posted on 09/11/2006 11:23:56 AM PDT
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
posted on 09/11/2006 11:30:37 AM PDT
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
The left will be in overdrive to kill this.
What are the chances of it passing the House?
posted on 09/11/2006 11:36:00 AM PDT
Zounds! This sounds like...common sense! Too bad common sense has to be legislated.
Did the ACLU get to testify for the other side? If so, just for grins, I'd like to know what they said.
posted on 09/11/2006 11:44:06 AM PDT
(Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
This bill really doesn't seem to do what is implied here. It does nothing to change the constitutionality of any actions, it mearly defines one subset of constitutional violations as exempt from awards of damages.
posted on 09/11/2006 12:11:17 PM PDT
If the republicans work this right,they can have a winning issue here.They need to make a really big deal out of this with the media so they can corner democrats.If the democrats vote against it the republicans can say they are anti-religion and use it in the election too!
The same principle is true of many lawsuits. The left often uses the threat of lawsuits to impose their agenda. They can't get bills passed so they use judges and lawyers to put their minority ideas in force.
In Texas the Democrats ran off to Oklahoma to impose their minority view. In Washington they filibuster to do the same.
Power is their only desire no matter how it is obtained. They are not nice people.
posted on 09/12/2006 10:06:21 AM PDT
by Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson