Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unhappy voters imperil heartland Republicans (Reuters-DNC "News" Release)
Al-Reuters ^ | 9-22-06 | Andrea Hopkins

Posted on 09/22/2006 11:25:10 AM PDT by Lance Romance

By Andrea Hopkins

MONROE CITY, Indiana (Reuters) - In a dozen districts across the U.S. heartland, voter unhappiness has imperiled Republicans, setting the stage for what could be the biggest anti-incumbent midterm election since 1994.

Pat Wilkerson says U.S. troops and veterans are her first priority, believes family values are important and voted Republican in 2004. But in November she'll switch parties -- though not because Democrats have won her over.

"When I vote now, it's not who I'm voting for, it's who I'm voting against," said the 59-year-old administrator, adding she is fed up with the war in Iraq and wants troops home.

"I think a lot of Republicans who are in office are at risk," Wilkerson said as she watched sweating politicians work the crowd at a town festival in Monroe City in southwest Indiana.

Polls show U.S. voters are overwhelmingly unhappy with the direction of the country.

In a New York Times/CBS poll released on Thursday, 77 percent of respondents said most members of Congress did not deserve re-election. Fifty percent said they would support a Democrat in November, when control of Congress is at stake, compared with 35 percent who said they would vote Republican.

That discontent has convinced some that control of Congress could change hands for the first time since 1994, when Republicans gained 54 seats amid a wave of voter anger. Democrats need to gain 15 seats in the House of Representatives and six Senate seats in November to win a majority.

While all 435 House seats and a third of the Senate's 100 seats are up for grabs on November 7, gerrymandered districts means only a fraction are

Blah Blah Blah.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006election; bullzogby; dncplaybook; dnctalkingpoints; election2006; howtostealanelection; mediabias; mobysmarchingmorons; thebiglie; triedthisin2004; zogbyism
Typical Reuters story. However they will wake up on a cold Noverber Wednesday claiming that even though Democrats didn't take over Congress or the Senate they really set the stage for Hillary in 2008.

Tradesports.com really has the pendulum swinging Republicans way.

1 posted on 09/22/2006 11:25:11 AM PDT by Lance Romance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

They ran essentially the same story on NPR this morning...


2 posted on 09/22/2006 11:26:21 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

They're already in contact with the Mexican Left. Maybe the two Shadow Governments can form their own Shadow Alliance.


3 posted on 09/22/2006 11:27:53 AM PDT by samtheman (The Democrats are Instituting their own Guest Voter Program.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Andrea Hopkins is fantasizing!

Just do a quick google of her name + Reuters...you'll see just about all of her stories are gloom and doom for conservatives. :)

I wish I had her number...I'd call her up on Election Night!

4 posted on 09/22/2006 11:36:28 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

Is this the same Pat Wilkerson, single mother of three, who is quoted in a Kellogg Foundation document on "grassroots leadership?"

http://www.wkkf.org/DesktopModules/WKF_DmaItem/ViewDoc.aspx?LanguageID=0&CID=6&ListID=28&ItemID=60815&fld=PDFFile


5 posted on 09/22/2006 11:37:37 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

Since Reuters claims they always verify stories before running them then I think they should prove Pat Wilkerson voted for "Republicans" in '04. I will bet someone is lying!


6 posted on 09/22/2006 11:40:39 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Pat Wilkerson ... voted Republican in 2004. But in November she'll switch parties...

Ah yes, proof by anecdote. How very "Reuters".

You have to wonder how many folks they had to interview before they found some a$$clown to say what they wanted to hear.
7 posted on 09/22/2006 11:40:59 AM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

Just like this guy, who turned out to be a Rat.

8 posted on 09/22/2006 11:42:25 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Have a link on that story? I'd like to read it and bookmark it.

Another Brownshirt for Kerry.


9 posted on 09/22/2006 11:43:45 AM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Have a link on that story? I'd like to read it and bookmark it.

Ask and ye shall receive.

10 posted on 09/22/2006 11:45:41 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Maybe she voted Republican in the primaries but had no intention of voting Republican in the general election.

Dems have been known to do this countless times.

The media loved some rich Dem who did just that in 2000. This guy said that he'd never seen a candidate who matched his positions so much as Al Gore did. And he got a lot of headline ink as being a "Republican" (in name only) who funded Al Gore Jr.'s recount effort. He even joined up at FR to defend his politics.


11 posted on 09/22/2006 11:46:04 AM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Pat Wilkerson is located in District 1 that is represented already by a Democrat Pete Visclosky.
12 posted on 09/22/2006 11:52:13 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

Is this story so wrong?

While many won't vote for Dems, it's hard to say that the current Congress is "Conservative" nor do they embrace Conservative ideas.

1. Fiscal responsibilty
2. Less Gov't.
3. Personal responsibility

don't seem to be on the agenda!


13 posted on 09/22/2006 11:55:10 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

So, will there be millions of words of analysis if the Dems somehow fail (again) to meet media election expectations?

Or will it be another two solid years of pounding the same Dem drum for 2008?


14 posted on 09/22/2006 11:55:28 AM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

Is this another one of those "from the days when I marched for a nuclear freeze in the eighties to my work organizing unions in the nineties, I have always been a conservative but now that guldarned Bush has caused me to consider voting for a Democrat for the first time" stories?


15 posted on 09/22/2006 11:56:20 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Remember,,,,the Tax Man cometh after the election.
16 posted on 09/22/2006 12:05:05 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance

There was a similar report on our Public Radio here in GA. They had interviews from people, mainly women that had previously voted GOP and now were considering voting RAT. One was the Mother of an Iraqi soldier, and voiced her concern for him. It made me want to puke.


17 posted on 09/22/2006 12:05:39 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Don't forget about the three "supposedly randomly choosen" Tennesee'n women, interviewed on Good Morning America, who claimed to be "life long Republicans" but voting Democrat for this election...All were found to be high level Democrats and activists, thanks to some fine FReesearch. GMA had to issue a correction on air the next morning.

One would be hardpressed, HARDPRESSED, to find a *real* "Republican turned Democrat". As we know, "Once you go Republican, you don't go back!"

18 posted on 09/22/2006 1:15:36 PM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson