Posted on 09/22/2006 1:26:50 PM PDT by HAL9000
Hewlett-Packard CEO Mark Hurd announces he has accepted the resignation of former chairwoman Patricia Dunn from the board of directors as a result of the H-P leak investigation and spying scandal. MORE...
Am I the only one who thinks the reaction to this story has actually gone overboard?
Dunn's done.
Correction - she was to remain the chairwoman until January, but her resignation is now effective immediately.
Tech company news
Yeah, they need to toner it down a bit.
I copy that. They should stick to the fax.
Women at HP do not fair well; interesting, you would think with all of the "progressives" in the San Francisco Bay Area this would never happen. Maybe boys and girls are not simply programmed, the hard wiring is different (I have one of each and assure you it is)
Probably, since Dunn knew early on that the detectives were committing felonies.
H-P Lawyer: H-P will provide the information obtained from pretexting to the victims.
H-P has found at some instances where Social Security Numbers were unlawfully provide for pretexting purposes against four journalists, three board members, and one H-P employee.
H-P admits sending spyware in a trojan horse e-mail message to a reporter. Mark Hurd admits involvement in certain aspects of this project, but not the spyware.
H-P used physical surveillance on board members and journalists, including digging in their trashcans.
Lawyer says no evidence of wiretapping or keystroke logging, or planting spys as employees within newsrooms.
"Yeah, they need to toner it down a bit.
I copy that. They should stick to the fax."
I'm sorry, what you both are saying just doesn't compute.
Related:
California Attorney General Says No Evidence Yet Linking HP CEO to Wrongdoing
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,215199,00.html
HP's Hurd says he never knew about tracer technology
http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7BCB3E7DF1%2D279F%2D4677%2DAE37%2D540AC704DFC3%7D&dist=rss&siteid=mktwdist%3Drss&siteid=mktw
FAQ: The HP boardroom leak scandal
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9003560&intsrc=news_ts_head
Hewlett-Packard switches into damage control mode
http://www.columbiatribune.com/2006/Sep/20060922Busi002.asp
Hewlett-Packard CEO Mark Hurd says Chairwoman Patricia Dunn has resigned, effective immediately
http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/news/15584051.htm
Hewlett-Packard gets request from SEC about leak probe
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/orl-hewlett2206sep22,0,1448681.story?coll=orl-business-headlines
Hurd: Dunn out as board chairman
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9003549&intsrc=news_ts_head
When are the leakers going to jail.
The only reason she did not submit her resume earlier was that her HP supplied printer cartridge was already out of ink.
Not just Dunn. Their friggin' director of ethics/in-house cousel knew about it back in February.
Nick, if you don't care about the ethics surrounding this, I hope you care about false filings, remembering the Enron incident. They they signed a quarterly report to the SEC, falsifying it to cover up this incident, which could and did affect shareholder value. That CANNOT be allowed to happen. People seriously need to go to jail.
Which report? I was referring to the spying.
The HP way,my my.
The leaking wasn't a criminal offense, but HP has dealt with the leaker as they see fit.
Another headline: Heard Hurd: "What's Done is Dunn"
She called Tech Support but it was already the middle of the
night in Calcutta, and no one answered.
I think she should be out of there.
I also think she may well be facing criminal charges.
If only a reporter would ask: "Were any of the non-employees spyed on by HP, registered HP customers?"
1. The spying involved multiple felonies in and of itself. Now, maybe you're OK with criminal conduct. I'm not.
2. A board member resigned over the spying and gave his reasons. HP was required to submit a report to the SEC detailing the resignation, including any communications with the board member regarding the reasons he left. HP submitted a false report that did not mention his quitting due to HP committing felonies.
3. So now we have a fraudulent SEC report tied to the spying. That's a major-league Sarbanes-Oxley violation.
4. Why is it that you have no problem with criminal activity?
The story goes like this:
The REAL crime was investigating the MEDIA.
To me, it's a little stange to go after one person for something that is so common and is completely ignored. If pretexting is bad, why is it only bad when HP does it? If Patty Dunn was a reporter, this wouldn't be an issue.
I have a problem with criminal activity, but I also have a problem with selective enforcment. There are companies that specialize in doing pretexting for major U.S. companies. It's happening all the time. When is it illegal?
"H-P admits sending spyware in a trojan horse e-mail message to a reporter. Mark Hurd admits involvement in certain aspects of this project, but not the spyware."
That's good for jail time right there.
Why not:
"Hurd heard, Dunn done!"
Indeed. You win!
The beauty of FR is that...
'S'not a competition, only common understanding.
wow, no mention yet of "put a fork in her butt, she's Dunn".
Is there any truth to the story I heard on the news today that the current CEO was involved in it also?
When it's done in the state of California, where pretexting is itself a felony--that is not a universal stance across the country. Yes, the enforcement is "selective," in that sense.
Could be.
Thanks...I do a poor job of doing a search...
It depends on how it was done. For example, using a web bug is probably legal.
The thing that may get them in the most serious trouble is identity theft by misusing Social Security numbers for pretexting purposes.
Do you mean, "Dunn is Done."?
yep
The company that my husband works for bugged my computer and all our cell phones. I had emails from my home computer, showing up as text mails on my phone and emails to and from my husband's office, showing up on my phone, as well. At the time, neither one of us knew how to even send a text message on our phones. Every time I tried to shut down my computer, I got a message that someone else was logged on. They disabled my virus protection and firewall, and every time I downloaded a new one, they did the same thing. This went on for about a year, actually it may have been exactly a year. It was about a political infight about a take-over. I would love to see the president of his division indicted and I suspect that there are many other victims of this corporate abuse that are following this case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.