Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lt. Col. Bill Cowan to appear on WMAL 630 to discuss the credibility of the "Predator photo"
WMAL ^ | Perdogg

Posted on 09/14/2006 3:22:54 AM PDT by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
3. Get said jet over the target. We generally do not have jets flying around in circles over all of Afghanistan, burning lots of jet fuel, just in case a good target comes up.

We need to develop a "bomb truck" for situations like this where we have no air or ground defense threat. Take a good sized commercial jet, modify it to carry a range of internal ordinance including high speed cruise missiles or stand off attack missiles. Have them fly a racetrack over hot spotswhich at cruise and altitude is very fuel efficient. They would have great bomb loads, long loiter times and it would be cheap cheap cheap compared to our conventional bombers.
41 posted on 09/14/2006 5:46:28 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mware
If I remember correctly, al queda hid in cemeteries in Iraq. I'm not sure if I remember any cemetery being blown up there. It's kinda the Mosque thing.

I think it would be frowned on IF it had occurred.

And for all we know, we had our dudes in the group. Perhaps the intelligence is worth more than the hit.

42 posted on 09/14/2006 5:46:58 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Col. Cowan said the it was an unarmed drone/predator.


43 posted on 09/14/2006 5:48:36 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
grrr, he said that it was an unarmed drone/predator, just now on Fox & Friends.
44 posted on 09/14/2006 5:50:22 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

So to clarify- the drone saw the target, but we did not have time to scramble and nail the target, correct?

The question remains- who was the first news org who said we don't target funerals? Who was behind making this look bad for the administration?


45 posted on 09/14/2006 5:57:41 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All

the only reason these things should be UNARMED is after they have delivered their payload. what is the point in having the damn things oooo looky a formation, man some ordanince would be nice!


46 posted on 09/14/2006 5:58:13 AM PDT by Kewlhand`tek (Those that can't , Teach. Those that can't teach , Report)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Cowan was just on Fox & Friends.

He said (1) the drone was unarmed, (2) all up the chain of command wanted to attack, but they couldn't get a weaponized plane their fast enough.

But he also said up the chain of command were all livid that they didn't have authority to fire.

Steve Doocy countered with: NBC reports that the drone WAS armed with a missile.

Cowan says that is not true.

===

So, there are still unanswered questions about the incident or failure to make an incident.


47 posted on 09/14/2006 5:59:03 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I would believe Bill Cowan over Steve Doocy any day.


48 posted on 09/14/2006 6:00:13 AM PDT by Perdogg (If you stay home in November, you will elect Pelosi speaker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
The Pentagon has plenty of Clintoids there.
49 posted on 09/14/2006 6:01:48 AM PDT by Perdogg (If you stay home in November, you will elect Pelosi speaker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
WMAL recently changed their coding for their stream.

You need the new one.

Try this [cut and paste it into your player]:

http://abcrad.wm.llnwd.net/abcrad_wmal
50 posted on 09/14/2006 6:03:15 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Wow. Once again, the truth slips through the cracks..


51 posted on 09/14/2006 6:04:30 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

It seems that nbc was the recipient of the original photo.


52 posted on 09/14/2006 6:07:38 AM PDT by maica (9/11 was not “the day everything changed”, but the day that revealed how much had already changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

I think the television news outlets got the information for the print outlets.


53 posted on 09/14/2006 6:09:28 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Thanks, TomGuy.


54 posted on 09/14/2006 6:09:41 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: maica; mware

So NBC gets the photo. Did they then conclude we don't target funerals? Did NBC make this ROE up out of thin air, or did an anonymous military official tell them that?


55 posted on 09/14/2006 6:19:15 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
U.S. passes up chance to strike Taliban - MSNBC
56 posted on 09/14/2006 6:23:26 AM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; SE Mom
Pentagon: Release of Taliban Funeral Photo Unauthorized - FOX NEWS
57 posted on 09/14/2006 6:25:57 AM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Lt. Tamara Lawrence, a spokeswoman with the U.S. military in Kabul, said the photograph was released to the network by someone who did not have the clearance to hand it out.

"It is an operational security issue and the photo was released at an inappropriate level," Lawrence told The Associated Press. "Inquiries are being made into how it was released."

Lawrence declined to provide further details. It was not clear when the photo was taken nor where the gathering took place.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,213641,00.html


58 posted on 09/14/2006 6:28:09 AM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
From the MSNBC article:

a coalition spokesperson said. “A decision was made not to strike this group of insurgents at that specific location and time.”

If a decision was made not to strike, then either coalition forces were close enough to strike or the drone was armed.

If the drone was not armed, why wouldn't the coalition spoksperson say that?
59 posted on 09/14/2006 6:31:12 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
With the attacks in the Congress on Rummy, I can guarantee, he will find out who leaked the photo and what it was described as by the leaker.

I got a feeling the media did their own interpretation of this photo.

60 posted on 09/14/2006 6:31:14 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson