Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libstripper
I haven't read this yet, but ... based on the title .. I seem to remember, not too long after the speciel invistigation was going on, and nothing was being found ... Libby said something that gave the commies an "AHA !!! " moment. Whatever it was, it was determined to be a violation of law or some such .. so Libby will be prosecuted because he said something unconnected to the charge, that warrented a charge.

At least that's what I think I remember.

4 posted on 09/16/2006 4:16:23 AM PDT by knarf (Muslims kill each other ... News wall-to-wall, 24/7 .. don't touch that dial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: knarf
Remember that Martha Stewart was tried and jailed for just the same kind of thing! Investigation revealed that she had committed no insider trading BUT she had lied about the sequence of events to coverup(what later was determined not a crime or at least not prosecutable).

When pubbies had the clintons nuts on the chopping block, NONE of this went on. No irresponsible prosecutions of peripheral crimes, hell, no prosecution of real crimes. Pubbies are pathetic and don't know how to fight.

is it any wonder that they are regularly beaten by a bunch as laughable as the dims?

7 posted on 09/16/2006 4:59:56 AM PDT by cb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson