideast peace accord in an effort to win the prize and secure his legacy as president.

AIDES PUSH CLINTON FOR THE NOBEL

 


 

 

At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.

Mia T
Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers


 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE








COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abc; albright; berger; billclinton; binladen; dysfunction; elections; fifthanniversary; gorelick; gorelickwall; gwot; hillary; hillary08; hillaryclinton; islam; islamofascists; jihad; muslims; nobelpeaceprize; osamabinladen; pathto911; sandyberger; sedition; terror; terrorism; theterrorismstupid; treason; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2006 6:10:41 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

This link appears to work a little faster. It provides a synopsis of each of the 6 clips and you can pick one at a time...

http://www.redstate.com/blogs/krempasky/2006/sep/09/abcs_path_to_9_11_clip_synopsis


2 posted on 09/10/2006 6:16:30 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Excellent presentation!

I will never forget how I felt that awful day on 9-11
I still tremble when I think of it.


3 posted on 09/10/2006 6:17:04 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand

perhaps you can repost your insightful analysis here....


4 posted on 09/10/2006 6:17:07 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
I expected the Dem's to demand that Path be pulled. Look how they tried to smash free speech when the Swifties came out against John Forbes Scary !
5 posted on 09/10/2006 6:20:16 AM PDT by Tinman73 (Human nature requires We forget the terrible things We see. A truly intelligent person remembers it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Another great collection of the damning errors and omissions by the Clinton administration. Thanks!


6 posted on 09/10/2006 6:27:00 AM PDT by NautiNurse (Katherine Harris for U.S. Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Photoshop this:

The angrier clinton is, the more outrageous his lie.


7 posted on 09/10/2006 6:41:43 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

thanx :)


8 posted on 09/10/2006 6:46:28 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stopem

thank you :)


9 posted on 09/10/2006 6:47:02 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

thx :)


10 posted on 09/10/2006 6:47:33 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

indeed


11 posted on 09/10/2006 6:48:18 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

thanks for the clips :)


12 posted on 09/10/2006 6:54:41 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; yoe; YaYa123; IVote2; ...

ping


13 posted on 09/10/2006 6:55:06 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: malia

ping


14 posted on 09/10/2006 7:06:24 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia T. Bump


15 posted on 09/10/2006 7:12:50 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

ping


16 posted on 09/10/2006 7:13:06 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

thx :)


17 posted on 09/10/2006 7:13:52 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; All

.


Danger, WILL ROBINSON, Danger.


The Shadow Party: FrontPage Interviews Co-Author RICHARD POE

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1692140/posts


.


18 posted on 09/10/2006 7:29:33 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

Thanks, Ronnie. :)


19 posted on 09/10/2006 8:01:38 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; All
Bump.
 
Perfect work, Mia ...as always!
 
Everyone should see this. It is currently airing in Missouri (ABC TV)
VIEW THE VIDEO ONLINE

20 posted on 09/10/2006 8:03:48 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

thanx again, Wolverine. :)


21 posted on 09/10/2006 8:27:45 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

So are these clips still in the movie? I guess we have to watch and see tonight.


22 posted on 09/10/2006 8:37:21 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Marvelous as usual! Buzz Patterson says the story line is mostly accurate - and since it follows his "Dereliction of Duty" I'll have to go with that. Thanks for the Clinton up-date - I think it is all too marvelous that the Clinton's (I say both as Hillary's hand prints are all over the failed attempt) tried to stop ABC just as Kerry tried to stop the Swift Boat story.


23 posted on 09/10/2006 8:51:16 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


24 posted on 09/10/2006 9:09:43 AM PDT by JamminJAY (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

thx yoe. :)

Marvelous indeed.
The clintons bared...
and it ain't pretty.


25 posted on 09/10/2006 9:22:35 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

don't know. we shall see.


26 posted on 09/10/2006 9:23:41 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Prior to 9/11 any idiot presumably could have gone to a large public place, a subway, a mall, a convention center, and with some sort of homemade device, killed a few thousand people. Indeed, an idiot, Mr. McVay appears to have done close to that in Oklahoma in 1998 (although there are inadequately investigated indications a middle eastern involvment may have existed). One of the things that makes 9/11 significant is the manner in which the assault was undertaken and the damage done to the non-human targets. The symbolism of America's engineering and financial greatness turned to wreakage in minutes by the perverse science fiction like simultaneous takeover of multiple passenger aircraft, was an assault not only on Americans but also on the American psyche.

