Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin
The police need a warrant before they can enter the premises. If you invite them inside, all bets are off. When a police officer asks if they can step inside my home, I politely decline and step outside to speak with them.

This ruling only says they don't have to have a reason to ASK to search. It doesn't say they don't have to have a warrent to search without permission. Just refuse if they ask. Don't invite them inside, don't sign any agreements to allow searches. IOW, protect your constitutional rights as you should always have been doing.

There is nothing particularly sinister about this ruling.

12 posted on 09/21/2006 4:08:33 PM PDT by calex59 (Hillary Clinton is dumber than a one eyed monkey with a brain tumor(credit to Harley69))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: calex59
There is nothing particularly sinister about this ruling.

Oh yes there is. NJ Supreme Court has made it official...

This is a two edged sword.

The ruling was a battle about police accused of racial profiling by making stops on the NJ Turnpike.

As a sop to the liberals (What??!!?? NJ Liberal!!??) this has the opportunity to turn any race baiter into an unpaid informant on their neighbor.

There are wheels within wheels on this ruling..and please believe me..I don't spin conspiracies.

26 posted on 09/21/2006 4:22:10 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson