Skip to comments.Democrats Say Bush Politicized Sept. 11 in National Address
Posted on 09/12/2006 8:56:57 AM PDT by stm
WASHINGTON Democrats are blasting President Bush for giving what they call a political prime-time speech on the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Oh boo effing hoo! Poor babies.
JOHN KERRY LOST!
Yada, yada, yada.....
"We don't poll well on this issue!!"
Meaning: he mentioned it. ;)
as Rush pointed out yestersay, when President Bush addresses an issue OR the Nation, it's about the Country.
Not a National Address to say "I did not have sexual relations with that woman....."
These doorknobs are politicizing Buah's address by accusing him of politicizing it.
How dumb do they think we are anyway?
Translation: See Latest Rasmussen Poll Results.
"Bush", (didn't have my reading glasses on)
Ann Compton just led the Noon Radio news with Dingy's statement and her "concerned" voice
A politician being political in the political capital of Washington DC - unbelievable
HA HA, exactly...BUSH pulled a fast one on them...
Of course we all know that Democrats never, ever politicize anything. < /sarcasm >
Well, dumb enough for half of us to vote for John Kerry......
Democtats objected ... their platform in its entirety
Call the WWWWWWWWAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMbulance.
I AM SOOOOOO OVER DEMOCRAT RHETORIC AND THEIR CONSTANT WHINNING!
LMAO, I see. So they can bludgeon him with what they perceived he did wrong and the biased findings of the 9-11 Ommission report and also use the Iraq War to beat the president up with and that's not politicizing anything, right? So if Bush had just gone to Crawford yesterday and not visited the sites of the attacks or made any kind of statement to the American public, the Democrats wouldn't have screamed about the president's "lack of leadership on this important anniversary?" LOL. Get real.
I hope Americans will learn to tune out these vicious partisan obsessives as just being the stupid background noise they are. What a bunch of flaming fools. They accuse Bush of politicizing 9-11 because that's precisely what they've done with our nation's security issues in the last 5 years. They are masters of accusing others of the sins they themselves are guilty of.
Can you imagine ... in your wildest psychosis .... being THAT dumb????
How in the world does that happen??
So was this:
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
9/11 and the WOT just happen to be the unquestioned OVERRIDING issue of our LIFETIMES!!!!
And the democrats don't want him to talk about it??? Give me a break
My very Liberal coworker came over to me this morning and said that George Bush should have been giving that speech every two weeks for the last five years. His critisim of our Fatboy Senator was Sclia-esque.
Hey, Dems, look in the mirror.
It's like groundhog day, everyday, with these Dems. They are on a taped recording that just keeps looping.
If the President gave a speech on toothpaste he would be politicizing it.
Do you have anything to add, except perhaps that you're pi$$ed that his War on Terror has been so effective?
Well, dumb enough for half of us to vote for John Kerry......
Exactly! They wouldn't win another election if not for that disconcerting reality.
It defines them,,,and it is just WHAT THEY DO BEST. We can't that.
I would like to know specifically what their beef is. GWB never mentioned party or politics once. If anything, he could have used this opportunity to trash the Dems for being defeatists and soft on terror but as usual he took the high road. I would like to see him get down and dirty with them more often but that is not his style. In fact, is he not the least partisan president in modern history?
CHURCHILL: I say to the House as I said to ministers who have joined this government, I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat. We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many months of struggle and suffering.
You ask, what is our policy? I say it is to wage war by land, sea, and air. War with all our might and with all the strength God has given us, and to wage war against a monstrous tyranny never surpassed in the dark and lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy.
You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory. Victory at all costs - Victory in spite of all terrors - Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival.
CHAMBERLAIN: Churchill is politicizing the war!!!
BBC: We must surrender immediately!
No. . . . the BBC wasn't like that back then, was it?
Oh, that was a low blow.
Rebutting them with Lincoln's famous address.
And, yes, I agree with the majority here. I'm tired of their crying. *I* didn't ask for only one party to be sane on the war. You liberal morons are the ones that chose to abandon domestic issues you've always considered to be your strong suit, in favor of rooting against this country during war.
Just how damn difficult would it have been to preach FDR New Deal policies and SUPPORT the war as used to be done for the majority of our history?
If you are unhappy, you made your flea ridden bed. We didn't. Infact I've been fighting to keep the last sane voice on national security in your party still a force. And ordinarily I wouldn't lend a political hand to a liberal, but you guys have forced me to in Leiberman's case.
I demanded Dean's resignation. I tried to tell you idiots to purge Kos, but you wouldn't listen. This is YOUR fault so suck it up and deal with the consequences of your irresponsible actions.
"Good morning, you have reached the offices of the Democratic National Convention. We are currently working on new whines and attacks on Bush so please leave a message. Listen carefully because our menus (and agendas) are constantly changing. To listen to the whimper of the day, press one. To call the Waaahmbulance, press two. To add a unique hate-speak comment to our tired and worn out mantras, press three......"
oops, should be Committee. My bad
DNC: Bush politicized 9/11 by getting out of bed.
So W used that time to tell the American Public that the masterminds of many terrorist attacks against us were moved to GITMO...rather smart I thought. He was able to get the word out afterall. The dimwits didn't like that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.