It is reported that airline company employees were uncomfortable with middle easterners, paying cash for one way tickets and carrying no baggage on the morning of 9/11. In a normal world, in a Norman Rockwell or Samuel Clemons America that would have been enough to prevent the full catastrophe. Even Barney Fife would have held the suspicious characters for questioning long enough to defeat the plot. But by 2001 America was already living in a world created by the likes of Jamie Gorelick and Hillary Clinton, quintissential 1960's leftists that the reformed David Horowitz for one has been warning us about for years.

Through their persistent strategy of a "thousand cuts" including by institutionalized "political correctness" backed by lawsuit awards for "discrimination" and other subjective horrors, the 60's leftists had paralized the American spirit more successfully than the most lethal snake toxin. From the Pilot School owner who called the FBI, from the investigators who tried to warn the FBI and Justice Departments, down to the last minute of the last day, as helpless airline employees sensing something was wrong (not to mention the actor who reported strange passenger behavior days before during their dry run)were compelled to stand by and do nothing because of a thousand culturally imbeded Gorelick walls these same leftists, in a confused and delusional faith, combined with disdain for humanity, not unlike that of the terrorists themselves, had finally constructed a free passageway for wide scale pathological antisocial acts to go unrestrained resulting in a scale of massive disaster most Americans could never before then have envisioned being possible.

We should not forget where these policies began. They began when the United Nations was formed and the implicit principal that US policy should be influenced by "world opinion". They began when the US courts decided that well established police power must be restrained by ambiguous and senseless judicial conceptions of abstract reasonableness. They began when courts refused to deal with criminals who could find procedural errors in police or prosecutorial methods. They began when organized lawlessness and mayhem in American cities were not responded to by public authority and were excused by American intellectuals. They began when student lawlessness was similiarly unopposed and allowed to redefine the requirements of scholarship as well as the margins of civilized conduct. They exploded when the left gained the critical mass to enable an entirely unnecessary political defeat in Vietnam and stage a political coup (driving from power a president elected by a massive majority) over trivialities magnified by the political power vested in a congressional opposition. (Ms. Clinton of course was an eager and direct participant in the charade).

In a direct line from the Boland Amendment and the Church committee, clear products of the ugly smear of an historically great presidency by those who were envious of his achievements, the Gorelick wall and the thousand impositions on the normal life of Americans, distorting judgment and restraining rational self preservation driven actions, the morning of 9/11 (including the disarming of airline pilots which had been accomplished counter to the accepted practice of post WWII flyers who entered the profession out of combat) presented no obstacles to the sick minded terrorists, until the passengers on flight 93 learned enough to grasp what horror was unfolding around them.

The point is simply that on September 11, 2001, the 1960's leftist politicians, intellectuals, professors, lawyers, judges, and newspeople had succeeded in remaking America into their vision of a stale utopia, sufficient at least to render America defenseless, not because the terrorists were smart, but because the leftists made it easy for them through institutionalized nitpicking over perverse abstractions and demented notions of equality/justice including a deliberately skewed and seriously flawed immigration policies advanced in particular by the likes of Ted Kennedy and Jay Rockefeller twin examples of human flotsam made important by inheritence and arrogance (at least J.D Rock the first, made his money honestly, though).

The Clintons, poster children of the Left, acceded to power in 1992, via the Yale-Arkansas pedigre, both without credentials outside politics, through the complicity of a corrupt media and through the historical anomoly of Ross Perot's candidacy. The were never elected by majority of Americans. History will ultimately conclude that in the critical post cold war period (New World Order) this fluke of political fortune cast Americas future into the hands of an incompetent, self absorbed, mentally disturbed, perversely wicked, corrupt (I learned how to trade cattle futures by reading the wall street journal)couple. It is entirely appropriate that these two disdain Marriage. For their partnership is surely not a marriage in any normal sense. Their sadistic bond inexorably linked in their psyches with their views of governance (Gorelick Wall) and their instinctive willingness to employ flagrant vindictiveness to suppress or punish their "enemies", threatens again to distort normal political processes by interferring with a 40 MM dollar production set to be broadcast by one of their long time allies. Clearly, truth is a massive embarrassment to the Clintons and their ongoing ambitions.

