Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"YOU'VE GOT THAT LITTLE SMIRK ON YOUR FACE" (Rough Transcript of Clinton interview)
The Corner ^ | 9/23/06

Posted on 09/23/2006 1:49:25 PM PDT by Brian Mosely

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-270 next last
To: Brian Mosely
I worked hard to try and kill him. I authorized a finding for the CIA to kill him. We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody has gotten since. And if I were still president we’d have more than 20,000 troops there trying to kill him.

Now, how are all the moonbats going to react to all this killing?

41 posted on 09/23/2006 2:14:13 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Bingo... The sad part is all the Sheeple that believe his lies.


42 posted on 09/23/2006 2:15:16 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Felis_irritable
Mrs Felis gets all mad at me when I scream at the television

Screaming? I'm going to be screaming hysterically, ROTFLMAO.

Do you realize what this sort of behavior will mean to Hillary's chances?

43 posted on 09/23/2006 2:15:17 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace begins in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
That's easy.

Just compare the number of times Slick called the Directors of the FBI and CIA vs. the number of times he called a "low-level, star-struck, flunkie, the age of his daughter" for phone sex.

Or compare the number of times he called (or met in person) the Pentagon or Chairman of the Joint Chiefs vs. the number of time his was being 'serviced' by that same person above.

I think that comparing those numbers would show publicly where his REAL priorities were.

44 posted on 09/23/2006 2:15:27 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: arkady_renko

That's what it's always about for the Rats . . . *intentions.*


45 posted on 09/23/2006 2:16:05 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Richard Miniter: One of the big myths about the Clinton years is that no one knew about bin Laden until Sept. 11, 2001. In fact, the bin Laden threat was recognized at the highest levels of the Clinton administration as early as 1993. What's more, bin Laden's attacks kept escalating throughout the Clinton administration; all told bin Laden was responsible for the deaths of 59 Americans on Clinton's watch.

President Clinton learned about bin Laden within months of being sworn into office. National Security Advisor Anthony Lake told me that he first heard the name Osama bin Laden in 1993 in relation to the World Trade Center attack. Lake briefed the president about bin Laden that same year.

In addition, starting in 1993, Rep. Bill McCollum (R., Fla.) repeatedly wrote to President Clinton and warned him and other administration officials about bin Laden and other Islamic terrorists. McCollum was the founder and chairman of the House Taskforce on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare and had developed a wealth of contacts among the mujihedeen in Afghanistan. Those sources, who regularly visited McCollum, informed him about bin Laden's training camps and evil ambitions.

Indeed, it is possible that Clinton and his national-security team learned of bin Laden even before the 1993 World Trade Center attack. My interviews and investigation revealed that bin Laden made his first attack on Americans was December 1992, a little more than a month after Clinton won the 1992 election. His target was 100 U.S. Marines housed in two towering Yemen hotels. Within hours, the CIA's counterterrorism center learned that the Yemen suspected a man named Osama bin Laden. (One of the arrested bombing suspects later escaped and was detained in a police sweep after al Qaeda attacked the USS Cole in 2000.) Lake says he doesn't remember briefing the president-elect about the attempted attack, but that he well might have.

So it is safe to conclude that Clinton knew about the threat posed by bin Laden since 1993, his first year in office.


snip


The Clinton administration simply did not want the responsibility of taking Osama bin Laden into custody. Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger is on the record as saying: "The FBI did not believe we had enough evidence to indict bin Laden at that time and therefore opposed bringing him to the United States." Even if that was true — and it wasn't — the U.S. could have turned bin Laden over to Yemen or Libya, both of which had valid warrants for his arrest stemming from terrorist activities in those countries. Given the legal systems of those two countries, Osama would have soon ceased to be a threat to anyone.

After months of debating how to respond to the Sudanese offer, the Clinton administration simply asked Sudan to deport him. Where to? Ambassador Carney told me what he told the Sudanese: "Anywhere but Somalia."

In May 1996 bin Laden was welcomed into Afghanistan by the Taliban. It could not have been a better haven for Osama bin Laden.


http://tinyurl.com/eqypl


46 posted on 09/23/2006 2:16:44 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

This is exactly why ex presidents should just keep their mouths shut.


47 posted on 09/23/2006 2:17:27 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
You screwed the pooch boy, and we don't mean Hillary.

O, Lordy!

48 posted on 09/23/2006 2:17:36 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace begins in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: All

bump to the top !!!


49 posted on 09/23/2006 2:17:40 PM PDT by JockoManning (Listen Online http://www.klove.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Hillary is warming up her "frying pan" arm.

Oh, yeah. He just about finished her off with this screed.

The Missus will not be happy.

Plus his blithe use of the term "right-winger" does nothing except remind the nation of MRS BILL CLINTON chalking the Sinkmeister's troubles up to the "vast right-wing conspiracy," and that reference does nothing but remind the nation of the extreme ickiness these two brought to the Office of the President.

50 posted on 09/23/2006 2:18:14 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
I authorized the CIA to get groups together to try to kill him.

The Impeached ex-president just admitted to a felony crime. Most people missed this.

51 posted on 09/23/2006 2:18:39 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

The entire transcript is worth a read. Previously I had only read snippets.


52 posted on 09/23/2006 2:18:45 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

As I posted previously, this has gotta be Rove's best work ever.


53 posted on 09/23/2006 2:18:50 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

54 posted on 09/23/2006 2:19:17 PM PDT by budman_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent
He just about finished her off with this screed.

Sweet.

55 posted on 09/23/2006 2:20:00 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace begins in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: technomage

Oh, yeah: if this clown wants to bring up his obsessions, well, bring it on!

BJ just opened the door to revisit all the gory details of his ickiness with this one. And MRS BILL CLINTON will not escape the replay of "The Way We Were."


56 posted on 09/23/2006 2:20:10 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

And democrats are livid that Pres Bush has broken the law with phone surveillance....lol


57 posted on 09/23/2006 2:20:18 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

I wonder if he can be prosecuted for ordering a CIA hit in the 1990's?


58 posted on 09/23/2006 2:20:52 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

What a whiner! There's a difference between the facts and what Clinton wants us to believe, as usual. This is what happens when he doesn't let his mouthpieces, Bruce Lindsey and Richard Ben-Veniste, do the talking for him.


59 posted on 09/23/2006 2:20:52 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Woo-daddy! He sure is pushing Richard Clarke's liar book, isn't he?

Hey Bill, put some ice on it!


60 posted on 09/23/2006 2:21:04 PM PDT by Humidston (Houston - Don't feed jihad...DON'T SHOP ON HARWIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson