Posted on 09/10/2006 9:16:53 AM PDT by mware
Edited on 09/10/2006 3:32:33 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
I didn't hear if anyone was planning for a live thread of the film tonight. Just in case anyone wants to start early. Some in Australia already have seen part 1. Part 1 airs tonight at 8pm Eastern Time on ABC.
The whacko named Michael Lewis over at Huffington Post is completely freaking out because the Aussie and NZ stations have already broadcast the *unedited* version, and the BBC will be running it at 3PM ET today.
They're hoping and praying that someone will file a lawsuit to prevent the airing of the unedited version here in the USA.
Real champions of free speech, they are.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/martin-lewis/alert-911-show-has-al_b_29103.html
The Some whacko named Michael Martin Lewis
LOL that is going to hurt Billy Boy more than an cut version here. He cares more about what the rest of the world thinks of him than what we Americans do.
I know Bryon the Aussie has reported about the viewing. Hope that Mad Ivan makes an appearance here after viewing the film.
Good idea....you could approach the mods and try to get this on Frontpage News.
I have never been waiting for a network show as eagerly as this one. The moonbats don't sem to realize that their lies are only encoraging more people to see the truth for themselves. I wish ABC has not edited the docudrama though; by doing so they have proved yet again that they are tools of the American Left!!
By: klondiker on September 10, 2006 at 12:08pm
ha ha!
There sure is going to be a large order of those uncut versions of DVD. Want to bet Borders does not carry it.
| 'The Path to 9/11' Annotated: CLIPS, SYNOPSIS, THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS, THE CLINTON JACKBOOT |
Celebrate FREEDOM! Buy a Gun for 9/11 !!!
This makes me very suspicious that there even exists an "edited" version.
The yo-yo over at Huffington believes they're running the *unedited* version because there's not been enough time to create and "ship" an edited version.
But that makes no sense. Networks do not "ship" video programs via Fedex or the US mail. They send them via the Internet. A 2 1/2 hour show might be a few gigabytes and could be moved from the US to Oz in an hour or even less.
Even if ABC stopped the "editing" at midnight last night, there would have plenty of time to transmit the files to New Zealand and Oz. There is still time right now to get that "edited" version over to the Brits.
That everyone is allegedly running an "unedited" version makes me believe that there isn't any other version.
"I wish ABC has not edited the docudrama though; by doing so they have proved yet again that they are tools of the American Left!!"
There is no proof that they've done any editing at all.
They didn't burn all the books. All of the scenes the Stalinist Left wanted cut have now shown up on the Internet for all to see. Overseas, the movie was shown uncut; and we are getting more reports about it. If ABC censor scenes in the American broadcast, we will know about it.
BJClinton and his Stalinist cabal thought they could return to 1990's intimidation and bullying to get their way. They forgot there is now in 2006 a New Media, the Internet, Drudge, and more importantly, Rush Limbaugh has the uncut movie in his hands.
At the end of the day, the Book-burning Stalinist Left lose.
They are such fools, I do not know what % of people use computers but I can guarantee that even the ones that do not want this movie to air are going to look at the cut sceens just out of curiosity sake.
I say bring it on. File a lawsuit and we will finally get Jamie Gorelick under oath instead of sitting on a whitewash commission.
The US media are going to have a hard time explaining why the people in other countries can view this film without censorship while we are not given the same FReedom.
The good news about this film it that it flushed out the Clinonista's.
And by doing so, it reminds the American people of the Clinton years...
which cannot be good for democrats.
If I were the judge I would say I'll hear the case and schedule it on Tuesday.
I was hoping someone would do this! Thanks!
One of them said that the final key scene in tonight's episode is absolutely devastating to Sandy Burglar.
Precisely- sow the wind; reap the whirlwind.
That's Sandy "Scissorhands" Berger.
I heard that the director of the film has received death threats, and some left wing web sites have published the home addresses of ABC executives.
Oh, they'll carry it, but you'll have to ask Employee #1 to ask Employee #2, who then whispers your request to the young librarian-like female manager with greasy, pulled-back bright red hair and Lisa Loeb spectacles, and she'll go through a door, turn right, walk straight 28 footsteps, makes a left, go through another door, then down some steps, into a basement, make a right, walk into a corner, and find this "diseased conservative propaganda" for you!
'Um, I didn't come here for the October 2006 issue of Hustler, just The Path to 9/11!!!"
"If ABC censor scenes in the American broadcast, we will know about it."
It makes no sense whatsoever that ABC would have the integrity to budget and make the $40 million film, run it without commercials, offer free Internet downloads and streaming (which they had been promising last week), and distribute the unedited version overseas, and then ..... ruin all that goodwill by chopping it up to hide portions from American viewers, and at the behest of Bill Clinton.