One hopes only, that after all we have been through, and with this additional specticle of committed leftists threatening with every lever of power they can command or bluff, to chill free political expression (the left's sacred McCarthysm) that a majority of Americans will wake up from the stupor of Clinton toxic venoms and recapture the essentially American virtues of self defense, self preservation, and disdain for those who preach inaction in the face of evil, or consensus when every American breath can feel and smell the need for Victory.

President Bushes only significant error in fighting the war against the forces that killed Americans and toppled our national symbols on 9/11 has been his timerity in following his instincts and his tolerance for delays and mitigation of efforts and goals in deference to his political opponents and half hearted allies. Just as the jihadists knew there was more to be done than merely kill Americans, ie they knew they had to target symbols of our greatness to damage America, so too America, must bring down symbols of the power of the jihadists with massive and spectacular defeats of the sources of their power. By way of example I am quite in favor of every mosque and congregation of every wahabist or similiar leaning Imam being obliterated in a simultaneous attack during services throughout any area, territory or country that has evoked militant hostility to the U.S. or its citizens, unless such Imams have specifically and publically condemed terrorist violence. Alternatively, I think the time has come to consider a simultaneous tactical nuclear strike on every suspected Iraninan nuclear site along with a similar attack on their parliment when in session at the same time, ie. it is time to show the jihadists what a coordinated attack really looks like.

The world may well feign hatred if the US takes these kinds of actions. On the other hand Europe will be relieved as always by US action, and the price of oil will tumble. If my suggested methods are too crude, then I invite our government to polish and refine any plan that results in a devastating blow to the jihadists. Nothing wrong with bringing democracy to Iraq and the broader middle east for example, however, it is a mistake to leave the end in doubt, even for a minute.

The American people will never, by a majority, elect a Clinton who opposed Bush, if Bush will bring us Victory. If he cant bring Victory, anyone eventually will be able to be his party's designated successor.


27 posted on 09/10/2006 9:29:54 AM PDT by Gail Wynand (Power is only proportionate when it is sufficient to overcome the aggressor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; All

thank you.

MUST-READ bump!


28 posted on 09/10/2006 9:33:31 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JamminJAY

thanx :)


29 posted on 09/10/2006 9:34:39 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thanks...blessings to you.


30 posted on 09/10/2006 9:40:19 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible; All
Just watched 'The Path to 9/11'
September 10, 2006 | myself

Posted on 09/10/2006 9:28:09 AM EDT by Byron_the_Aussie

Part one shown on Australian TV this evening.

Don't miss it, my Freeper friends. It's no wonder the Clintonistas have thrown everything at ABC/Disney, in a desperate effort to have the miniseries cancelled. Documents exactly what we've been following over the years on FR. Brave agents on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Dedicated people at Langley and the J. Edgar Hoover building, working around the clock to capture or kill Bin Laden, Ramzi Yusef et al. And all their efforts derailed by Clinton appointees like Berger and Allbright- selfishly putting their own careers (and covering their asses) before protecting the USA. The line of the show delivered by the actor playing Masood, brave and charismatic leader of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan:

...are there any men left in Washington? Or are they all cowards?....

Take the phone off the hook, and don't miss it. All the best, Byron


31 posted on 09/10/2006 9:40:31 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: shield

thank you :)


32 posted on 09/10/2006 9:41:08 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

I think those links are overloading as well. I saw the first 3, but now they're all unavailable. Thanks for posting it, I have an excellent idea about the last 3.


33 posted on 09/10/2006 10:25:16 AM PDT by Fudd Fan ("The purpose of the UN is to ensure that the U.S. never wins another war." -HonestConservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
I think those links are overloading as well. I saw the first 3, but now they're all unavailable. Thanks for posting it, I have an excellent idea about the last 3.

The first three were the best.

