Posted on 09/11/2006 12:18:14 PM PDT by screw boll
I read the senate intelligence committee report. Here are some excerpts:
"The [FBI] summery said that when told there was clear evidence that the Iraqi government has previously met with Bin Ladin, Saddam responded "yes." Saddam than specified that Iraq did not cooperate with Bin Laden." (Page 67 Second paragraphs).
LOL. You made a much better choice :-)
Ping for later
BOOKMARKED!
Thanks.
That's a helluva list...pinging that for future reference...thanks!
Made up out of the whole cloth by Democrat staffers and the report, with it's contradictory conclusions, only got approved because Hagel and Snowe pulled Yet Another Benadict Arnold (YABA).
BTTT
Great list of links
ping
You're more than welcome.
Excellent list! We of course are in Iraq because of the Iraqi sponsored terrorism of the 1995 OKC bombing. Jayna Davis clearly showed that Iraq was involved and that the attacks would continue witht the state sponsored terrorism during the Clinton administration.
Only probably is that the majority of Americans and ALL the so called journalists don't believe they could get it all so wrong.
Clinton said no raghead terrorists are going to make me go to war when the soccer moms are so happy, Wall Street was setting records, and approval ratings took off when he lied. The only problem is that 9/11 came along and exposed Clinton's lies of no terrorism. But you simply can't put it all together as the whole party could come crashing down in Washington for BOTH PARTIES.
Bush is lying too, it's for the "good" of the country. Once you believe that Iraq was sponsoring terrorism that killed hundreds of Americans in the 90's, much of the unexplainable makes sense. For example, explain WHY Sandy Berger would stuff TOP SECRET documents into his underwear while preparing for the 9/11 hearings. And don't forget Jamie Gorelick on the 9/11 Commission. Why do hundreds of people see a missile hit TWA 800 and yet the FAA report on a center fuel tank explosion is simply impossible?
That's the real reasons the Iraq-Terrorism link can't be made. It's too obvious afer that link is made.
Just dang Peach. I may have to "borrow" some of that for my blog.
Feel free. As long as the word gets out, I don't care who publishes it.
Peach, you need to get a hobby......OH..... I see you have one! Damn good work!
Thanks. I'll let you know when I post it.
This political witch hunt committee of the Senate was formed on the Dim mantra that the administration had been politically selective in what did and did not constitute intelligence that should be believed.
Then it produced a report to agree with that mantra by being politically selective in what they did and not believe constituted intelligence that should be believed.
The Marxist historians could not have been more proud.
LOL. Thank you, wolfcreek.
Bookmark & BTTT !!
Read Stephen Hayes book: The Connection: How al Qaeda's Cooperation with Saddam Hussein Has Endangered America. Hayes covered known intelligence BEFORE we started transcribing and translating all of the documents we seized in Iraq after 2003. Its a joke when Dems say that there was no connection. Its only surpassed by the worst joke they tell when they claim that Bush blamed Saddam for 9/11.
Bingo. The evidence has been there for years and the media pretends that it doesn't exist. Its literally stuning that this much proof can do unknown to people who claim to be reporting on the exact subject matter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.