I think this "edited" version is a hopeful myth of the Rats. There is no "edited" version.
| 'The Path to 9/11' Annotated: CLIPS, SYNOPSIS, THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS, THE CLINTON JACKBOOT |
||
| Posted by Mia T On 09/10/2006 8:10:36 AM CDT · 17 replies · 607+ views ABC via redstate.org ^ | 9.10.06 | Mia T, redstate.org 'The Path to 9/11' Annotated: CLIPS, SYNOPSIS, THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS, THE CLINTON JACKBOOT annotated by Mia T, 9.10.06 (clips, synopses from Redstate.org) he islamofascist terrorists declared war on America and committed acts of war against America when BILL CLINTON was president of America. But bill clinton IGNORED the declarations and acts of war because he is a coward and because crushing the muslim terrorists didn't comport with his personal goals. This self-absorbed postmodern blight on America thought he could perform his usual deconstructionist sleight of hand, fool the people and define away the threat ("It all depends on what... |
||
Excellent point, mware.
Martin Lewis is a British-born, Hollywood-based humorist, commentator, producer and radio host.
In other words, he is a KOOK!
ABC said all edits were finished by Friday night.
They edited things (like flow etc.), but I doubt they would run two versions.
Apparently, they did not edit out the scenes the Clintons are complaining out (if they are in fact running the Berger hang-up scene etc. overseas).
Those silly peace advocates threatening death and staking out peoples' homes again...
Is it where he hangs up, or is that edited?
"If there is an 'uncut' version, it will be out later on DVD...and both will show a heroic Clinton."
It'll be available on the streetcorners of every American city for $10.00 by the end of this week.
What is the facts surrounding this, did Berger, in fact hang up on them, or is this just representative of him not giving permission in general?
The good news is that if the unedited version was broadcast in Australia, New Zealand, and the BBC will broadcast the unedited version worldwide on its network, there will be zillions of copies made that can be shown on the internet here is the USA if ABC has tinkered with the USA version. I kind of doubt that ABC would mess with the USA version. They are not fools. We shall see in a few hours. If disney/ABC let the unedited version run, it means that Bill Clinton and the Democrat Party have no power whatsoever. Why do i get the feeling that someone or some group is trying to destroy Bill Clinton and the Democrat party, and it ain't Republicans, Conservatives or the VRWC. Any ideas. or am I nuts?
thanks for the additional links Tom.
George Soros????
Exactly.
Yes, where CIA supposedly has bin Laden under observation and Burglar cuts the line.
RELATED THREADS, 9/11 and Path to 9/11:
The Truth about Bill Clinton and Terrorism (FR Compilation Thread) at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1697884/posts
Just watched 'The Path to 9/11' at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1698800/posts
Senate Democratic leadership threatens Disney with legal and legislative sanctions at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697413/posts
Dems Send Threatening Letter to ABC - and misspell word in second paragraph. at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697561/posts
Democratic Bloggers Plan to 'Google Bomb' Controversial 9/11 Docudrama at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697579/posts
Dick Morris: Clinton Attack 'Outrageous' at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697490/posts
BILL SICS LEGAL EAGLES ON ABC (Libs in Panic Mode) at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698849/posts
Letter from Dem Leaders to Disney to Cancel 'Path' Broadcast at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697777/posts
Thwack! Will Democrats Never Learn? at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697676/posts
Accuracy aside, ABC's '9/11' deserves to bomb (LEFTY 'TV CRITIC' ISSUES WARNING) at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697680/posts
KEYWORD: 911 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=911
BASIC OLDER POST: Berger rejected four plans to kill or capture bin Laden at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1177555/posts
These are the clips that THE CLINTONS WANT CENSORED! The clips they want edited out are posted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698800/posts?page=95#95
http://www.redstate.com/blogs/krempasky/2006/sep/09/abcs_path_to_9_11_clip_synopsis or
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/clinton_abc.html or these: http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58753/video.mov and
http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58763/video.mov and http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58767/video.mov
I'm kind of curious if there are any other movies Clinton felt that needed censoring.
When I watched Blackhawk Down I felt there was a lot missing regarding white house input. In my opinion it portrayed the military as undertaking operations pretty much in a vacuum and I know it just doesn't happen that way.
to the folks who plan to watch it, please see the "controversial" clips on google video, so you can compare them to the movie shown and note the edits.
From the clips online, he doesn't hang up anyway, he just refuses to authorize the action because he can't get it cleared at the top.
One of the sources for the film is a former Presidential military attache who was present in a situation where Burger was trying to reach Clinton re: Ben Laden and Clinton wouldn't take the call.
So, I think what we're going to discover, if the unedited version airs, is that the author took a known fact set, then created a fictitous scene around it. That's pretty common for most 'docu-dramas', and they're all subject to nit picking from someone who says "I never hung up the phone", where the real issue isn't whether the moment portrayed is a literal reproduction, the real issue is, "did the administration have B.L. in its sights and blow it?"
In a way you could say it's a reverse of the "fake but accurate" argument. In this case, the scene has some dramatic license, but the facts behind it are accurate.
I feel their pain. ;')
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.