34 posted on 09/10/2006 11:08:35 AM PDT by MaestroLC ("Let him who wants peace prepare for war."--Vegetius, A.D. Forth Century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

Well #5 was pretty damning.
I found all the links on the following thread, post #362:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1698800/posts?q=1&&page=301


35 posted on 09/10/2006 11:54:50 AM PDT by Fudd Fan ("The purpose of the UN is to ensure that the U.S. never wins another war." -HonestConservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; Mia T

For someone who thinks like we do, ping to #27. Invited to post comments by another of our loyal American conservatives, Mia T.


36 posted on 09/10/2006 6:34:37 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I watched all 6 edited seans and was curious if albright did inform Pakistan about the incoming attack could she not be brought up on treason charges knowing that the Pakies were very close to the talaban?
37 posted on 09/10/2006 11:09:31 PM PDT by John 6.66=Mark of the Beast?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; Mia T
Thank you both for your tireless efforts in keeping the real Clinton legacy alive.

You buy one, you get the second for free. Bought crap and free crap...what a bargain the Clintons turned out to be..../sarc.
38 posted on 09/10/2006 11:27:07 PM PDT by hummingbird (Bloggers killed the Media Stars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Thank you.

Mia is the tireless, talented genius documenting the true Clinton legacy/threat of corruption and pathological perverssion.

I am merely a citizen occasionally inspired to voice my disgust with the political Left, which includes the MSM, the democrat party, university professors, and union thugs. They elected Clinton, kept him in power, and have whitewashed his and her misfeasence malfeasence and non feasence, and continually defamed Bush and sabotaged our war effort, all in the name of trying to regain power for powers sake.

The Clinton legacy of corruption has put Americas future at risk. We must expose the Left for the depraved, treacherous, slugs that they are, or we will lose America.


39 posted on 09/11/2006 2:23:33 AM PDT by Gail Wynand (Power is only proportionate when it is sufficient to overcome the aggressor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; Czar; Mia T; Minuteman23
Czar, many thanks for the ping.

Mia, your research is impeccable, and your commentary is among the most powerful on this forum. This post is no exception. You are a treasure!

GW, the brilliance of your essay in post 27 is far above my poor power to add or detract. :) There is not a word with which I disagree, or anything that I would add. You have said it all … and you’ve said it with incomparable insight and eloquence. Thank you!

I am quite in favor of every mosque and congregation of every wahabist or similiar leaning Imam being obliterated in a simultaneous attack during services throughout any area, territory or country that has evoked militant hostility to the U.S. or its citizens, unless such Imams have specifically and publically condemed terrorist violence. Alternatively, I think the time has come to consider a simultaneous tactical nuclear strike on every suspected Iraninan nuclear site along with a similar attack on their parliment when in session at the same time, ie. it is time to show the jihadists what a coordinated attack really looks like. ... deserves constant, drumbeat repetition.

On a semi-related topic (having found nowhere else to post this, I’ll do it here :) ... We are finding ourselves bombarded with 9/11 memorial tributes over these twenty-four hours, but I can’t help but wonder whether most of us are too often compartmentalizing the repercussions of that fateful day – not allowing them to penetrate and permeate our lives as deeply as they must, for us to have a strong enough grasp on the threat that we are facing.

To help us along that self-destructive road, there has existed a self-imposed media moratorium on showing more than a smattering of the horrific pictures, videos and accounts of the holocaust of 9/11 over the five years that have elapsed since (with the exception of today). And a similar moratorium has been placed on the showing of equally horrific images of, or making anything but passing reference to, beheadings, burnings, dismemberments, etc. that have occurred in Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries in which terrorists have been doing what they do best.

I believe I watch television news reports as much as, and probably more than, the average American, and I only once saw pictures of an frenzied mob, consisting of Iraqi men, women and children, dragging the charred, dismembered bodies of the four American contractors through the streets of Fallujah early on in the war, two of whose barely-recognizable-as-human remains were hung from a bridge over the Euphrates. Seeing that video caused a head-to-toe, visible chill the likes of which I have never before experienced. And just that one viewing has caused the image to be forever emblazoned in my memory.

The kidnapping and brutal murder of British C.A.R.E. worker, Margaret Hassan, illustrates this media moratorium as well. To this day, authorities are not certain whether Hassan is the woman whose body was discovered on a street outside of Baghdad with her legs and arms cut off and throat slit, or whether she was merely shot in the head by her captors. Whichever her fate, once it had been determined that she was no longer alive, her story disappeared from our television screens, as if it no longer merited investigation or our collective attention and remembrance.

Islamic terrorists perform such grisly rituals frequently, and with relish. But the mainstream American media have taken it upon themselves to decide that the American citizen is much too weak-kneed to anymore view, or focus for any length of time on, such atrocities. The media have become our sensitivity censors-by-proxy.

… a fact which would be slightly more palatable if we had not all been subject to weeks upon weeks of photos of a handful of aberrant American soldiers (who no doubt represent .00001% of Americans serving in the Middle East) ‘humiliating’ Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib, or rumors of incidents of American misconduct at Haditha.

My guess is that, were the average American subject to an equal amount of visual reminders and commentary regarding the genuine atrocities committed against freedom-loving people world-wide as they are the fabricated or magnified-out-of-realistic-proportion ‘atrocities’ committed by Americans, the generally short-attention-span mindset of the citizenry would be far more united and resolute in our war on Islamic fascism – perhaps even to the point of being outraged by the recent judicial ruling (among other countless outlandish offenses) outlawing effective intelligence procedures that have been proven to enhance our safety and security.

So why the media blackout? And, equally disturbing, why the media insistence on drumbeat repetitious reference to America’s warts?

My husband and I have seen three major media productions that purportedly attempt to portray the events of 9/11: Paul Greengass’s United 93, Oliver Stone’s World Trade Center, and the A&E made-for-television Flight 93. The first two were fairly well publicized, and the third received little if any fanfare.

United 93 was a dry, documentary-leaning depiction of the hijacking and eventual crash of United flight 93. It evoked little emotion, and we left the theater feeling as if we had just sat in on a college physics lecture.

World Trade Center was a soap opera depiction of the attack on the Twin Towers – a depiction of the courage and resolve of the first responders. But nowhere did it even remotely illustrate the vicious, sadistic, brutal, obsessive nature of the barbarians who caused the tragedy. Even the image of dozens of our countrymen plunging to their deaths was bastardized by the showing simply of a single rag doll-like figure falling lifelessly from a window. And the explanation that the focus of this movie was intended only to be fixed on the courage of the rescue workers falls on my deaf ears. One cannot purport to depict any major aspect of that tragic day without making reference to the subhuman nature of Islamic fascism that brought it about. To ignore the roll of the perpetrators amounts to purposefully dulling the sense of outrage that needs to be aroused.

In contrast, A&E’s Flight 93 is a godsend that every adult American, and every high school history class, must see. The movie does beautiful justice to a story whose accurate, meaningful telling seems next to impossible. In the viewing, we come to know (and know intimately) our countrymen who were aboard that ill-fated plane. We come to know their families. We feel the agony, anger, despair … and we applaud the courage. There is no soap-opera dialogue or phony Hollywood dramatics. And we see and experience what the madmen of this world, without conscience or compassion, have planned for those of us who do not come to embrace their beliefs.

Here is my point in all of this (if you’re still with me :) …

Shortly after seeing Flight 93, I heard Deena Burnett, the wife of Tom Burnett (who, along with, Todd Beamer, Jeremy Glick, Mark Bingham, and others, took it upon themselves to rush the cockpit), and author of Fighting Back: Living Beyond Ourselves, speak at Saint Mary’s College. She must have spoken for close to an hour. She is every bit as intelligent, eloquent, passionate, engaging, and humble as Todd Beamer’s wife, Lisa. And her account of the events of 9/11, as well as its effect on the families of those on board Flight 93, and its repercussions for our country, was mesmerizing. Every fact and recollection that she offered the audience was incredibly, and accurately, portrayed in Flight 93. I admire her immensely, as I do Lisa Beamer. And I applaud their courage, their faith, and their mission: (1) to awaken America to the importance of a knowledge of the nature of the enemy, (2) to underscore the need for preemption and preparedness, and (3) to remain strong in spite of our adversity.

After her talk, Mrs. Burnett was asked how often she speaks publicly. She responded that, with three young daughters who are her first priority, she limits her speaking engagements to only about four a year.

And yet, the room in which she spoke appeared to have a capacity of perhaps four hundred … and half of the seats were empty.

We cannot fault our government, our ivory-tower academics, and our media for all that ails us. Many of us disconnect from the events of 9/11, and don’t take them with us in our daily walk. We allow the powers that be to lull us into believing that the Duke Lacrosse rape case, or the continuing sagas of JonBenet Ramsey and Natalee Holloway, are somehow momentous events, more deserving of our attention than the daily atrocities perpetrated on innocents around the globe by madmen who grow more emboldened by our willingness to embrace programmed diversion and apathy.

Sometimes the most powerful truths can be found in the most simple of ideas: The winning of this war will depend entirely on whether we are more determined to preserve our liberty and sovereignty than they are determined to destroy them.

Doing the former will require not intermittent, but consistent, outrage and resolve. In order to maintain both, we must not allow the media to lull us into a sense of security, or allow ourselves to be diverted by bread-and-circus repetition of pointless drivel posing as news.

And we must not allow snake oil salesmen masquerading as public servants to preach their divisiveness, because they value the amassing of personal and ideological power more than they do the defeat of this historically unprecedented malevolence bent on the annihilation of the free world. A good segment of the American citizenry has been programmed to believe that 3,000 deaths on the battlefield during a three-year war is indicative of an un-winnable quagmire. I wonder how many among us are aware that, during the battle of the Somme in World War I, the British sacrificed more than 19,000 men in a single day.

We are allowing ourselves to be programmed into submission. We are being conditioned to be impatient, superficial and self-absorbed. And a people with the attention span of a field mouse, and the critical thinking ability of the same, doesn’t stand a prayer of defeating the most wicked force in the history of mankind.

At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio or make a track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time, or die by suicide ... Abraham Lincoln

~ joanie
Allegiance and Duty Betrayed

40 posted on 09/11/2006 10:24:32 AM PDT by joanie-f (If you believe that God is your co-pilot, it might be time to switch seats ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

Thanks for your support.

I enjoyed your essay. You make the key point...America has done a poor job of understanding, not to mention even identifying precisely, the nature of this enemy.

At their core this enemy is driven by the same perverse pathological disturbance that allowed an intelligent, modern society to plunge headlong into the business of mass extermination of innocents, world war, and eventual national self destruction (Third Reich). The Islamic Jihadists may be cluesless as to the formal political platform of 1930's Germany's National Socialists, and their inbred hatred of jews may even be coincidental to the Nazi's rather than directly adopted from Nazi propaganda, however, the fundamental motivations, and mechanisms of psychopathic hatred that fosters beheadings of relief workers, and incineration of innocent children and families, is exactly and precisely the same as that which stoked the gas chambers of a society led to madness by the deeply disturbed self hating Austrian loser turned Furher. (more to come on this subject in future posts).

Islamic societies are on the whole largely unproductive except for one thing, institutionalized blinding hatred of non-muslims, especially jews. From the slums of Gaza to coffee houses in Saudi Arabia, to jungle camps in Indonesia, there is a society that thrives on ruthless hatred and it comprises many 100's of millions of persons. It is the same sick hatred that bound together the perverse group of good fornothings that ran the Nazi party and left undealt with it will be throwing bombs in a bank, shopping mall or train near you. Its only a matter of time.


41 posted on 09/11/2006 11:24:05 AM PDT by Gail Wynand (If they werent resisting so hard, it would mean we had attacked the wrong place (Iraq).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; Gail Wynand; Mia T
Very pleased to see your post as well as your recognition of Mia T and Gail Wynand as the talented loyal American conservatives they so obviously are.

Your own comments, as is always the case, have further illuminated the terrorist issue for the benefit of all who frequent FR.

Prayers went up last night for all those who lost their lives and loved ones as a result of the outrage committed on 9/11 by the Muslim terrorist scum. Recalling that sad time, my demeanor today was mostly angry. Very angry.

It is good today to feel again that same rage I felt on 9/11. In the coming months, it will always be there, just under the surface, ready to be called up as circumstances warrant. In other words, this is not a good time for any more pious lectures about "the religion of peace" (TROP).

I'm not in the mood for it.

42 posted on 09/11/2006 1:54:01 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

You have the uncanny ability to get to the core of an issue and to make the reader connect dots that they might not otherwise connect. This is one of your best, Joanie. Thank you.

I will be ordering the DVD of "Flight 93."


43 posted on 09/11/2006 7:47:06 PM PDT by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand
Thank you. Your insight and eloquence are matched by your humility.

A comment regarding the impetus for The Gorelick Wall....

It is reported that airline company employees were uncomfortable with middle easterners, paying cash for one way tickets and carrying no baggage on the morning of 9/11. In a normal world, in a Norman Rockwell or Samuel Clemons America that would have been enough to prevent the full catastrophe. Even Barney Fife would have held the suspicious characters for questioning long enough to defeat the plot. But by 2001 America was already living in a world created by the likes of Jamie Gorelick and Hillary Clinton, quintissential 1960's leftists that the reformed David Horowitz for one has been warning us about for years.

Through their persistent strategy of a "thousand cuts" including by institutionalized "political correctness" backed by lawsuit awards for "discrimination" and other subjective horrors, the 60's leftists had paralized the American spirit more successfully than the most lethal snake toxin. From the Pilot School owner who called the FBI, from the investigators who tried to warn the FBI and Justice Departments, down to the last minute of the last day, as helpless airline employees sensing something was wrong (not to mention the actor who reported strange passenger behavior days before during their dry run)were compelled to stand by and do nothing because of a thousand culturally imbeded Gorelick walls these same leftists, in a confused and delusional faith, combined with disdain for humanity, not unlike that of the terrorists themselves, had finally constructed a free passageway for wide scale pathological antisocial acts to go unrestrained resulting in a scale of massive disaster most Americans could never before then have envisioned being possible.

--Gail Wynand

As I argued previously, (Reverse Gorelick, 4.15.04), we would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.

Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall.

Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism.

While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).

The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.

The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance



Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:

  • Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911
  • Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)

Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect....

The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.

Filegate and the clinton Putsch,
committed in tandem,
the product of a careful criminal calculus,
at once empowered clinton
and disemboweled his opponents.
clinton was now free to betray with abandon
not only our trust,
but the Constitution as well.

The Common Man
Mia T
February, 1998


Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support The-Wall-as- cover thesis.

Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)


44 posted on 09/11/2006 10:16:15 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: joanie-f

Thank you for your kindness... and for sharing your wonderful essay.

Several brief comments:

  1. The 9/11 ceremonies: Annual memorial tributes ad infinitum seem to me inappropriate in the case of the random victims of 9/11. And in the case of 9/11's true heroes, annual tributes are counterproductive. An almost ritualistic veneration of the terrorists' accomplishments--broadcast to the world, no less--serves most of all to fuel the terrorists.

  2. As for the power-hungry public servant (now there's an oxymoron for you) and the programmed, largely mindless, impatient, superficial and self-absorbed electorate, we must get rid of the former, (the professional pol is anathema to democracy), and since we cannot get rid of the latter, we must try to change the culture.

  3. United 93 was clipped, clinical, nonjudgmental but for its central thesis:

'UNITED 93' vs. 'MUNICH'
Paul Greengrass--thank the stars--is no Steven Spielberg

by Mia T, 5.09.06

 



hereas both 'United 93' and 'Munich' derive their initial tension not from uncertainty but from what we already know, one movie remains scrupulously true to the facts--art in the service of history--while the other quickly devolves into a verisimilitudinous contrivance in the service of a director's political agenda.

Paradoxically--poetic justice in its purest form, some would say--the honest movie is the one that ultimately delivers the powerful political message.

Spoken by its heros--our heros--as they prepare to rush the cockpit shortly before the plane meant for the White House plunges into a Pennsylvania field instead, the simple but powerful words are these:

  • "No one is going to help us. We've got to do it ourselves."
  • "We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."
UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."



CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)

by Mia T, 4.24.06




CLOSE ENCOUNTER OF THE WORST KIND
... to borrow a phrase, perversely, from a Spielberg flick about benign intelligence.

January 9, 2006
Reviewer: miat22 (Mia T)


Munich, with its false premises, phony pieties and outright lies -- Spielberg fantasy wrapped in sober documentary -- is a verisimilitudinous contrivance that is pernicious, especially now, especially here, especially if we understand Spielberg's real motivation.

Truth matters not at all to Spielberg, and courage matters even less. To advance his fallacious argument, he has Golda Meir speak words she never said, never would have said and, obviously, cannot now disavow. Posthumous misappropriation is a preferred tactic of the abject coward.

Munich is less about Meir avenging the Munich massacre than it is about Bush waging the War on Terror. The historical Munich allusion of appeasement, self-loathing and psychologizing that is practiced so fastidiously by the American Left
today is key to understanding Spielberg.

The core of his anti-war argument: By fighting back, we become our enemy. Ironically, with Munich, the same can now be said of Spielberg.

Is Spielberg humanizing the terrorist really any different from Riefenstahl humanizing Hitler? If anything, Spielberg is more contemptible. Whereas Riefenstahl symbolizes the naïve actress and director who is induced to deal with devils, Spielberg is self-actuated and aware.

Hollywood is DreamWorks, fantastical and unthinking and solipsistic by definition.

To mitigate its danger, people capable of critical thinking must take on Hollywood... and must do so in Hollywood venues.

The printed word, sad to say, no longer carries the day.



My New York Times Review of Munich
Was this review helpful to you?
VOTE
HERE


 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006


46 posted on 09/11/2006 11:57:02 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I see and understand your point.

I certainly agree that the staffing of the justice department was carefully controlled by HRC so that she could monitor and co-opt its operations at will.

I confess agnosticism as to the Clinton's thoughts and subjecive motives. e.g. I dont know if Hillary had Foster shot or merely had his body moved.

What concerns me is the inertia of the Baby Boom Left and their supporters. Unbenknownst to most Americans, they are a hairbreath away, under their doctrine of "human rights" of establishing international law, as binding precedent in the US and of subjecting US citizens to International jurisdiction. (It has to do with a doctrine they have been pushing based upon treaty interpretations if I remember correctly - US courts have accepted the doctrine, lefties are pushing to expand the scope of what it means).

Thus, in so many ways, Gorelick is consistent with everything else the Left, as illuminated by Horowitz has done since they graduated. Ever so marginal indirect chipping away at common sense and established norms, to establish and institutionalize their elitism of the patholgically envious.

It may well be that the wall was specifically intended to cover for criminal corruption by HRC and WC. Certainly the packing of the 911 Comm was an HRC job, interesting down to and critically including the General Counsel, who had authority to flag any conflict of interest.

My concern at the moment is defeating the Left, of stopping and reversing the incredible damage they have done in the name of their nitpicking socialist abstractions, and in particular preventing usurpation of US sovereignty which is far closer than anyone realizes outside these circles of satanic depravity.

I fear the only inquiry that may ever probe sufficiently into Clintons real corruptions are historic inquiries. I see no hope of a governmental process. Like debtors who have borrowed so much the banks dont dare foreclose, the scale of Clinton corruption is so great that it defies investigation.

Again, the Left continues to threaten our future, Gorelicks conduct was entirely consistent with the Lefts means and goals and she and HRC are dead center part of the movement, hence for me their baby boom left idenity is their defining characteristic. The point that Gorelick used the power of her position to expand without authority unnecessary and unauthorized restrictions on law enforcement that also provided cover for her sponsors corruption, to me localizez the seriousness of her acts to a relic of a past administration, when it is part actually of the ongoing threat posed by Leftist claptrap turned into law and which in many cases is causing new and current threats to US survival. Therefore:

HRC + Gorelick = WMD w/ multiple bad effects.


47 posted on 09/12/2006 5:01:45 AM PDT by Gail Wynand (If they werent resisting so hard, it would mean we had attacked the wrong place (Iraq).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird
Thank you :)

FYI

48 posted on 09/12/2006 5:10:36 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"Clown carnival"

"twice the recreational sodomy"

exquisite.


49 posted on 09/12/2006 5:11:39 AM PDT by Gail Wynand (If they werent resisting so hard, it would mean we had attacked the wrong place (Iraq).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar; Minuteman23; Gail Wynand; All
Thank you :)

Re joanie-f 's thought-provoking essay, some random ruminations....

50 posted on 09/12/2006 5:23:02 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson